Supreme Court Landmark Decision means Constitution is Void


The United States Supreme Court issued a landmark decision on the validity of the Constitution of the United States on January 18, 2011.

I have been ill since mid-December, and I had my fourth eye surgery on Monday.  I am sorry that I have not updated the site for a month or so.  As soon as I can see again, I will write a daily blog.

This news has gotten a lot of coverage online.  It is amazing to me the people who don’t have a clue what they are talking about who say this is bogus and a hoax. 

Heaven help us!

The most important facts for everyone to know at this point are that our federal court system is corrupt from the bottom to the top.  I will exclude Sonia Sotomayor from the list for the moment, because I have reason to suspect that she would have done the right thing, but six justices is all it takes, and she was outvoted.

I will be on many radio shows in the next few weeks.  I’ll post the stations that I will be on when they give me all the information.

The Supreme Court considered three petitions filed by me.  These were original actions, not appeals.  This is very important because people whyo don’t know about the law think the only thing the Supreme Court does is rule on whether they choose to hear an appeal or not.  This is not the case here.  SCOTUS heard the case (to be precise, they heard not one, but THREE cases), none of which were contested by the judges I filed the petitions against, and SCOTUS ruled against me.   

The Questions Presented to The Supreme Court were:

1.   Will The Supreme Court declare that the Constitution and its amendments may be voided by the federal judges in Atlanta, Georgia?

2.   Should federal judges be stopped from committing illegal and corrupt acts to obstruct justice and inflict bias on litigants?  

3.   Will The Supreme Court be afraid to disclose the corruption in the federal courts?

The effect of the ruling is that there is now a precedent that the Supreme Court says it is okay for federal judges to ignore the Constitution and its amendments.  They can be as corrupt as they want, and the Supreme Court will not disclose it to the people.

I now have MASSIVE PROOF of judicial corruption.  My charges have been totally ignored by the United States Attorney’s Office, the FBI, and Congress.  I said to The Supreme Court that the issues I have presented take up a lot of paper, but it can all be boiled down to one question:

“Is The United States Supreme Court prepared to stop federal judges from functioning like common criminals?  If they care about decency, honesty, the law, the Constitution, and due process, they will act to stop it.  If they aren’t prepared to expose the corruption, they will deny the Application.”

They gave us an answer all right; they denied the petitions.

The citizens of the United States need to know that there is not a shred of decency, honesty, or Constitutional rights in our federal courts.  Corruption has consumed the federal court system, and we now live in a police state.  Judges are free to do absolutely anything they want.  Our laws are meaningless.  Your life savings can be stolen by a federal judge, and they have no risk in violating every law in the books.

My lawsuit doesn’t matter anymore.  This isn’t about me.  This is about the most serious issue to face this country in my 62 years.  Our country has been stolen from us, not by communists or terrorists, but by our own federal government.  We the people must get together and do something about this!

There are many, many stories of unbelievable judicial corruption that I am hearing from people all over the country.  There will be a meeting of those of us who care in the next few weeks.  We were going to meet in Atlanta, but we now may move it to Washington, DC, and we will try to have an event that will get media coverage.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus to Disqualify Judge William S. Duffey, Jr.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus to Disqualify Judges of the Eleventh Circuit

Petition for Writ of Mandamus to Disqualify Judge Orinda D. Evans

The United States Supreme Court’s Response to the Request to Require Judges to Honor the Constitution — Three So-Called Orders


Leave a Reply