Views
The views of William M. Windsor.
 |
Mirko Vojnovic began a hunger strike on April 9, 2012 in front of the Santa Clara California Family Court.
Mirko Vojnovic is a victim of corruption by attorneys, judges, legal institutions, and their cronies.
Mirko Vojnoivic is providing a daily diary to Lawless America. This is his report from Day 2….
|
Mirko Vojnovic began a hunger strike on April 9, 2012 in front of the Santa Clara California Family Court.
Mirko Vojnovic is a victim of corruption by attorneys, judges, legal institutions, and their cronies.
Mirko Vojnoivic is providing a daily diary to Lawless America. This is his report from Day 3….
|
Mirko Vojnovic began a hunger strike on April 9, 2012 in front of the Santa Clara California Family Court.
Mirko Vojnovic is a victim of corruption by attorneys, judges, legal institutions, and their cronies.
Mirko Vojnoivic is one of the victims who will be featured in LawlessAmerica…The Movie.
 |
Chief Magistrate Leo T. Sorokin is the headliner for an event regarding “Criminal and Civil Practice Before Federal Magistrate Judges.”
Corruption victim Laura J., McGarry asks these questions:
What will be the highlights of his lecture? Will Chief Magistrate Leo T. Sorokin speak to how the Magistrate can promote criminal contempt by “Elite†attorneys with no consequence? Will he speak to the fact that, if needed, the Magistrate can always involve other corrupt public servants from within the federal judiciary to help strip disabled Americans of their civil and constitutional rights; he should include how he managed to pull this off and still get promoted
 |
Longtime New Jersey cannabis activist Ed Forchion, aka NJWeedman, announced recently that he’s hitting the road for the filming of “Roadamentary,” a documentary accounting his journey, driving across the states, from California back to New Jersey, in his infamous Weedmobil.
He will be relying on donations from potheads and weed sympathizers to fuel the journey.
The NJWeedman seeks to promote jury nullification. I bet he will get some interesting video! I wonder how many times he’ll get stopped by flashing lights in his attention-getting vehicle….
 |
It is important for those involved in court to understand what fraud upon the court is so you can realize when it is happening to you.
Fraud upon the court is important because orders and judgments may be set aside at any time when fraud upon the court is proven. I have seen cases where as many as 60 years later, a judgment was set aside.
The good news is that the rules and case law provide a way to get relief from wrongdoing. The bad news is that it requires a judge to make a finding of fraud, and my experience is that the judges are all guilty, but their fellow judges will cover for them.
Continue reading Attorneys, Judges, and Clerks of the Court all commit Fraud Upon the Court
 |
Federal Judge A. Richard Caputo, hearing arguments in the wake of the kids-for-cash scandal, has allowed 45 new plaintiffs to enter the suit.
U.S. District Court Judge A. Richard Caputo of the Middle District of Pennsylvania reversed the order he issued last month, which had dismissed two Section 1983 claims that were similar to the 43 others filed together.
Judge A. Richard Caputo ruled the claims weren’t barred by the statute of limitations because of the Supreme Court’s holding in American Pipe and Construction Co. v. Utah.
Continue reading Judge A. Richard Caputo Allows Additional Defendants in Kids-for-Cash Civil Suit
Judges have a Code of Judicial Conduct. Unfortunately, my experience is that judges do not comply with the Code of Judicial Conduct.
It is important to understand what judges are SUPPOSED to do so you will know when judges are violating the Code of Judicial Conduct.
The good news is that there is a Code of Judicial Conduct that provides important protections for parties. The bad news is that judges are not accountable, and the policing of judges is done by their fellow judges. My experience is that judges cover for each other so the Code of Judicial Conduct is not enforced….
This article discusses How Judges Violate the Code of Judicial Conduct and Commit Crimes against Parties. It is important to you because you need to constantly be aware of when judges are violating their rules, the rules of civil procedure, or various criminal statutes. I am not an attorney, and this is not legal advice; this reports my experience and observations.
I always file judicial misconduct complaints because I personally want to take every opportunity that I can to battle corruption. When the complaints are ignored, I have more proof of wrongdoing by judges. I also utilize the violations that I identify in motions for recusal.
I am using the federal Code of Judicial Conduct for this article. Your state’s Code of Judicial Conduct may vary. Be sure to compare this to your state’s Code of Judicial Conduct. These rules need to be made state law, and the policing should be done by special grand juries. I am listing only the rules that I find judges are most likely to break.
Judges do not uphold the integrity of the judiciary when they violate the Code of Judicial Conduct, the Rules of Civil Procedure, and criminal statutes. These are all violations of Canon 1.
When judges violate the Code of Judicial Conduct, the Rules of Civil Procedure, and criminal statutes, this demonstrates impropriety and the appearance of impropriety. These are all violations of Canon 2. When judges make rulings that make no sense based upon the facts or the law, I believe this shows the appearance of impropriety.
Whenever a judge does not comply with the law, it is a violation of Canon 2A. From my experience, judges very often do not comply with the law.
Canon 3 B.(2) — Judges should be faithful to the law.
When a judge does not comply with the law, it is a violation of Canon 3 B. (2).
Canon 3 B.(5) — Judges shall perform judicial duties without bias or prejudice.
When a judge demonstrates bias or prejudice, it is a violation of Canon 3 B. (5). Judges should recuse themselves when they have a bias or a prejudice, but they don’t. This Canon is violated often. My experience is that most judges have a bias against pro se parties and a prejudice in favor of fellow members of the Bar.
