Category: William M. Windsor Criminal Case

WILLIAM M. WINDSOR CRIMINAL CASE

Bill Windsor set out to film a movie exposing government, judicial, and law enforcement corruption. He traveled to every state (except Alaska), and he filmed over 750 stories of corruption and has thousands more who wanted to be filmed. Evil people, some working for various government entities and committing crimes, set out to destroy Bill Windsor and the movie, Lawless America. Bill Windsor has been defamed online in the largest case of defamation in U.S. history. His life has been threatened many times. A UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA EMPLOYEE, Sean Boushie, attempted to murder Bill Windsor. Sean Boushie then falsely claimed that Bill stalked him, threatened him with a gun, and a host of other lies. Corrupt courts gave Sean Boushie a Temporary Order of Protection. It expired on September 16, 2013, but corrupt Montana and Texas folks pretended it still existed, and a bench warrant was issued for unsuspecting Bill.

Bill Windsor was put into the Ellis County Texas Jail illegally for 53 days as a political prisoner — held for extradition. William M. Windsor was then unlawfully held in the Ada County Idaho Jail for 35 days and then illegally handed over to two Missoula County Montana Sheriff's Deputies on March 25, 2015. He was held there for 46 days (a grand total of 134 days behind bars). He escaped (on bond) at 11:30 am on May 9, 2015.

The State of Montana has filed five criminal charges against William M. Windsor for sending a Tweet, publishing the UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA EMPLOYEE's name (the would-be killer Sean Boushie) four times, sending a legal notice email to a University of Montana attorney, and filming the movie and the pilot for a TV show that will expose Montana as the most corrupt state in the country.

Motion for Compliance with Rules of U.S. Supreme Court was Filed by Bill Windsor

United States Supreme Court Crime Scene

On November 27, 2023, a Motion for Compliance with Rules of U.S. Supreme Court was filed by Bill Windsor

No. 22-7648

In The Supreme Court of the United States

WILLIAM M. WINDSOR,

Petitioner

James N. Hatten, et al, Respondents

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition To The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Motion to Require Confirmation of a Conference of the nine justices in Case No. 22-7648 and Issuance of an Order so Confirming; order reflecting the valid record of the decision of the Petition by the Court in Case No. 22 7648, the Due Process Notice, and Service by Clerk of the Court, Scott S. Harris, of Opinion in Case No. 22-7648 on each party; Reord of votes by each Justice in Case No. 22-7648; Order that the Motion for Rehearing be docketed pursuant to Due Process; that this Motion dated November 27, 2023 be docketed pursuant to Due Process; that Windsor be provided copies of all court records in the internal case management system of SCOTUS under Case No. 22-7648 at no charge, including all audit data; and if Case No. 22-7648 was not heard in Conference, that this Court file criminal charges against Scott S. Harris.

William M. Windsor, Pro Se – Self-Represented Litigant,

and Founding Member of the American Association of Non-Lawyers

5013 S Louise Ave #1134, Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57108

352-###-####, windsorinsouthdakota@yahoo.com

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

1. On May 10, 2023, William M. Windsor (“Windsor”), an individual, filed a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition and Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (“PETITION”). [EXHIBIT A – May 10, 2023.] This Filing was made in compliance with this Court’s Rule 29 and in the manner required by the Rules, as shown on the Certificate of Service. [EXHIBIT A, Pages 51-52.] The appropriate number of copies were mailed to the Clerk, and a copy was sent to the Solicitor General and the attorney involved in the case.
2. On May 10, 2023, the Docket of this Court shows: “Application (22A1009) to file petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition in excess of page limits, submitted to Justice Thomas.” [EXHIBIT A, May 10, 2023.]
3. On May 23, 2023, Justice Clarence Thomas granted the Application (22A1009) “to file petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition in excess of page limits. The petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition may not exceed 49 pages.” [EXHIBIT A, May 23, 2023.]
4. On June 1, 2023, the Waiver of the Right of Respondent United States to respond was filed. [EXHIBIT A, June 1, 2023.]
5. On July 20, 2023, the PETITION was “DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.” [EXHIBIT A, July 20, 2023.]
6. WINDSOR spoke by telephone with Jake in the Clerk’s Office. Jake explained that WINDSOR’s PETITION would be considered by the nine Justices in a “Conference.”
7. This Court’s “Filing and Rules” section explains:

“The timing for placing petitions on a conference list and distributing them to the Justices is governed by Rule 15.5, which provides as follows: “The Clerk will distribute the petition to the Court for its consideration upon receiving an express waiver of the right to file a brief in opposition, or, if no waiver or brief in opposition is filed, upon the expiration of the time allowed for filing. If a brief in opposition is timely filed, the Clerk will distribute the petition, brief in opposition, and any reply brief to the Court for its consideration no less than 14 days after the brief in opposition is filed, unless the petitioner expressly waives the 14-day waiting period.” [https://www.supremecourt.gov/casedistribution/casedistributionschedule.aspx.]

