Orly Taitz – The Queen of the Birthers


One of my hundreds of phone calls from the last three weeks was from Orly Taitz.

 I was finally able to return her call today, and we had a great chat.

If you don’t know the name “Orly Taitz,” you will know about the efforts of the birthers with President Obama’s birth status.

Orly wants to team up with us in the battle against governmental corruption….



Continue reading Orly Taitz – The Queen of the Birthers

Windsor files Petition for Rehearing with U.S. Supreme Court

On November 29, 2010, The United States Supreme Court denied a Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed by me.  It was a one-word ruling: DENIED.

The justices of our Supreme Court were told that the federal judges in Atlanta are corrupt and are violating the Constitution.  Nothing was filed against me, so my Petition was uncontroverted, uncontested.

On December 6, 2010, I sent a Petition for Rehearing to The Supreme Court, and I gave them notice of potential criminal action against them.

Continue reading Windsor files Petition for Rehearing with U.S. Supreme Court

Supreme Court says Judicial Corruption is not Worthy




The United States Supreme Court will soon issue a landmark decision on the validity of the Constitution of the United States, and on November 29, the justices signaled how they will likely vote.

I would have been surprised if they had granted this, but this is very discouraging.  I would think that if honest judges were told that the federal judges in Atlanta are corrupt and are violating the Constitution, they would act.  We’ll see what happens on the vital petitions for writs of mandamus, but I now suspect they will essentially void big hunks of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Continue reading Supreme Court says Judicial Corruption is not Worthy

Some Ideas for Fixing the Judicial Corruption Problem

Here are my thoughts about what can be done to fix this problem:

  1. Rescind all lifetime appointments for federal judges.  See how countries handle this that are successful, and copy their system.
  2. Name an independent prosecutor to investigate all reports of judicial corruption, and indict and impeach the crooks.
  3. Let corporations represent themselves in legal proceedings.  This will allow companies to be able to afford to defend themselves.  It will reduce legal fees. 
  4. Have attorneys in every federal district and circuit to assist pro se parties at no charge.  Pro se parties now represent approximately one-third of all parties in lawsuits.
  5. Increase the size of the House of Representatives.  A nice man has sent me his detailed study of this issue, and he accurately reports that our forefathers said we need representatives with a far fewer number of constituents than we have now.
  6. Return The Supreme Court to the role of a court of appeals.  Require that The Supreme Court rule on every petition submitted to it.  Let them hire all the people they need to do this.  Increase the number of justices by having more than one panel, if necessary.
  7. Have Congress modify 28 U.S.C. 455 to make it clear that judges have to recuse themselves in specific circumstances, including if they are party to a lawsuit with a litigant.  Make it clear that bias can be demonstrated by actions in a lawsuit so the judges can’t claim the only bias is extra-judicial.
  8. Establish a body that handles judicial misconduct complaints that is not within the judiciary.  Judges policing their fellow judges is a sick joke.  Make all judicial complaints public.
  9. Establish cause for termination of a judge.  If a judge states as facts in orders information that can be proven to be false from the record before the Court, that’s cause.  If they use erroneous law or ignore the valid precedents, that’s cause.
  10. Require that all points be addressed in every district court decision.
  11. Require that all points of error be addressed in every appellate decision.
  12. End judicial “interpretation.”  Let’s have laws, and let’s go by them.  Park some people in an office somewhere, and have them go through cases to identify legal issues.  Make a recomemndation as to how to eliminate the gray areas, and feed those to Congress to amend statutes or enact new law.
  13. End judicial immunity.  Have Congress enact a statute that removes immunity.  Make judges accountable and liable personally for actions under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and Bivens.  Make the Bivens ruling (right to sue federal government officials) a statute.
  14. Disbar all the attorneys who violate their Code of Professional Conduct.
  15. Enact a statute that lets perjury be a cause of action in a civil suit.
  16. Require judges to insist that people tell the truth in court with extreme consequences for those who don’t.
  17. Require that attorneys go by the letter of every law and every professional rule.  Have onerous consequences for anyone who violates anything.
  18. End “motion practice” in federal courts.  Require that judges hold conferences and speak to attorneys and pro se parties when there are serious issues.
  19. Enact a statute that does not allow judges to enter summary judgments when a jury trial has been requested.  Take everything out of the hands of judges except application of precise laws.
  20. Enact a statute that does not allow judges to ignore or change the rules.
  21. Give parties some avenue for recourse when there is attorney misconduct and/or judicial misconduct in a case.
  22. Require that all decisions are published.  This will require judges to be much more honest.  They can’t hide their corrupt rulings as easily.
  23. Require that all orders must be signed by the judges involved.
  24. Require that votes of each judge involved in a decision are made part of the public record.
  25. Eliminate the fraud in court clerk offices.
  26. Eliminate the requirement that materials have to be provided to The Supreme Court in an odd-sized booklet that has to be commercially printed and thus forces appeals to The Supreme Court to be very expensive.
  27. Minimize paper filings.  Convert to electronic filings for everyone.  Pass a national law accepting digital signatures, or allow a scanned signature page with the original to follow by mail.
  28. Eliminate the requirement of a legal degree and experience in judge elections in cities, counties, and states.
  29. Return the Constitutional power of “Presentment” to citizen grand juries. 
  30. Establish more political parties in hopes of more honesty in government.
  31. Find 4,100 truly honest people, and make them federal judges, senators, and representatives.

