 |
Judge Thomas W. Thrash regularly commits crimes.
I have just completed a 5-part article that details all of the crimes and corrupt practices of Judge Thomas W. Thrash in just one lawsuit.
Now I’m going to explain why Judge Thrash commits crimes and summarize the various techniques that he uses to commit crimes while hiding behind his black robe….
In my cases, Judge Thomas W. Thrash commits crimes for the specific purpose of blocking my ability to expose the rampant corruption in the federal courts in Atlanta, Georgia. Judge Thrash and all of the federal judges in Georgia belong in prison.
To pursue criminal charges against judges, you need to document everything that is improper. It is my opinion that a pattern and practice of this wrongdoing establishes the crime of obstruction of justice.
I wrote an article a few months ago in which I listed the various techniques that judges use to commit crimes. I identified 21 techniques, and in just one lawsuit, Judge Thomas W. Thrash used 19 of the 21 corruption techniques.
1. Ignore the Law
One of the primary techniques used by corrupt judges is to simply ignore the law. I have carefully cited the statutes and overwhelming case law. The Defendants no not have the law on their side. Judge Thomas W. Thrash simply ignored the law and rules and ruled against me. Examples of this in Civil Action 1:11-CV-01922-TWT (“01922”) are shown with the failure to even address the requirement of remand when the case was blatantly illegally removed from Fulton County Superior Court to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; with the issuance of a filing injunction in violation of the clear law; with the dismissal of the case; and much more. On these matters, Judge Thomas W. Thrash simply IGNORED THE LAW. Of the 26 orders that Judge Thomas W. Thrash issued in 01922, there was absolutely no legal citation in 25 of the 26 orders.
Here are links to each of the orders in 01922: Order dated June 16, 2011 (Docket #19) — Order dated June 17, 2011 (Docket #25) — Order dated Jue 22, 2011 (Docket #29) — Order dated July 7, 2011 (Docket #41) — Order dated July 7, 2011 (Docket #42) — Order entered July 12, 2011 (Docket #43) — Order entered July 14, 2011 (Docket #48) — Order entered July 18, 2011 (Docket #49) — Order entered July 28, 2011 (Docket #53) — Order entered July 29, 2011 (Docket #56) — Order dated August 9, 2011 (Docket #62) — Order dated August 11, 2011 (Docket #66) — Order dated August 16, 2011 (Docket #67) — Order entered August 30, 2011 (Docket #73) — Order entered August 31, 2011 (Docket #75) — Order dated September 23, 2011 (Docket #83) — Order dated September 23, 2011 (Docket #84) — Order dated September 23, 2011 (Docket #86) — Order dated September 28, 2011 (Docket #93) — Order entered September 29, 2011 (Docket #98) — Order entered October 17, 2011 (Docket #112) — Order entered October 17, 2011 (Docket #113) — Order dated October 18, 2011 (Docket #115) — Order dated October 26, 2011 (Docket #116) — Order dated October 26, 2011 (Docket #117) — Order entered October 31, 2011 (Docket #124).
See Part 1 ¶¶4, 14. See Part 2, ¶22. See Part 3, ¶¶50, 67, 71. See Part 4, ¶¶81, 95, 98, 101, 105, 106, 120, 121. See Part 5, ¶¶134, 138, 155, 156, 159, 162, 164, 170.
2. Cite Invalid Law
Sometimes a judge will feel like citation of case law is needed to support their ruling. So, they claim a case applies when it doesn’t. Judge Thomas W. Thrash cited only six cases in 01922, so his favorite technique is to simply avoid the law. But in the one order of 26 where he cited a grand total of six (6) cases, all six (6) of the citations were invalid as they proved the position of William M. Windsor.
See Order dated September 23, 2011 (Docket #83). Judge Amy Totenberg issued one order in 01922 (Order dated July 1, 2011 (Docket #39)); she cited 10 cases, nine of which were invalid.
3. Ignore the Facts and/or Invent Facts
Judges don’t address points raised by parties who aren’t favored. Judge Thomas W. Thrash has lied about the facts in his orders, and lying under oath is perjury. Judges are always under oath, and a judge is supposed to never say or write anything that isn’t true. So, when a judge knowingly lies in orders for the purpose of ruling against a party for the judge’s criminal reasons, it is a criminal violation of perjury and obstruction of justice.