1. Clerk Scott S. Harris has explained Conference Scheduling in a memorandum. [https://www.supremecourt.gov/casehand/Guidance-on-Scheduling-2023.pdf.] [EXHIBIT K.]
2. The Supreme Court Historical Society explains the Conference process. [https://supremecourthistory.org/how-the-court-works/the-justices-conference/.] [EXHIBIT C.]
3. On October 2, 2023, this Court’s Docket shows “Petition DENIED.” [EXHIBIT A, October 2, 2023.]
4. On October 31, 2023, WINDSOR received a letter from Scott S. Harris dated October 2, 2023. [EXHIBIT D.] The letter is not even signed; it’s a stamp. It bears no seal, and it is not signed by the Justices. The letter does not qualify as an Order required after a Conference. And the time has not started to run on the filing of a motion for rehearing.
5. On October 27, 2023, WINDSOR filed a Motion for Rehearing just to be safe. [EXHIBIT E.] It was sent by USPS. [EXHIBIT F and EXHIBIT G.] This was 25 days after the Docket claims the Petition was denied, so it was timely (though an order has not been issued).
6. On November 3, 2023, a letter was dated to WINDSOR by Rashonda Garner for Scott S. Harris. [EXHIBIT H.] The letter is not an order. All copies of WINDSOR ‘s Filing were returned. [EXHIBIT I.] The original copy is stamped “RECEIVED OCT 30 2023 Office of the Clerk Supreme Court U.S. [EXHIBIT I.]
7. On November 20, 2023, the letter dated November 3, 2023 was received by WINDSOR. [EXHIBIT J.] The letter is not an order.
8. On November 21, 2023, WINDSOR called Rashonda Garner and left a detailed voicemail.
9. On November 21, 2023, Rashonda Garner left a voicemail saying she didn’t understand WINDSOR’s message.
10. On November 22, 2023, WINDSOR called Rashonda Garner and left a detailed voicemail.
11. On November 27, 2023, all of the unlawful mail dated November 3, 2023 regarding the Motion for Rehearing was sent certified mail return receipt to Rashonda Garner. [EXHIBIT H and EXHIBIT J.]

ARGUMENTS

AN ORDER MUST BE ISSUED ON THE CONFERENCE DECISION

1. The Rules of this Court require valid evidence of the October 2, 2023 alleged denial by the Court of the Petition of William M. Windsor in Supreme Court Case #22-7648.
2. The letters dated October 2, 2023 and November 3, 2023 are not orders and have no validity. [EXHIBIT D and EXHIBIT H.] The U.S. Supreme Court rules use the term “Letter” 13 times, and letters such as these are not authorized by the Rules.
3. No valid evidence of the denials was attached to the letters.
4. There is no order issued under seal, in violation of 28 U.S.C. 1691 – “All writs and process issuing from a court of the United States shall be under the seal of the court and signed by the clerk thereof.”

The word “process” at 28 U.S.C. 1691 means a court order. See Middleton Paper Co. v. Rock River Paper Co., 19 F. 252 (C.C. W.D. Wisconsin 1884); Taylor v. U.S., 45 F. 531 (C.C. E.D. Tennessee 1891); U.S. v. Murphy, 82 F. 893 (DCUS Delaware 1897); Leas & McVitty v. Merriman, 132 F. 510 (C.C. W.D. Virginia 1904); U.S. v. Sharrock, 276 F. 30 (DCUS Montana 1921); In re Simon, 297 F. 942, 34 ALR 1404 (2nd Cir. 1924); Scanbe Mfg. Co. v. Tryon, 400 F.2d 598 (9th Cir. 1968); and Miles v. Gussin, 104 B.R. 553 (Bankruptcy D.C. 1989).

1. Therefore, Windsor is requesting an order by the Court with a seal of the court and an actual signature of Scott S. Harris. This Due Process Notice and Service by Clerk of the Court Scott S. Harris is to be made on parties in 22-7648 of the valid record of denial of the Petition by the Court.

WINDSOR’S CONFERENCE DECISION MUST BE PUBLISHED

1. This Court’s Conference Decisions must be published, and WINDSOR’s has not.

“All conference decisions are published.” [https://supremecourthistory.org/how-the-court-works/the-justices-conference/ — EXHIBIT C, Paragraph 5.]

