Right to Appeal Voided in Corrupt Federal Courts in Georgia

tjoflat-gerald-bard

82-year-old federal Judge Gerald Bard Tjoflat has announced that the right to file an appeal no longer exists in federal courts.

At least it doesn’t exist if your name is Windsor.

In a shocking order, Judge Tjoflat and his running buddies, Judge Ed Carnes, and Judge William H. Pryor, have denied my wife’s right to appeal….

 

Continue reading Right to Appeal Voided in Corrupt Federal Courts in Georgia

Grand Juries should be the Answer to Corruption — State Representative Harry Geisinger meets with Bill Windsor

grand-jury-room-2-200w

 

Article of Amendment V of the Bill of Rights gives grand juries the power of Presentment.  In a Presentment, the grand jury independently brings charges, usually against corrupt government officials.

Bill Windsor spent the afternoon of March 28, 2011 at the Fulton County Courthouse trying to get the Fulton County Georgia Grand Jury to consider criminal charges against 14 Atlanta federal judges.

The Grand Jury has been presented with the facts regarding judicial corruption and criminal acts by federal judges with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

Now the effort is to get the necessary elected official to sign the petition.  That meeting is tomorrow…

Continue reading Grand Juries should be the Answer to Corruption — State Representative Harry Geisinger meets with Bill Windsor

Supreme Court Justices have lost Legal Jurisdiction to Hear Cases

corruption-everyone-pays-300w

On March 8, 2011,The U.S. Supreme Court issued orders in Docket No. 10-632, 10-633, and 10-690 in which the justices refused to honor their oath to defend the Constitution.

Each justice took oaths required to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic” and to “bear true faith and allegiance to the same.”

But in violating that sacred oath, the Supreme Court no longer has legal jurisdiction to hear cases.  Congress must impeach the entore court as soon as possible. I

Continue reading Supreme Court Justices have lost Legal Jurisdiction to Hear Cases

Supreme Court Refuses to Honor Oath to Defend Constitution

district-of-columbia-washington-supreme-court-3500000-061031i0006-cropped-250w

On February 22, 2011, The U.S. Supreme Court issued an order in Docket No. 10-411 in which the justices refused to honor their oath to defend the Constitution.

Each justice took oaths required to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic” and to “bear true faith and allegiance to the same.”

But in the fifth petition presented to The Supreme Court in the last three months asking the Court to declare that federal judges do not have the right to ignore the Constitution, the Court refused again.

Continue reading Supreme Court Refuses to Honor Oath to Defend Constitution

Another Complaint against Judges of the Eleventh Circuit in Atlanta — Murder Cover-Up

hull_frank_m-judge-195w

 

Renee J. McGhee writes this story about her son, Steven Lamond Johnson. 

Ms. McGhee says her son was murdered in Macon, Georgia by a probation officer while her son was handcuffed.

Judge Frank M. Hull (shown here) is one of three federal judges at the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals who Ms. McGhee says lied and covered up the murder.

Continue reading Another Complaint against Judges of the Eleventh Circuit in Atlanta — Murder Cover-Up

Fulton County Georgia Grand Jury asked to consider Criminal Charges against 14 Federal Judges

crowd-business-4668785931_9b99aea36f_o-cropped-300w

 

The Fulton County Georgia Grand Jury has been asked to consider criminal charges against 14 Atlanta federal judges.

The Grand Jury has been presented with the facts regarding judicial corruption and criminal acts by federal judges with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit….

Continue reading Fulton County Georgia Grand Jury asked to consider Criminal Charges against 14 Federal Judges

Expert says Fraud in U.S. Supreme Court Records received by William M. Windsor from the Office of Clerk Suter

wksuter03

 

Were the petition and application of William M. Windsor reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court? 

There is no way to tell!!!  No valid judicial records have been discovered so far and in the most recent response from the office of Clerk Suter, false and deliberately misleading records have been produced by the Supreme Court of the United States.

Records received by William M. Windsor from the office of Supreme Court Clerk William K. Suter have led to the posting of an opinion of fraud by the office of Clerk Suter of the U.S. Supreme Court…. 

Los Angeles, February 10 –  Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), has recently filed a request with the U.S. Congress for impeachment of Clerk Suter of the U.S. Supreme Court, for Deprivation of Rights:  

  • Denying petitioners and applicants the Due Process right of notice and service of orders of the Court, and
  • Denying the People access to the judicial records of the court. [[i]]

Human Rights Alert further noted, that the U.S. Supreme Court, where valid judicial records in numerous cases are nowhere to be found, today fails to meet fundamental standards of an honest tribunal. [[ii]]

Now, additional records, received by petitioner William M. Windsor from the office of Clerk Suter, led to the posting of opinion of fraud by the office of Clerk Suter of the U.S. Supreme Court. [[iii]]

Windsor has been trying for sometime to discover, whether petitions and applications, which he filed with the U.S. Supreme Court in effort to protect his rights, were at all reviewed by the Court:

  • The online dockets of the Supreme Court of the United States note denial of Windsor’s petition and application on January 18, 2011.  However, Windsor has not been duly served by Clerk Suter with the order of denial.
  • Consequently, Windsor has unsuccessfully attempted to discover valid judicial records of the presumed January 18, 2011, review and denial of his petition and application. [[iv]]
  • On January 18-21, 2011, Mr George McDermott of Maryland, unrelated to the case, attempted to access the paper and electronic files and judicial records of the U.S. Supreme Court, pertaining to Mr Windsor and others.  The office of Clerk Suter denied access to the records. [[v]]
  • Later, as further effort to discover whether his case was at all reviewed by the Supreme Court, Windsor filed a Motion for an Order by the Court on Clerk William S. Suter for Service of Valid Evidence of Denial.  On February 8, 2011, the Motion was stamped “Received” by the office of the Clerk of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Now, Windsor received a response from the office of Clerk Suter on his February 8, 2011 Motion:

  • A February 8, 2011 letter was issued on behalf of Clerk William Suter, signed by Ms Cynthia Rapp, with no notation of her authority.
  • The enclosure to the February 8, 2011 Ms Rapp letter includes a copy of a record, which is an unsigned January 18, 2011 Order, denying Windsor’s Petition (10-690). Unsigned judicial records are invalid ones.
  • The copy of the unsigned January 18, 2011 unsigned Order was further stamped “True Copy,” but the signature on the “True Copy” stamp was an invalid signature as well.

Based on such records, Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert, has issued a statement:

In the February 8, 2011 letter, invalid records are provided to William M. Windsor on behalf of Clerk William Suter of the US Supreme Court. Moreover, the February 8, 2010 letter, signed by Ms Cynthia Rapp, demonstrates ongoing efforts to mislead Mr Windsor that he has been served with valid records pertaining to the denial of his petition and application (10-690 and 10-A690) by the Supreme Court of the United States.

In addition, Dr. Zernik, PhD, has opined that conduct of the office of Clerk William Suter in this case amounts to Fraud.

Dr. Zernik has accumulated substantial experience in examining records of the U.S. and state courts, of U.S. prisons, as well as U.S. banking records.  His opinions regarding such records were often supported by leading experts in related fields. [[vi]]  His reviews regarding computerized court and prison records in the United States were published in international, peer-reviewed computer science journal. [[vii], [viii]]  Report authored by Dr. Zernik on behalf of Human Rights Alert (NGO), was incorporated into official United Nations report with reference to “Corruption of the courts and the legal profession” in California. [[ix]]

LINKS

[i] 11-01-25 Request for Impeachment of US Supreme Court Clerk William Suter
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47539382/
[ii] 11-02-08 Where Are the Missing Records of the Supreme Court of the United States?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48414184/
[iii] 11-02-10 Windsor v Maid of the Mist Corporation (10-690 and 10-A690) – Fraud opined in U.S. Supreme Court records, received by Mr Windsor from office of Clerk Suter
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48596120/
[iv] 11-01-28 Press Release: Windsor v Maid of the Mist (10-A690) in the U.S. Supreme Court – Alleged “Shell Game Fraud”

http://www.scribd.com/doc/47778291/
[v] 11-01-22 Declaration of George McDermott in re: Attempt to Access U.S. Supreme Court Paper and Electronic Records to Inspect and to Copy
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47455844/
[vi] 11-01-06 Joseph Zernik, PhD, Biographical Sketch
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/
[vii] 10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining as a Civic Duty “Online Public Prisoners” Registration Systems, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining 1: 84-96 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328591/
[viii] 10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked U.S. Federal Courts, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining, 1:69-83 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328585/
[ix] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the  United Nations Human Rights Council  for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/

Obstruction of Justice at The Supreme Court

people-man-3500000-070113s0297-cropped-300w

 

The Clerk’s Office of The United States Supreme Court is committing obstruction of justice and violating Constitutional and legal rights.

 I have written to the Clerk of the Court, William K. Suter, to request an appointment. 

I have called asking to speak to him, but they refuse to put my calls through to him or his assistant or anyone else.

I am now collecting evidence of illegal practices of the Clerk’s Office and the United States Supreme Court….

Continue reading Obstruction of Justice at The Supreme Court

Who is this Man…and Why is he Smiling?

tom-price-headshot-from-site-small

 

Who is this man, and why is he smiling?

This is my congressman, Congressman Tom Price.

I believe he is smiling because he is happy ignoring his constituents and the problems that we face in America.

I have asked Congress to impeach 27 federal judges, and Mr. Price replied that he is prohibited from becoming involved in matters dealing with the justice system….

Continue reading Who is this Man…and Why is he Smiling?

Congress asked to Impeach 27 Federal Judges for Corruption

district-of-columbia-washington-capitol-800000-washington dc 068-300w

 

Congress has been asked to conduct public hearings and impeach 27 federal judges.

Last year, I wrote to every member of the House and Senate judiciary committees.  I asked them to take action against corrupt federal judges.  Only Senator Arlen Specter responded.  He referred me to my Senator, and Senator Saxby Chambliss said he couldn’t get involved.  Not a single solitary person anywhere in the federal government has responded or done a thing about this.

Well I have now written to EVERY member of the House and Senate.

I have asked Congress to impeach 14 federal judges in Atlanta, four in Washington DC, and the nine justices of the United States Supreme Court….

 

 

Continue reading Congress asked to Impeach 27 Federal Judges for Corruption