 |
Were the petition and application of William M. Windsor reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court?
There is no way to tell!!! No valid judicial records have been discovered so far and in the most recent response from the office of Clerk Suter, false and deliberately misleading records have been produced by the Supreme Court of the United States.
Records received by William M. Windsor from the office of Supreme Court Clerk William K. Suter have led to the posting of an opinion of fraud by the office of Clerk Suter of the U.S. Supreme Court….
Los Angeles, February 10 – Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), has recently filed a request with the U.S. Congress for impeachment of Clerk Suter of the U.S. Supreme Court, for Deprivation of Rights:
- Denying petitioners and applicants the Due Process right of notice and service of orders of the Court, and
- Denying the People access to the judicial records of the court. [[i]]
Human Rights Alert further noted, that the U.S. Supreme Court, where valid judicial records in numerous cases are nowhere to be found, today fails to meet fundamental standards of an honest tribunal. [[ii]]
Now, additional records, received by petitioner William M. Windsor from the office of Clerk Suter, led to the posting of opinion of fraud by the office of Clerk Suter of the U.S. Supreme Court. [[iii]]
Windsor has been trying for sometime to discover, whether petitions and applications, which he filed with the U.S. Supreme Court in effort to protect his rights, were at all reviewed by the Court:
- The online dockets of the Supreme Court of the United States note denial of Windsor’s petition and application on January 18, 2011. However, Windsor has not been duly served by Clerk Suter with the order of denial.
- Consequently, Windsor has unsuccessfully attempted to discover valid judicial records of the presumed January 18, 2011, review and denial of his petition and application. [[iv]]
- On January 18-21, 2011, Mr George McDermott of Maryland, unrelated to the case, attempted to access the paper and electronic files and judicial records of the U.S. Supreme Court, pertaining to Mr Windsor and others. The office of Clerk Suter denied access to the records. [[v]]
- Later, as further effort to discover whether his case was at all reviewed by the Supreme Court, Windsor filed a Motion for an Order by the Court on Clerk William S. Suter for Service of Valid Evidence of Denial. On February 8, 2011, the Motion was stamped “Received” by the office of the Clerk of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Now, Windsor received a response from the office of Clerk Suter on his February 8, 2011 Motion:
- A February 8, 2011 letter was issued on behalf of Clerk William Suter, signed by Ms Cynthia Rapp, with no notation of her authority.
- The enclosure to the February 8, 2011 Ms Rapp letter includes a copy of a record, which is an unsigned January 18, 2011 Order, denying Windsor’s Petition (10-690). Unsigned judicial records are invalid ones.
- The copy of the unsigned January 18, 2011 unsigned Order was further stamped “True Copy,” but the signature on the “True Copy” stamp was an invalid signature as well.
Based on such records, Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert, has issued a statement:
In the February 8, 2011 letter, invalid records are provided to William M. Windsor on behalf of Clerk William Suter of the US Supreme Court. Moreover, the February 8, 2010 letter, signed by Ms Cynthia Rapp, demonstrates ongoing efforts to mislead Mr Windsor that he has been served with valid records pertaining to the denial of his petition and application (10-690 and 10-A690) by the Supreme Court of the United States.
In addition, Dr. Zernik, PhD, has opined that conduct of the office of Clerk William Suter in this case amounts to Fraud.
Dr. Zernik has accumulated substantial experience in examining records of the U.S. and state courts, of U.S. prisons, as well as U.S. banking records. His opinions regarding such records were often supported by leading experts in related fields. [[vi]] His reviews regarding computerized court and prison records in the United States were published in international, peer-reviewed computer science journal. [[vii], [viii]] Report authored by Dr. Zernik on behalf of Human Rights Alert (NGO), was incorporated into official United Nations report with reference to “Corruption of the courts and the legal profession” in California. [[ix]]
LINKS
[i] 11-01-25 Request for Impeachment of US Supreme Court Clerk William Suter
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47539382/
[ii] 11-02-08 Where Are the Missing Records of the Supreme Court of the United States?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48414184/
[iii] 11-02-10 Windsor v Maid of the Mist Corporation (10-690 and 10-A690) – Fraud opined in U.S. Supreme Court records, received by Mr Windsor from office of Clerk Suter
http://www.scribd.com/doc/48596120/
[iv] 11-01-28 Press Release: Windsor v Maid of the Mist (10-A690) in the U.S. Supreme Court – Alleged “Shell Game Fraud”
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47778291/
[v] 11-01-22 Declaration of George McDermott in re: Attempt to Access U.S. Supreme Court Paper and Electronic Records to Inspect and to Copy
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47455844/
[vi] 11-01-06 Joseph Zernik, PhD, Biographical Sketch
http://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/
[vii] 10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining as a Civic Duty “Online Public Prisoners” Registration Systems, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining 1: 84-96 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328591/
[viii] 10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked U.S. Federal Courts, International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining, 1:69-83 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328585/
[ix] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