“When the vote has been taken on a case, the writing of an opinion is assigned—by the Chief if he voted with the majority, otherwise by the senior Justice of the majority.” [https://supremecourthistory.org/how-the-court-works/the-justices-conference/ — EXHIBIT C, Paragraph 6.]

WINDSOR’S FILINGS MUST BE DOCKETED

1. WINDSOR’S filing of a Motion for Rehearing [EXHIBIT E.] has been unlawfully excluded from the Docket. [EXHIBIT A.] It was timely filed with the Clerk in paper form – an original and 10 copies. There was no service by this Cour.
2. “Filing” is defined as:

“To place a paper in the official custody of the clerk of court to enter into the files or records of a case. [https://www.uscourts.gov/glossary#letter_f]

“the act of giving an official form or document to someone in authority in order to begin a legal process.” [Britannica Dictionary definition of FILING.]

“to deposit with the clerk of the court a written complaint or petition which is the opening step in a lawsuit and subsequent documents, including an answer, demurrer, motions, petitions, and orders. [Copyright © 1981 2005 by Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill.].

1. 1. This Court’s Rule 29 requires:

“1. Any document required or permitted to be presented to the Court or to a Justice shall be filed with the Clerk in paper form.

“2. A document is timely filed if it is received by the Clerk in paper form within the time specified for filing; or if it is sent to the Clerk through the United States Postal Service by first-class mail (including express or priority mail), postage prepaid, and bears a postmark, other than a commercial postage meter label, showing that the document was mailed on or before the last day for filing; or if it is delivered on or before the last day for filing to a third-party commercial carrier for delivery to the Clerk within 3 calendar days….”

1. Clerk Scott S. Harris of the United States Supreme Court seems to be routinely violating the due process requirements of many litigants.
2. Such Notice and Service are overdue, and Windsor demands that it be executed immediately.
3. Windsor asks that this Motion be docketed pursuant to Due Process and that a valid adjudication of the Motion be noticed and served on the parties.
4. Windsor also requests all court records in the internal case management system of SCOTUS under No. 22-7648, including all audit data. The audit data is the login name and login time of the individuals who entered any data in the records.
5. WINDSOR believes these unlawful practices have taken place for at least 15 years. WINDSOR requests copies of all letters issued rather than orders in every case since 01/01/2008.

ALL ORDERS AND COMMUNICATIONS WITH WINDSOR

MUST BE SENT BY EMAIL

1. Documents attached hereto show that WINDSOR does not receive mail promptly. The American Association of Non-Lawyers requires that non-lawyers receive all communications by email. This eliminates one of the many unfair advantages given to lawyers.
2. WINDSOR is a resident of South Dakota by using a mail service and registering with the state. It seems to take at least seven days for mail to get to South Dakota. As WINDSOR lives full-time in a camper, it takes at least another seven days for mail to be forwarded to whatever RV Park he is visiting. Because of attempts to murder him and recent death threats, safety requires that WINDSOR move a lot. This can cause additional delays.
3. WINDSOR must be served and communicated with at windsorinsouthdakota@yahoo.com.

WINDSOR MUST BE ISSUED AN ORDER ON HIS MOTION FOR REHEARING, AND HE MUST BE GIVEN THE PROPER TIME TO RESPOND TO ANY OBJECTION

1. Rule 44 (2) provides: “Any petition for the rehearing of an order denying a petition for a writ of certiorari or extraordinary writ shall be filed within 25 days after the date of the order of denial….”
2. There has been no “order of denial,” so the time has not started to run on rehearing.
3. WINDSOR is a private individual. He is not a nongovernmental corporation so a corporate disclosure statement is not appropriate or required.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Windsor respectfully requests:

1. that this Motion be granted;
2. that an order be issued confirming that there was a Conference of the nine justices in Case No. 22-7648;
3. that an order be issued reflecting the Due Process Notice and Service by Clerk of the Court, Scott S. Harris, on parties in Case No. 22-7648 of the valid record of the decision of the Petition by the Court;
4. that the Opinion of the Court be provided;
5. that the vote of each Justice be indicated in Case No. 22-7648;
6. that the Motion for Rehearing be docketed pursuant to Due Process;
7. that an order be issued that WINDSOR must be served and communicated with at windsorinsouthdakota@yahoo.com;
8. that this Motion be granted – motion Tto require confirmation of a Conference of the nine justices in Case No. 22-7648 and Issuance of an Order so confirming; order reflecting the valid record of the decision of the Petition by the Court in Case No. 22 7648, the Due Process Notice, and Service by Clerk of the Court, Scott S. Harris, of OPINION in Case No. 22-7648 on each party; Record of votes by each Justice in Case No. 22-7648; Order that the Motion for Rehearing be docketed pursuant to Due Process; that this Motion dated November 27, 2023 be docketed pursuant to Due Process; that Windsor be provided copies of all court records in the internal case management system of SCOTUS under Case No. 22-7648 at no charge, including all audit data; and if Case No. 22-7648 was not heard in Conference, that this Court file criminal charges against Scott S. Harris be docketed pursuant to Due Process; that Windsor be provided copies of all court records in the internal case management system of SCOTUS under Case No. 22-7648, at no charge, including all audit data; that Windsor be provided copies of letters and orders issued in every case considered in Conference since 02/01/2008; that if Case No. 22-7648 was not heard in Conference, that this Court file criminal charges against Scott S. Harris;
9. that this Court grant such other relief as is appropriate.

