Anatomy of a Corrupt Lawsuit perpetrated by Federal Judge Thomas W. Thrash – Part 1

thrash-thomas

Federal Judge Thomas W. Thrash is a criminal.  Unfortunately, he continues to commit crimes while hiding behind his black robe and a mega-ugly scowl.

Judges commit crimes in a wide variety of ways.  They attempt to disguise their crimes by committing them while pretending to be doing their jobs.

It can take a lot of work to understand what they are doing, but in this relatively simple case, all it takes is a little reading….

Continue reading Anatomy of a Corrupt Lawsuit perpetrated by Federal Judge Thomas W. Thrash – Part 1

Criminal Charges filed against Fulton County Georgia Superior Court Judge Jerry W. Baxter

baxter-jerry

Criminal charges have been filed against Fulton County Georgia Superior Court Judge Jerry W. Baxter.

Judge Jerry Baxter has been charged with Perjury, Obstruction of Justice, Misprision of Felonies, and RICO.

Charges were filed with the Federal Bureau of Investigation Task Force on Judicial Corruption in Georgia….

Continue reading Criminal Charges filed against Fulton County Georgia Superior Court Judge Jerry W. Baxter

Expert says Fraud in U.S. Supreme Court Records received by William M. Windsor from the Office of Clerk Suter

wksuter03

 

Were the petition and application of William M. Windsor reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court? 

There is no way to tell!!!  No valid judicial records have been discovered so far and in the most recent response from the office of Clerk Suter, false and deliberately misleading records have been produced by the Supreme Court of the United States.

Records received by William M. Windsor from the office of Supreme Court Clerk William K. Suter have led to the posting of an opinion of fraud by the office of Clerk Suter of the U.S. Supreme Court….¬†

Los Angeles, February 10 –¬† Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), has recently filed a request with the U.S. Congress for impeachment of Clerk Suter of the U.S. Supreme Court, for Deprivation of Rights: ¬†

  • Denying petitioners and applicants the Due Process right of notice and service of orders of the Court, and
  • Denying the People access to the judicial records of the court. [[i]]

Human Rights Alert further noted, that the U.S. Supreme Court, where valid judicial records in numerous cases are nowhere to be found, today fails to meet fundamental standards of an honest tribunal. [[ii]]

Now, additional records, received by petitioner William M. Windsor from the office of Clerk Suter, led to the posting of opinion of fraud by the office of Clerk Suter of the U.S. Supreme Court. [[iii]]

Windsor has been trying for sometime to discover, whether petitions and applications, which he filed with the U.S. Supreme Court in effort to protect his rights, were at all reviewed by the Court:

  • The online dockets of the Supreme Court of the United States note denial of Windsor’s petition and application on January 18, 2011.¬† However, Windsor has not been duly served by Clerk Suter with the order of denial.
  • Consequently, Windsor has unsuccessfully attempted to discover valid judicial records of the presumed January 18, 2011, review and denial of his petition and application. [[iv]]
  • On January 18-21, 2011, Mr George McDermott of Maryland, unrelated to the case, attempted to access the paper and electronic files and judicial records of the U.S. Supreme Court, pertaining to Mr Windsor and others.¬† The office of Clerk Suter denied access to the records. [[v]]
  • Later, as further effort to discover whether his case was at all reviewed by the Supreme Court, Windsor filed a Motion for an Order by the Court on Clerk William S. Suter for Service of Valid Evidence of Denial.¬† On February 8, 2011, the Motion was stamped “Received” by the office of the Clerk of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Now, Windsor received a response from the office of Clerk Suter on his February 8, 2011 Motion:

  • A February 8, 2011 letter was issued on behalf of Clerk William Suter, signed by Ms Cynthia Rapp, with no notation of her authority.
  • The enclosure to the February 8, 2011 Ms Rapp letter includes a copy of a record, which is an unsigned January 18, 2011 Order, denying Windsor’s Petition (10-690). Unsigned judicial records are invalid ones.
  • The copy of the unsigned January 18, 2011 unsigned Order was further stamped “True Copy,” but the signature on the “True Copy” stamp was an invalid signature as well.

Based on such records, Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert, has issued a statement:

In the February 8, 2011 letter, invalid records are provided to William M. Windsor on behalf of Clerk William Suter of the US Supreme Court. Moreover, the February 8, 2010 letter, signed by Ms Cynthia Rapp, demonstrates ongoing efforts to mislead Mr Windsor that he has been served with valid records pertaining to the denial of his petition and application (10-690 and 10-A690) by the Supreme Court of the United States.

In addition, Dr. Zernik, PhD, has opined that conduct of the office of Clerk William Suter in this case amounts to Fraud.

Dr. Zernik has accumulated substantial experience in examining records of the U.S. and state courts, of U.S. prisons, as well as U.S. banking records.¬† His opinions regarding such records were often supported by leading experts in related fields. [[vi]]¬† His reviews regarding computerized court and prison records in the United States were published in international, peer-reviewed computer science journal. [[vii], [viii]]¬† Report authored by Dr. Zernik on behalf of Human Rights Alert (NGO), was incorporated into official United Nations report with reference to “Corruption of the courts and the legal profession” in California. [[ix]]

LINKS

[i] 11-01-25 Request for Impeachment of US Supreme Court Clerk William Suter
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47539382/
[ii] 11-02-08 Where Are the Missing Records of the Supreme Court of the United States?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48414184/
[iii] 11-02-10 Windsor v Maid of the Mist Corporation (10-690 and 10-A690) – Fraud opined in U.S. Supreme Court records, received by Mr Windsor from office of Clerk Suter
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48596120/
[iv] 11-01-28 Press Release: Windsor v Maid of the Mist (10-A690) in the U.S. Supreme Court – Alleged “Shell Game Fraud”

http://www.scribd.com/doc/47778291/
[v] 11-01-22 Declaration of George McDermott in re: Attempt to Access U.S. Supreme Court Paper and Electronic Records to Inspect and to Copy
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47455844/
[vi] 11-01-06 Joseph Zernik, PhD, Biographical Sketch
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/
[vii] 10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining as a Civic Duty “Online Public Prisoners” Registration Systems, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining 1: 84-96 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328591/
[viii] 10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked U.S. Federal Courts, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining, 1:69-83 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328585/
[ix] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the  United Nations Human Rights Council  for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/

Obstruction of Justice at The Supreme Court

people-man-3500000-070113s0297-cropped-300w

√ā¬†

The Clerk’s Office of The United States Supreme Court is committing obstruction of justice and violating Constitutional and legal rights.

 I have written to the Clerk of the Court, William K. Suter, to request an appointment. 

I have called asking to speak to him, but they refuse to put my calls through to him or his assistant or anyone else.

I am now collecting evidence of illegal practices of the Clerk’s Office and the United States Supreme Court….

Continue reading Obstruction of Justice at The Supreme Court

Professional Misconduct Complaint Against Carl Hugo Anderson of Hawkins Parnell Thackston Young

Attorney Carl Hugo Anderson charged with Professional Misconduct

Carl Hugo Anderson is an attorney with Hawkins, Parnell, and Young in Atlanta, Georgia. 

I have filed a lawsuit against Carl Anderson and his firm, Hawkins, Parnell, and Young. 

I have also filed a Complaint of Professional Misconduct against Carl H. Anderson.

Continue reading Professional Misconduct Complaint Against Carl Hugo Anderson of Hawkins Parnell Thackston Young