See Part 1, ¶14. See Part 2, ¶¶18, 22. See Part 3, ¶¶50, 67, 69. See Part 4, ¶¶81, 106, 120, 121. See Part 5, ¶¶134, 138, 155, 159, 162, 164, 172.
4. Ignore Issues
Another favorite technique is to simply ignore issues in orders. Judge Thomas W. Thrash always ignores the issues. As noted above, in 26 orders in 01922, Judge Thomas W. Thrash only addressed legal issues (erroneously) in one of the 26 orders. He completely ignored the legal issues. He did the same for the fact issues. In none of the 26 orders did he address the fact issues presented by me.
See the orders in paragraph #1 above.
5. Conceal Evidence
A really dishonest judge like Judge Thomas W. Thrash will simply conceal evidence. He simply conceals that evidence and refuses to allow it to see the light of day so his criminal efforts are not exposed. It is unbelievable the extent to which he did this. In some cases, he actually denied my right to file the evidence that was attached to motions.
See Part 2, ¶¶26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35. See Part 3, ¶¶37, 38, 39, 42, 43, 44, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 69. See Part 4, ¶¶78, 79, 81, 83, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 101, 106, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 120, 121. See Part 5, ¶¶ 134, 157, 159, 164, 167, 170, 171, 172.
6. Say Nothing in Orders
One of the favorite techniques of Judge Thomas W. Thrash and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ judges is to say nothing. They corruptly call an appeal “frivolous” and dismiss it with no explanation whatsoever. Sometimes the Eleventh Circuit writes a page or two simply reciting history of the case, so it appears it is a real order, and then they write one sentence dismissing the appeal with no valid reason or explanation.
Each of Judge Thomas W. Thrash’s orders says nothing…at least nothing valid. Most of the orders say nothing at all.
See the orders in paragraph #1 above.
7. Block Filing of Motions and Evidence
By allowing the favored party to file anything they choose and blocking the filings and motions of the pro se party, judges commit the worst form of obstruction of justice. The pro se party is denied the information needed to defeat the other party, and there is no record of this evidence and these arguments on appeal. Judge Thomas W. Thrash has done this to me repeatedly.
See Part 2, ¶¶26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35. See Part 3, ¶¶37, 38, 39, 42, 43, 44, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 69. See Part 4, ¶¶78, 79, 81, 83, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 101, 106, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 120, 121. See Part 5, ¶¶ 134, 157, 159, 164, 167, 170, 171, 172.
8. Tamper with Evidence
Tampering with evidence is a crime. Judges commit tampering with evidence by causing evidence submitted for filing to disappear and not get added to the court record. Judge Orinda D. Evans, Judge William S. Duffey, and Judge Thomas W. Thrash have done this to me repeatedly, in cahoots with the staff of the Clerk of the Court. I have proof that orders have been backdated.
See Part 2, ¶¶26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35. See Part 3, ¶¶37, 38, 39, 42, 43, 44, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 69. See Part 4, ¶¶78, 79, 81, 83, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 101, 106, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 120, 121. See Part 5, ¶¶ 134, 157, 159, 164, 167, 170, 171, 172.
9. Deny Constitutional Rights
The Constitution is meaningless to corrupt judges. They simply violate Constitutional rights with no regard for the people they damage. All of the judges that I have encountered have violated my Constitutional rights. I have been raped of my rights to due process. I have been denied the right to call witnesses, to testify under oath, to cross-examine witnesses, to introduce evidence, to file answers to motions filed by the favored party, to file lawsuits, to contact witnesses, and much more.
See Part 1 ¶¶4, 14. See Part 2, ¶18, 22, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35. See Part 3, ¶¶37, 38, 39, 42, 43, 44, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 69. See Part 4, ¶¶78, 79, 81, 83, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 101, 106, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 120, 121. See Part 5, ¶¶ 134, 157, 159, 164, 167, 170, 171, 172.
10. Violate and Ignore the Rules of Civil Procedure
By violating and ignoring the Rules of Civil Procedure and the Rules of Evidence, judges commit obstruction of justice. They allow the favored party to break rules and get away with it. For example, in my cases, the opposing parties have not filed a single affidavit as to facts for the last three years. The Local Rules of Civil Procedure require that all alleged statements of fact in motions and other filings must be supported by affidavit. This has not been done by the opposing parties since 2008, but every motion that I file has an affidavit or a sworn verification. Other rules are ignored as well so the favored parties can get away with just about anything.