Submitted this 27th day of November 2023,

William M. Windsor

5013 S Louise Ave #1134

Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57108

352-###-####

WindsorInSouthDakota@yahoo.com

VERIFICATION

In accordance with 28 U.S.C.§1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct based upon my personal knowledge, except as to the matters herein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and that as to those matters, I believe them to be true.

FURTHER SAITH AFFIANT NOT.

This 27th day of November 2023,

William M. Windsor

5013 S Louise Ave #1134

Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57108

352-###-####

WindsorInSouthDakota@yahoo.com

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

I hereby certify that this Application has been prepared in Century 12-point font, one of the font and point selections approved by this Court and meets the requirements of this Court.

William M. Windsor

5013 S Louise Ave #1134

Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57108

352-###-####

WindsorInSouthDakota@yahoo.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, William M. Windsor, do swear that on this date, November 27, 2023, I have served the enclosed MOTION on the DEFENDANTS in the above proceeding or their counsel, and on every other person required to be served, by depositing an envelope containing the above documents in the United States mail properly addressed to each of them and with first-class postage prepaid, or by delivery to a third-party commercial carrier for delivery within 3 calendar days.

The names and addresses of those served are as follows:

Solicitor General of the United States

Room 5614, Department of Justice

950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20530–0001.

RYAN K. BUCHANAN – GABRIEL A. MENDEL

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY — ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY

600 United States Courthouse

75 Ted Turner Drive, S.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Telephone: 404-581-6000 — Facsimile: 404-581-6181

Email: gabriel.mendel@usdoj.gov

This 27th day of November 2023,

William M. Windsor

5013 S Louise Ave #1134

Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57108

352-###-####

WindsorInSouthDakota@yahoo.com

Motion for Rehearing filed at U.S. Supreme Court

On October 26, 2023, a Motion for Rehearing filed at U.S. Supreme Court by Bill Windsor. It was filed by Bill Windsor.

From March 2006 to the present, federal judges have acted in a corrupt manner and have committed a variety of felonies to damage Bill Windsor.

On May 15, 2023, a Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Prohibition was filed with the United States Supreme Court by Pro-Se Windsor.

Each year, approximately 8,000 petitions are filed, and all but an average of 180 are automatically denied.

Jake called Windsor from the office of Justice Clarence Thomas to say the Petition was docketed and would be considered by all nine of the justices. Windsor thought this was just a courtesy extended to all 8,000, but Jake explained that Windsor’s was one of about 180 from the 8,000 or so submitted that were deemed warranted for full consideration.

Jake was unaware of any Pro-Se party who ever had their request granted by the Supreme Court. Windsor found there had been one and only one in 1971.

On July 20, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court Docket showed the Petition was to be considered on September 26, 2023. “DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.”

On October 2, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court Docket indicates the Petition was denied. “Petition DENIED.”

SICKENING!!! Windsor has never received a letter. All the Clerk’s Office would finally say is that a letter was sent with one word: DENIED. There was no order issued.

There was no opinion issued, but there has to be. Here’s the process explained by the U.S. Supreme Court:

“The Court usually is not under any obligation to hear cases, and it usually only does so if the case could have national significance, might harmonize conflicting decisions in the federal Circuit courts, and/or could have precedential value.” In fact, the Court accepts approximately 180 of the more than 8,000 cases that it is asked to review each year.

Of the cases remaining after thousands are disposed of by not meeting the requitred criteraa, the Justices screen the problems closely—by a process they explain freely in outline. They meet in a conference room as secret as any in government. The Court keeps private matters private. Reporters may speculate; but details of discussion are never disclosed, and the vote is revealed only when a decision is announced. No outsider enters the room during conference. The junior Associate Justice acts as “doorkeeper,” sending for reference material, for instance, and receiving it at the door.

Five minutes before conference time, 9:30 or 10 a.m., the Justices are summoned. They exchange ritual handshakes and settle down at the long table. The Chief sits at the east end; the other Justices sit at places they have chosen in order of their seniority. Before each Justice is a copy of the day’s agenda. Each decides when he or she should refrain from taking any part in a case.

