Supreme Court to issue Landmark Decision on the Constitution

district-of-columbia-washington-supreme-court-cameras-3500000-061031i0036-300wThe United States Supreme Court will soon issue a landmark decision on the validity of the Constitution of the United States.

The Supreme Court will consider three petitions filed by William M. Windsor, a retired Atlanta, Georgia grandfather. 

“The Questions Presented to The Supreme Court are:

1.   Will The Supreme Court declare that the Constitution and its amendments may be voided by the federal judges in Atlanta, Georgia?

2.   Should federal judges be stopped from committing illegal and corrupt acts to obstruct justice and inflict bias on litigants?  

3.   Will The Supreme Court be afraid to disclose the corruption in the federal courts?

Windsor has been involved in a legal action in the federal courts in Atlanta since 2006.  Windsor was named as a defendant in a lawsuit in which the President of the Plaintiffs, Christopher Glynn of Maid of the Mist in Niagara Falls, swore under oath that Windsor did a variety of things including the crimes of theft and bribery.  Windsor stated under oath that Christopher Glynn made it all up and lied about absolutely everything that he said.  Windsor then obtained deposition testimony from Christopher Glynn and the other managers of the Maid of the Mist boat ride in Niagara Falls, Timothy P. Ruddy, and Robert J. Schul.  Glynn, Ruddy, and Schul admitted, under oath, that the charges against grandfather Windsor were not true.

Despite this undeniable proof, federal Judge Orinda D. Evans declared that Grandfather Windsor should not have fought the lawsuit, and she forced him to pay over $400,000 in the legal fees of the admitted liars of Maid of the Mist.  Grandfather Windsor appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, and federal judges Joel F. Dubina, Frank M. Hull, and Peter T. Fay rubber-stamped Judge Orinda D. Evans’ ruling.  Grandfather Windsor then took his appeal to The United States Supreme Court where The Supreme Court said the appeal was not worthy of their consideration.

William M. Windsor filed a lawsuit against Judge Orina D. Evans and others in Atlanta federal court to have the actions of the courts set aside due to fraud upon the courts.  In an assortment of orders and appeals, Windsor charges that the federal courts and nine federal judges violated the Constitution, the Due Process Clause, and the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.

Grandfather Windsor has discovered that, at least in Atlanta, Georgia, the federal courts operate like a police state in which the judges are all-powerful, committing criminal acts from their benches high above the courtooms and violating the Constitutional rights of tens of thousands of parties who have the misfortune of appearing in their courts.  The dishonesty and corruption seems to be especially bad with those who represent themselves in court, a percentage estimated at over 35%.

After finding nothing but corruption at the federal district courts and the court of appeals, the grandfather of three has tossed the hot potato right square in the laps of the justices of The United States Supreme Court.  By filing Petitions for Writs of Mandamus rather than an appeal, The Supreme Court is forced to deal with the issue.  And the fundamental issue is whether the corruption extends all the way to the top.  Is The United States Supreme Court corrupt, too?

Grandfather Windsor hopes for the best but fears for the worst: “I hope The Supreme Court is decent, honest, and cares about the Constitution and the citizens of the United States.  However, I am sorry to say that at this point, I suspect the corruption goes all the way to the top.  My charges have been totally ignored by the United States Attorney’s Office, the FBI, and Congress.  I have said to The Supreme Court that the issues I have presented take up a lot of paper, but it can all be boiled down to one question:

‘Is The United States Supreme Court prepared to stop federal judges from functioning like common criminals?  If they care about decency, honesty, the law, the Constitution, and due process, they will act to stop it.  If they aren’t prepared to expose the corruption, they will deny the Application.'”

Windsor says: “If The Supreme Court fails to act against these federal judges, the citizens of the United States need to know that there is not a shred of deceny, honesty, or Constitutional rights in our federal courts.  Corruption has consumed the federal court system, and we now live in a police state.  Judges are free to do absolutely anything they want.  Our laws are meaningless.  Your life savings can be stolen by a federal judge, and they have no risk in violating every law in the books.”

The Supreme Court should render its decision before the end of the year.  It’s one retired grandpa against the United States government.  May the best MAN win!


Petition for Writ of Mandamus to Disqualify Judge William S. Duffey, Jr.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus to Disqualify Judges of the Eleventh Circuit

Petition for Writ of Mandamus to Disqualify Judge Orinda D. Evans

News Coverage:








Leave a Reply