Those are my thoughts for the moment.  I’ll add more later.  Please feel free to add your ideas.


More Information

29.  Return the Constitutional power of “Presentment” to citizen grand juries.

The 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution says in part as follows: “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury . . . .”

“‘A presentment, properly speaking, is an accusation, made by a grand jury of its own mere motion, of an offence upon its own observation and knowledge, or upon evidence before it, and without any bill of indictment laid before it at the suit of the government. Upon a presentment, the proper officer of the court must frame an indictment, before the party accused can be put to answer it.’”

So, government officials prepare an indictment and lay it before the grand jury. On the contrary, the presentment originates in the grand jury. The grand jury discovers an offense on its own. It observes and collects evidence of the offense and the government has nothing to do with it. So the grand jury is independent. The court then prepares the indictment based on the presentment.

Here is Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (FRCP): “An offense which may be punished by death shall be prosecuted by indictment. An offense which may be punished by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year or at hard labor shall be prosecuted by indictment. . . .”

As you see, there is no mention of “presentments.” But Note 4 of the Advisory Committee Notes on the Rules says this: “4. Presentment is not included as an additional type of formal accusation, since presentments as a method of instituting prosecutions are obsolete, at least as concerns the Federal courts.”

But a rule or a statute cannot amend the Constitution.  So this is absolutely clear to judges, law enforcement, and attorneys, Congress needs to amend Rules 6 and 7 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to properly include presentment.

See Alan Stang articleLiberty for Life articleDC Dave articleAmerican Grand Jury articleCountyGrandJury.org

William M. Windsor

Proof of the False Sworn Pleadings Filed Against Me by Maid of the Mist

My saga began on August 25, 2005 when Christopher Glynn, President of Maid of the Mist in Niagara Falls, signed an affidavit that consisted of 50 paragraphs  46 of those SWORN statements were false.  I have proven them false with Glynn’s subsequent testimony and the testimony of his fellow managers, Timothy P. Ruddy and Robert J. Schul.

Here is the documentation filed with the Court that references various depositions and other evidence that is on the record that proves the false sworn complaint.

Judge Evans never discussed this.  Refused to consider it.  She refused over 30 attempts on my part to get a hearing or a conference to discuss it.  When it was raised in her presence, she said she wasn’t gpoing to discuss it.  So, she allowed massive perjury.

I began trying to reopen this case in 2009, and Judge Evans has continued to lie about everything.  Maid of the Mist has never filed an affidavit even attempting to dispute any of my sworn statements.

This is a case in which the Plaintiffs, Maid of the Mist, their attorneys, and the federal judges have all committed a significant number of criminal offenses.  And there isn’t a government authority that will do a thing about it.

Judge Evans granted a summary judgment as if the complaint was valid.  She did so for corrupt reasons.  Her order is simply fantasy, and the record of the court proves it.  Here is documentation of her Summary Judgment Order.

Supreme Court Justice Thomas signals his vote on Landmark Decision on the Constitution


The United States Supreme Court will soon issue a landmark decision on the validity of the Constitution of the United States, and on November 19, Justice Thomas signaled how he will likely vote.

On a simple Application for a Stay (hold on proceedings in the lower courts) until The Supreme Court rules on the Petitions, Justice Thomas denied the Application.

Perhaps Justice Thomas had some valid reason for such an order, but his order consisted of one word: “denied.” 

Justice Thomas violated The Supreme Court’s own “law” in Corcoran v. Levenhagen by issuing an order with no explanation. 

I read this to indicate how Justice Thomas will vote.  I believe he is likely to vote to allow the federal judges to continue to commit crimes and violate our Constitutional rights.  I look forward to apologizing to him if he votes against the corruption!

The Supreme Court will consider these questions in three petitions filed by me::  

  1.  Will The Supreme Court declare that the Constitution and its amendments may be voided by the federal judges in Atlanta, Georgia? 
  2. Should federal judges be stopped from committing illegal and corrupt acts to obstruct justice and inflict bias on litigants?   
  3. Will The Supreme Court be afraid to disclose the corruption in the federal courts?

I have discovered that, at least in Atlanta, Georgia, the federal courts operate like a police state in which the judges are all-powerful, committing criminal acts from their benches high above the courtooms and violating the Constitutional rights of tens of thousands of parties who have the misfortune of appearing in their courts.  After finding nothing but corruption at the federal district courts and the court of appeals, I have put the justices of The United States Supreme Court on the hot seat.  By filing Petitions for Writs of Mandamus rather than an appeal, The Supreme Court is forced to deal with the issue.  And the fundamental issue is whether the corruption extends all the way to the top.  Is The United States Supreme Court corrupt, too? 

If The Supreme Court fails to act against these federal judges, the citizens of the United States need to know that there is not a shred of deceny, honesty, or Constitutional rights in our federal courts.  Corruption has consumed the federal court system, and we now live in a police state.  Judges are free to do absolutely anything they want.  Our laws are meaningless.  Your life savings can be stolen by a federal judge, and they have no risk in violating every law in the books.

The Supreme Court may render its decision before the end of the year.  The accused judges have been given until December 15, 2010 to file their response.  That will be an interesting day.  My guess is that none of the judges will respond.  I believe that because I doubt that a federal judge wants to commit perjury in a filing with The Supreme Court.


News Coverage:


The story is now on 58,000 web pages.  Just do a search for “Supreme Court to issue Landmark Decision on the Constitution.”