The Chief Justice opens the discussion, summarizing each case. The senior Associate Justice speaks next, and comment passes down the line. To be accepted for review, a case needs only four votes, fewer than the majority required for a decision on the case itself. Counsel for the litigants (and the almost never involved Pro-Se parties) are directed to submit their printed briefs so that each Justice has a set several weeks before argument.

Supreme Court historical documents state: “It acts only on matters of public record; it hears counsel’s arguments in public; all its orders and opinions are on the record; all materials presented to the Court for reaching its decisions are available to the public.

“All conference decisions are published. The disagreements among the Justices are fully exposed to the public in the written opinions, and on occasion the language of dissent becomes vehement.”

See the U.S. Supreme Court Docket for proof of the filings —

Windsor gave up on ever receiving this letter, and if he had received such an outrage, his motion for rehearing would be due the 27th. So, off it goes on October 26, 2023 for overnight delivery. Motion for Rehearing filed at U.S. Supreme Court by Bill Windsor

Windsor should be the second person in history and the first person in 52 years to have a Pro-Se Petition granted. There is no legal basis whatsoever for it to be denied. There is no legal basis for a petition that is considered to be denied with one word. There is no legal authority for a letter. There is no legal authority to conceal the vote.

The proper decision in this case should be a landmark decision for Pro-Se parties and those unable to afford to even be considered.

Windsor is demanding a grant of his Petition or an order with a full opinion and the votes of each of the nine justices. Windsor will file civil and criinal charges against all who voted against it. If this proves to be fraud by the Clerk’s Office, he will go after the Clerk.

William M. Windsor

I, William M. Windsor, am not a lawyer. This website expresses my OPINIONS. The comments of visitors or guest authors to the website are their opinions and do not therefore reflect my opinions. Anyone mentioned by name in any article is welcome to file a response. This website does not provide legal advice. I do not give legal advice. I do not practice law. This website is to expose government corruption, law enforcement corruption, political corruption, and judicial corruption. Whatever this website says about the law is presented in the context of how I or others perceive the applicability of the law to a set of circumstances if I (or some other author) was in the circumstances under the conditions discussed. Despite my concerns about lawyers in general, I suggest that anyone with legal questions consult an attorney for an answer, particularly after reading anything on this website. The law is a gray area at best. Please read our Legal Notice and Terms.

UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT HEARS WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR’S PETITION

MIDNIGHT SEPTEMBER 26, 2023. THE DAY HAS COME. THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT HEARS WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR’S PETITION.

Nine of the most famous people in America will sit down at a special conference table in the Supreme Court building in Washington, DC today and discuss me and my case.

It is historic for a pro se party to have done this. A WIN will make it even more historic — first pro se party to prevail at the United States Supreme Court in 52 years, and only the second in HISTORY.

This should set precedents that will be cited from now on. It will help all pro se parties and the 63% who cannot afford an attorney.

I don’t know when their opinion will be announced. I plan to call Jake, the Clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas, at the end of the day. I’ll apologize for calling, and I’ll ask if he can tell me what happened.

My Special Thanksgiving 2014 Revisited by Bill Windsor and Lawless America

Happiest of Thanksgivings to You and Yours from Bill Windsor and Lawless America.

I’ll be all alone this Thanksgiving. I’ll search DoorDash in search of turkey or Chinese about noon, but it will be a quiet day. I used to have a family and enjoyed many wonderful Thanksgivings with my former son, daughter, and my very special granddaughters, but fighting corruption took that away from me.

But enough of sad, please allow me to tell you about my Special Thanksgiving…

On October 28, 2014, I was in the 40th Judicial District Court in Waxahachie Texas for a hearing in civil case #88611 (William M. Windsor v. Joeyisalittlekid, et al). I was surprised to see Ellis County District Attorney Patrick Wilson and Ellis County Texas Sheriff Johnny Brown in the audience for the hearing as well as a small army of Ellis County Sheriff’s deputies. The hearing lasted from 1:30 pm to a little after 5:00 pm. It was the last hearing of the day, and it had nothing to do with the DA or the Sheriff.

I was detained on October 28, 2014 at approximately 5:30 pm by the Ellis County Sheriff’s Department as I left the courtroom. I was informed that there was a warrant from Montana.

I was taken to the Ellis County Jail. I was not given any paperwork or explanation as to why I was there. My personal property was taken from me. I had never been in jail, never charged with a crime, not even a traffic ticket or parking ticket in 15 years (now 23 years).

I was told that I had been granted a $100,000 bond and was given the opportunity to post bond for “violations of a protective order.” No details were given.