See Part 2, ¶¶18, 22. See Part 3, ¶¶37, 50, 51, 52, 53, 67, 69, 71. See Part 4, ¶¶81, 101, 106, 120, 121. See Part 5, ¶¶134, 138, 155, 159, 162, 164, 170, 171. Also see all the motions listed in paragraph #7 above that I was denied the right to file.
11. Automatically Rule against Certain Classes of People
Judges automatically rule against certain classes of people. The concept of fair and impartial judges is a fairy tale. I have proven that people who represent themselves as plaintiffs in the federal courts in Atlanta always lose. We have a right to represent ourselves in court, but we automatically lose. Judges are simply attorneys in black dresses, and they seem to uniformly hate parties who aren’t spending a fortune with attorneys, so they screw them.
In the case of Judge Thomas W. Thrash, I have researched every case involving pro se plaintiffs in his career. There have been 183 pro se plaintiffs, and not one has ever won. 90% have had their cases dismissed. None have ever received their requested jury trial.
12. Order Monetary Sanctions against Parties they want to Damage
The criminal judges inflict damage on parties who aren’t favored by ordering monetary sanctions against them. They inflict financial punishment to break people. Judge Orinda D. Evans and Judge William S. Duffey have done this to me several times, and judges of the Eleventh Circuit have done it to me as well. Judge Thomas W. Thrash has not yet ordered monetary sanctions against me, probably because the Defendants have not (yet) filed motions for sanctions.
13. Refuse to Disqualify Themselves
The Constitution and case law clearly provide that we are supposed to be entitled to a fair and impartial judge, but the corrupt judges simply ignore the law. They refuse to disqualify themselves so they can inflict damage on parties who aren’t favored. This has happened with Judge Orinda D. Evans, Judge William S. Duffey, Judge Thomas W. Thrash, and every judge with the Eleventh Circuit.
Judge Thomas W. Thrash never ruled on the Motion to recuse that I filed. So, I filed a second motion to recuse, and he had the Clerk of the Court intercept and destroy it. See Part 2, ¶24. See Part 3, ¶¶41, 47, 53, 62.
14. Violate their Oath of Office and the Code of Judicial Conduct
Like the rules of civil procedure, a judge’s Oath of Office and Code of Judicial Conduct READ great. But the judges pay no attention to the Oath or Code. When they intentionally violate their Oath and the Code of Judicial Conduct, they are intentionally damaging a party.
See Part 1, ¶14. See Part 2, ¶¶18, 22. See Part 3, ¶¶50, 67, 69. See Part 4, ¶¶81, 106, 120, 121. See Part 5, ¶¶134, 138, 155, 159, 162, 164, 171, 172.
15. Conspire with Fellow Judges and Judicial Employees
The corrupt judges commit conspiracy with their fellow judges and judicial employees. They often need help from other judges as well as law clerks, the employees in the Office of the Clerk of the Court, and others.
See paragraph #7 above.
16. Allow Perjury
Dishonest judges allow a favored party to lie and cheat. The felony of perjury is ignored. This is an excellent way for a crooked judge to allow a favored party who is dishonest to obstruct justice. When the judge knows the testimony is perjured, the judge is suborning perjury when he or she does nothing about it and accepts the perjury as if it was fact. Judge Orinda D. Evans and Judge William S. Duffey have done this as have the judges of the Eleventh Circuit. Judge Thomas W. Thrash has committed multiple counts of perjury.
See Part 1 ¶14. See Part 2, ¶¶18, 22. See Part 3, ¶¶50, 67, 69. See Part 4, ¶¶77, 81, 106, 120, 121. See Part 5, ¶¶134, 138, 155, 159, 162, 164, 171, 172.
17. Deny Hearings
In the federal courts in Fulton County Georgia, it is extremely difficult to get a hearing. In six years, I gave never been granted a hearing. Hearings are dangerous for dishonest judges as courtroom observers, media, and the transcript of the hearing will force the judges to be a little more honest.
