Supreme Court says Judicial Corruption is not Worthy

 

 

The United States Supreme Court will soon issue a landmark decision on the validity of the Constitution of the United States, and on November 29, the justices signaled how they will likely vote.

I would have been surprised if they had granted this, but this is very discouraging.  I would think that if honest judges were told that the federal judges in Atlanta are corrupt and are violating the Constitution, they would act.  We’ll see what happens on the vital petitions for writs of mandamus, but I now suspect they will essentially void big hunks of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

An order was entered today by The Supreme Court on William M. Windsor’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari (appeal) of one of the most horrendous of the orders by the corrupt judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.  The Petition was denied.  See:

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-411.htm

This may tell us how The Supreme Court will rule on judicial corruption and the ability for federal judges to void parts of the Constitution and Bill of Rights because essentially the same questions were asked as in my petitions for writs of mandamus:

“There is no legal or factual basis whatsoever for the decisions of the lower courts in this matter.  These rulings were issued for corrupt reasons.  Many of the judges in the Northern District of Georgia and the Eleventh Circuit are corrupt and violate laws and rules, as they have done in this case.  The Supreme Court must recognize this Petition as one of the most serious matters ever presented to this Court.

“The key questions are:

1.    Whether federal courts must be stopped from operating corruptly and ignoring all laws, rules, and facts.

2.    Whether the Supreme Court is prepared to declare the Constitution and its amendments null and void.”

The differences are that The Supreme Court doesn’t have any obligation to deal with a petition for writ of certiorari, but they do have to deal with petitions for writs of mandamus.  In 2009, only 1.1 of 100 petitions for writs of certiorari were granted cert, which means they approved them for further consideration.  However, the reason for granting certiorari is allegedly when a case may set an important precedent.  With this decision, they had an opportunity to deal with the corruption, and didn’t….

I would have been surprised if they had granted this, but this is very discouraging.  I would think that if honest judges were told that the federal judges in Atlanta are corrupt and are violating the Constitution, they would act.  We’ll see what happens on the vital petitions for writs of mandamus, but I now suspect they will essentially void big hunks of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

What in the world are we going to do if they rule this way on the petitions for writs of mandamus?  We will know that our Supreme Court justices are corrupt, too.

I will continue to update the home page of www.lawlessamerica.com with the latest developments.

Please pass this news along.  One of our only hopes is if we can reach enough people through email because the mainstream media is afraid of the judges.

Thanks,

William M. Windsor