I am EXTREMELY claustrophobic, and the first two days were terrifying in that regard. I seriously questioned whether I could make it. I take medication nightly for claustrophobia, but I had no medicine with me, and speaking to an Ellis County Texas Jail staff member is like talking to a stump.

At 2:00 am on October 29, 2014, I was given a telephone call by Officer Jerri Smith. It was too late to reach anyone, and the telephones at the Ellis County Texas jail do not allow a message to be left on voice mail. I knew only two phone numbers – my former son and a woman I used to live with (who claims to be my ex-wife). I called them at least a dozen times each over the next three days. Neither of them ever accepted my calls, and they never did anything to help me. So much for so-called “family.” The feeling of being completely alone is a feeling that I hope I never experience again.

While I was told that my bond was set at $100,000, when I got bail bond companies to provide the bond, the Ellis County Jail refused to accept it.

I was then moved from the Booking Area to “O” Tank in the Ellis County Jail at about 4:00 pm on October 30, 2014. While in Booking, I was exposed to staph and MRSA as well as one extremely violent crazy man. I was really apprehensive about moving into “population.”

“O” Tank is a 24-man cell of approximately 1,500 square feet; 12 double bunks, three 8-seat iron picnic-style tables, three toilets, three sinks, two showers, cement block walls, cement floor, steel ceiling, bulletproof glass windows to the guard area, not bars. I immediately met Thomas Joe Edward Lee aka T.J. and several other young men, and I was relieved and felt comfortable. It was not scary as I anticipated. I never met anyone older than me, and 95% of the men there could have been my children or grandchildren. I’d estimate the average age to be 28. Other new friends made the first day in “O” Tank at the Ellis County Jail included Marquavius Woods (the only person other than me who I met out of hundreds who did not have tattoos); Jonathan Rima (a nice young man on crutches); Bryan (a tall guy who traded his semi-lumpy mattress for my giant lumps mattress); Michael McGowan (a handicapped black man who had been unable to obtain any help from his court-appointed attorney); Ignacio Galvan aka Nacho (nicknamed me Montana and “hazed” me the first night by saying the newest guy had to get up and turn out the lights – and there is no switch and the lights are always on); Zach (a really nice trustee with a hearing loss similar to mine); and Robert Davidson aka Jake or The Vape Master (a young guy who fell behind on court payments and got his probation revoked as a result).

I found that older men command almost universal respect in jail/prison. In addition to “Montana,” I was nicknamed Old School or School, for short. This is a common prison term for anyone seen as quite a bit older than you. That meant I was “School” to everyone. I later learned that “Pops” and “PawPaw” are also common. It seems that most people in jail must have called their grandfathers “PawPaw,” because I was called PawPaw a lot. As miserable as the experience was, I really did meet wonderful people. I cannot imagine what it would have been like without such kind people who immediately had my back, my front, and my sides. I was taken care of the whole time I was there as if I was actually the PawPaw to these guys. I was especially relieved to see how open the tank was as that really lessened the claustrophobia. My claustrophobia is so bad that I can’t even watch a movie where someone is in a small, restricted space.

My first jail meal other than bologna sandwiches served in a paper sack (“Johnny Sack”) in Booking was something that faintly resembled hamburger meat, two slices of bread, broccoli stems, two cookies, and a would-be Kool-Aid. I scarfed it down. I was so upset for the three days in Booking that I hadn’t eaten.

It may be hard for those who have never experienced this, but I made really good friends in jail with men and boys with whom I seemingly had very little in common. I found most of my fellow inmates to be extremely kind, very honest, and thankful for the smallest of gestures.

Most of my fellow inmates had little or absolutely NO money on their books. They couldn’t even buy a cracker.

Some men are lucky enough to have money on their books, so they can buy all kinds of things from the Commissary Lady. It saddened me to see the guys with no money. It had to be really hard on them to see what other guys were enjoying. I had money. I ended up giving away half of what I bought.

This is an actual photo of a Jail Spread meal. It tastes better than it looks. 🙂

The hottest Commissary item is called “soups” by the inmates. They are actually Ramen Noodle packages. They come in an array of flavors (usually very spicy), and soups are the #1 commodity behind bars. Sold by the Commissary Lady for 99 cents, a soup is an inexpensive meal for men who never got filled from the jail-sized servings at breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Hot water is used to cook the soups. And the many jailhouse chefs have concocted a wide variety of recipes for their soups. They use items saved from dinner or purchased from the Commissary. The fancier, multiple inmate meals are called “spreads.”

This is a fairly typical recipe for a Jail Spread — but much more spicy in Texas.