18. Practice Simulated Litigation
Dishonest judges don’t issue valid orders, and they don’t maintain legal dockets. I guess this makes it easier for them to manipulate things. Judge William S. Duffey and the Clerk of the Court have done this to me. None of Judge Thrash’s orders are legal. None of these orders are signed and bear the seal of the court as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1691:
Order dated June 16, 2011 (Docket #19) — Order dated June 17, 2011 (Docket #25) — Order dated Jue 22, 2011 (Docket #29) — Order dated July 7, 2011 (Docket #41) — Order dated July 7, 2011 (Docket #42) — Order entered July 12, 2011 (Docket #43) — Order entered July 14, 2011 (Docket #48) — Order entered July 18, 2011 (Docket #49) — Order entered July 28, 2011 (Docket #53) — Order entered July 29, 2011 (Docket #56) — Order dated August 9, 2011 (Docket #62) — Order dated August 11, 2011 (Docket #66) — Order dated August 16, 2011 (Docket #67) — Order entered August 30, 2011 (Docket #73) — Order entered August 31, 2011 (Docket #75) — Order dated September 23, 2011 (Docket #83) — Order dated September 23, 2011 (Docket #84) — Order dated September 23, 2011 (Docket #86) — Order dated September 28, 2011 (Docket #93) — Order entered September 29, 2011 (Docket #98) — Order entered October 17, 2011 (Docket #112) — Order entered October 17, 2011 (Docket #113) — Order dated October 18, 2011 (Docket #115) — Order dated October 26, 2011 (Docket #116) — Order dated October 26, 2011 (Docket #117) — Order entered October 31, 2011 (Docket #124).
19. Dismiss Cases or Grant Summary Judgments
Dishonest judges ignore the law and violate the law by dismissing cases or by granting summary judgment. This is done regularly. This keeps the honest party from the right to have a jury make the decision.
Judge Thomas W. Thrash dismissed this case. There is no legal basis for dismissing a declaratory judgment action of this type. The one and only result from such an action is for the STATE court to declare what the statute means.
See Part 4, ¶118, 123. See Part 5, ¶170, 171.
20. Deny Jury Trials
Judges corrupt the judicial process by depriving parties of a jury trial. Juries can’t be controlled by the judges to ensure that their favored party wins, so judges end cases before the people who should win can reach a jury. Judge Orinda D. Evans and Judge William S. Duffey have done this to me, but I did not request a jury trial in this case as it is not allowed with a declaratory judgment action such as 01922. Instead, Judge Thomas W. Thrash illegally allowed the case to be removed from Fulton County Superior Court so he denied me the legal right to have a Georgia state court judge issue the required ruling.
21. Don’t Publish the Improper Orders
None of the orders in this case have been published. The Eleventh Circuit has NEVER published one of the orders in my appeals. When they are violating the law, they have protection by not publishing the order. This keeps it from the eyes of attorneys and other judges who would identify the wrongdoing. Publishing would also make their erroneous decisions precedents for other cases. The whole legal system would be turned even more upside down if this were to happen.
Judge Thomas W. Thrash is Corrupt. He commits crimes.
Corruption is the abuse of power by a public official. Judicial corruption is dishonesty by a judge. Corruption does not have to be economic in character. A police officer who fabricates evidence against a person he believes to be guilty of paedophilia is not committing an economic crime; and he might do so because he believes the accused to be guilty, and does not want him to go unpunished. Economics is not necessarily involved as an element of the officer’s crime or as a motivation. When police do wrong they are often motivated by a misplaced sense of justice, rather than by financial reward. Again, a person in authority motivated by sadistic pleasure who abuses her power by meting out cruel and unjust treatment to those subject to her authority, is not engaging in an economic crime; and she is not motivated by economic considerations. Judges and many of those who occupy positions of authority are motivated by a desire to exercise power for its own sake, rather than by a desire for financial reward. See Part 1 ¶¶14. See Part 2, ¶¶18, 22. See Part 3, ¶¶50, 67, 69. See Part 4, ¶¶77, 81, 106, 120, 121. See Part 5, ¶¶134, 138, 155, 159, 162, 164, 171, 172.
William M. Windsor
I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney. This website expresses my OPINIONS. The comments of visitors to the website are their opinions and do not therefore reflect my opinions. This website does not provide legal advice. I do not give legal advice. I do not practice law. This website is to expose corruption in government, law enforcement, and the judiciary. Whatever this website says about the law is presented in the context of how I or others perceive the applicability of the law to a set of circumstances if I (or some other author) was in the circumstances under the conditions discussed. Despite of my concerns about lawyers in general, I suggest that anyone with legal questions consult an attorney for an answer, particularly after reading anything on this website. The law is a gray area at best. Please read our Legal Notice and Terms.
{jcomments on}