I’m not a cook, so when I enjoyed a soup, someone else did the cooking. I enjoyed a basic soup with beans, chili or tuna added. I enjoyed soup-based burritos, and best of all I enjoyed soup pizza. The pizza makers would get the spread participants to save their hot dogs at dinner and they cut them up as makeshift pepperonis. There is no end to the ultra-spicy commissary items, so the pizza could include anything from jalapeno Cheetos or spicy chili Fritos to real jalapenos, fire-alarm chili, spicy pickles, and more.

The cooking consists of hot water in a plastic bag, salvaged from some Commissary item or rescued before it hit a trash pile. The goop is mixed with hot water in the plastic bag, then covered with cardboard from the back of a legal pad and bath towels – all to keep the heat in.

Served with a side order of saltine crackers (99 cents for a full sleeve), these soups and spreads are surprisingly good. Claxton made a tuna spread for us in the Ellis County Texas Jail that remains my absolute favorite! It is amazing what you can convince yourself is good when you have little or nothing.

As Thanksgiving 2014 drew nearer, I learned that the Thanksgiving meal in the Ellis County Texas Jail is not very big or very good. I thought it would be great to do something for my fellow convicts, so I arranged for someone on the outside to put $50 on the books of four of my fellow prisoners. We then ordered $200 worth of the Commissary Lady’s finest spicy foods, soups, crackers, and the like so we could put together a huge Thanksgiving Spread.

I swear it looks a lot better to you in jail when you don’t have as much as you’d like to eat!

I wanted to keep my involvement a secret, but one or more of my helpers couldn’t help but blab, and everyone found out that I was responsible for the extra meal that we all enjoyed on Thanksgiving Day 2014.

You would have thought I had given them each a million dollars. The men were SO appreciative. Most of them had probably never experienced a random act of kindness.

We laughed and talked and ate, and a good time was had by all. 24 boys and men, all stuck in a place that none of us wanted to be. Most were guilty of drinking too much, using drugs, or being poor. All were victims of broken systems.

It may seem strange that my favorite Thanksgiving of all time will be Thanksgiving 2014 with 23 fellow prisoners, but I cannot imagine anything could ever top it. I am thankful for every boy and man I met in jail, thankful for their friendship, thankful for what I learned from them, and thankful that I can now crusade against the many wrongs of our broken penal system.

If you have a friend or relative in jail, I encourage you to put some money on their books. It will mean the world to them! It is better to give than to receive. Happy Thanksgiving!

I know that some of the guys are out and will read this article, so I cannot fail to mention my other friends from the Ellis County Jail in Waxahachie, Texas. These friends include Carlos Amador aka Paradise, Zachary Anderson, Cody Barnes, James Boyette aka The Boxer, David Bradshaw, Steven Calder aka The Enforcer, Lejonathan Cox, Greg Deloach, Cristoval Diaz, Brian Eaton, Michael Finch, Julian Fira, Donald Ford, Francisco Garcia, Justin Garcia aka Houston, Arcadio Garza, Michael Gonzales, Lonnie Hall, Michael Harvey, Robert Holland, Chris Horn, Robert Jack, Aaron Jones aka AJ or Lover Boy, Zackery Jones aka Locker, Greg Mason, Billy Mizer, Faustino Montemayor aka Claxton, James Myers aka Cellie, Heath Neitzel, Nicholas Parker, Eugenio Pena aka The Barber, Lonny Ramirez, Matthew Rauen, Bobby Rhodes aka Tank Boss, Benton Skelton, Louis Stocker aka Organized, Amber Vanderzwart, Gustavo Villanueva, Hector Villanueva. This does not include those who have been released or sent to The Big House, including Jacob Aparicio, Justin Johnston, John Florence, Jamie Ellis, Jordan Brittain, De’Juan Wilson, Aaron Drake, Terrance Marion, Drake Hernandez, Lawrence Murley, Scotty Stewart.

I will be announcing a special filming in Amarillo, Texas. I am asking every member of the Amarillo Police Department to be interviewed. I will have a 50,000-volt Axon Taser 26, and I will invite each policeperson to be shot with it. I’m thinking of offering a $50 million reward to anyone who can absorb 1,500,000 volts of electricity and still be alive. So far, Hunter Tyler Schreck is the only person in the world to have endured such torture much less live to tell about it.

Image copyright Friends of Bill Windsor

If you want to reach Bill Windsor, his email is windsorinsouthdakota@yahoo.com.

For the Lawless America videos, see www.YouTube.com/lawlessamerica. Bill Windsor’s Facebook page is www.facebook.com/billwindsor1 Bill Windsor’s Twitter account is www.twitter.com/lawlessamerica. And click here for the Lawless America Facebook page that magically reappeared.

#LawlessAmerica
#HunterTylerSchreck
#Corruption
#WilliamMWindsor
#BillWindsor
#AmarilloPoliceDepartment
#EllisCountyJail
#Thanksgiving

{jcomments on}

windsor bill 2014 10 28 mugshot ellis county jail 200w

William M. Windsor

I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney. This website expresses my OPINIONS. The comments of visitors or guest authors to the website are their opinions and do not therefore reflect my opinions. Anyone mentioned by name in any article is welcome to file a response. This website does not provide legal advice. I do not give legal advice. I do not practice law. This website is to expose government corruption, law enforcement corruption, political corruption, and judicial corruption. Whatever this website says about the law is presented in the context of how I or others perceive the applicability of the law to a set of circumstances if I (or some other author) was in the circumstances under the conditions discussed. Despite my concerns about lawyers in general, I suggest that anyone with legal questions consult an attorney for an answer, particularly after reading anything on this website. The law is a gray area at best. Please read our Legal Notice and Terms.

FABOJ

Texas Judge Cindy Ermatinger removed in Bill Windsor Case

Texas Judge Cindy Ermatinger has been removed as the judge in the Bill Windsor Case.

After a long battle, Judge Cindy Ermatinger is no longer the judge in Bill Windsor’s case in Ellis County Texas.

Filing a Motion for Recusal of a judge is not going to make the judge friendly toward you, and the effort usually fails….

Continue reading Texas Judge Cindy Ermatinger removed in Bill Windsor Case

Clerk of Court Melanie Reed is part of the Criminal Racketeering Operation in Ellis County Texas

Clerk of Court Melanie Reed is part of the Criminal Racketeering Operation in Ellis County Texas.

This happens all over the country. The court clerks know that the judges are committing crimes, and they do what they are told…committing violations of their oath, the rules, state civil statutes, state criminal statutes, and RICO statutes regarding organized crime.

Bill Windsor has suffered all types of abuse at the hands of Melanie Reed and her staff.

Continue reading Clerk of Court Melanie Reed is part of the Criminal Racketeering Operation in Ellis County Texas

64 senior judges and law enforcement officials asked to put Ellis County Texas Judge Cindy Ermatinger and District Attorneys Patrick Wilson and Ann Montgomery-Moran in prison.

64 senior judges and law enforcement officials asked to put Ellis County Texas Judge Cindy Ermatinger and District Attorneys Patrick Wilson and Ann Montgomery-Moran in prison.

Bill Windsor of Lawless America has communicated the charges to Presiding Judge Mary Murphy (shown left) and 63 others, including every senior judge in Texas, every law enforcement agency in Ellis County and Texas, the FBI, and much more…

Continue reading 64 senior judges and law enforcement officials asked to put Ellis County Texas Judge Cindy Ermatinger and District Attorneys Patrick Wilson and Ann Montgomery-Moran in prison.

Bill Windsor of Lawless America fights Texas attempts to send him to prison for 10 years

Bill Windsor of Lawless America is fighting Texas attempts to send him to prison for 10 years.

Bill Windsor has never committed a crime, but he is actively working to expose criminals in Ellis County Texas and elsewhere in the country, and it seems there is little that corrupt judges, court personnel, district attorneys, and law enforcement officers will not do to get someone they want got…

Continue reading Bill Windsor of Lawless America fights Texas attempts to send him to prison for 10 years

Bill Windsor of Lawless America has filed criminal charges against Ellis County Texas Judge and District Attorney

criminal-charges-crime-scene-tape-lawanswers-com-au-200w

Bill Windsor of Lawless America has filed criminal charges against Ellis County Texas Judge Cindy Ermatinger, Ellis County Texas District Attorney Patrick Wilson, and Assistant Ellis County District Attorney Ann Montgomery-Moran.

Judge Cindy Ermatinger, District Attorney Patrick Wilson and Assistant DA Ann Montgomery-Moran have conspired to have Bill Windsor charged with a crime. They have done this using fraudulent, forged documents and by destroying documents.

But Bill Windsor happens to have the evidence to prove what they have done.

Continue reading Bill Windsor of Lawless America has filed criminal charges against Ellis County Texas Judge and District Attorney

Montana Department of Justice says Judge accused of a crime should be investigated by that Judge – Bill Windsor Saga Continues

montana-department-of-justice-emblem-200w

Montana Department of Justice says Judge James A. Haynes, the judge accused of a crime, should be investigated by that Judge, Judge James A. Haynes. The Bill Windsor Saga continues.

Bill Windsor says this would be laughable if it wasn’t true and so serious…

Continue reading Montana Department of Justice says Judge accused of a crime should be investigated by that Judge – Bill Windsor Saga Continues