Judges violate this Canon when parties are denied the right to have hearings, testify under oath, examine witnesses, and cross-examine witnesses. My experience is that judges have routinely denied my most fundamental rights under the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Ex parte communications are when a party or an attorney communicates with a judge outside the presence of the opposing party or opposing counsel. You will not know when this happens in most cases. I discovered significant ex parte communication in my original case when the opposing counsel sought legal fees and had to produce their billing records. Those records showed conversations with the judge that neither I nor my attorney knew anything about.
Canon 3 B.(8) — Judges shall dispose of all judicial matters fairly, promptly, and efficiently.
Judges often dispose of matters unfairly. They do so when they ignore the facts, ignore and violate the law, ignore and violate the rules, and commit criminal acts.
In my original case, the judge ignored everything in the case for 217 days. Many motions were filed by each side, and Judge Orinda D. Evans ignored them all. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals had the audacity to claim that 217 days was not a failure to dispose of matters promptly.
Canon 3 D. (1) — Judges who receive information indicating a substantial likelihood that another judge has committed a violation of this Code should take appropriate action.
Judges ignore and violate this Canon. I have written to every federal appellate court judge in the country and each justice on the U.S. Supreme Court to inform them of violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct and criminal violations by federal judges in Georgia, and not one of those judges did a thing. Judges routinely cover up the wrongful actions of their fellow judges, which is yet another violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct. I notified every judge in Fulton County Georgia of violations and criminal acts by several Fulton County Superior Court judges, and no one did a thing. In addition to being violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct, the failure to report felonies to law enforcement is a criminal violation of 18 U.S.C. 4.
Canon 3 D. (2)
Just as judges ignore the wrongdoing of fellow judges, they ignore the violations of attorneys. I have repeatedly filed motions for sanctions in regard to such violations by attorneys, and every single one of them has been ignored. This is a violation of this Canon.
Canon 3 E. (1) — Judges shall disqualify themselves in any proceeding in which their impartiality might reasonably be questioned.
Judges refuse to recuse themselves when their impartiality would be questioned by reasonable people. Judges have made recusal a joke. While judges do not recuse (disqualify) themselves when it is appropriate, this refusal still constitutes a violation of Canon 3 E. (1) of the Code of Judicial Conduct.
Every federal judge who I have had the misfortune of dealing with has committed crimes. I have also been the victim of crimes by several judges in the Fulton County Superior Court.
Judges feel they can get away with anything because they are accountable to no one.
There are a number of things that you can do. I do them all because I have no fear, and I am determined to expose these corrupt judges. But realize that if you take any of these actions, there will be repercussions. I have observed that judges indicate bias against a party who takes any of these actions. So, act only if you are not afraid of the consequences to you. You will find that your attorney will not want to do any of these as they will not risk their careers for any client.
Recusal — I filed motions for recusal against every corrupt judge I encountered. I filed petitions for writ of mandamus to the court of appeals when the judges refused to recuse themselves. I even filed three petitions for writ of mandamus with the U.S. Supreme Court seeking to disqualify judges. I never won because the judges all cover up the wrongdoing of their fellow judges, but I did get more proof of violations of various types with each filing. My Motion for Recusal of Judge Jerry W. Baxter.
Judicial Complaints — I file complaints with the appropriate entity. On every complaint, the response was that there was no evidence, but there was always massive evidence. I did get more proof of wrongdoing with each filing. Judicial Misconduct Complaint against Federal Judge Thomas W. Thrash — Judicial Misconduct Complaint against Judge Orinda D. Evans — Second Judicial Misconduct Complaint against Judge Orinda D. Evans.
Corruption Reports — For example, I posted a Corruption Report of Judge Orinda D. Evans on www.LawlessAmerica.com. Our goal is to have this be the most comprehensive source of reports on bad judges and bad government officials of all types. This is a complete multimedia opportunity as you can post text, hyperlinks, photos, documents of any type, and URLs of websites with stories, etc.
Letters to Judges and Government Officials — I write everyone, sending proof of wrongdoing and criminal acts. While no one does anything, it provides more proof of wrongdoing and violations of 18 U.S.C. 4. I have written to every member of the U.S. House and Senate, the President, the U.S. Attorney General, every federal appellate court judge, the U.S. Attorney, the FBI, every member of the Georgia House and Senate, the Georgia Attorney General, the Fulton County Board of Commissioners, the Fulton County District Attorney, the Fulton County Sheriff, the Chief of the Atlanta Police department, and others.
Criminal Complaints — I have filed criminal complaints with the Fulton County Sheriff’s Department, the Atlanta Police Department, the Fulton County District Attorney, the U.S. Attorney, the FBI, the Attorney General, the Fulton County Grand Jury, and the Federal Grand Jury in Atlanta. All of these complaints were ignored except by the Fulton County Grand Jury. I was invited to present my charges, which I did. I was instructed by the Grand Jury to return four days later with my evidence footnoted to a document listing the charges. When I returned to continue my testimony, I was intercepted in the public elevator lobby by the Chief Investigator for the Fulton County District Attorney, Cynthia Nwokocha, and three Fulton County Sheriff’s Deputies. Criminal Complaint – Judge Orinda D. Evans — Criminal Complaint — Judge William S. Duffey — Criminal Complaint — Judge William S. Duffey (#2) — Criminal Complaint — Judge William S. Duffey (#3) — Criminal Complaint — Judge Joel F. Dubina and all judges of the Eleventh Circuit — Criminal Complaint — Judge Thomas W. Thrash (#1) — Criminal Complaint — Judge Thomas W. Thrash (#2) — Criminal Complaint — Bogus Action — Criminal Complaint — RICO.
Petition at the Courthouse — I have positioned myself outside the courthouse with signs and petition forms. I educate people as to the corruption, and I meet many other victims. When I take a video camera on a tripod, I get far more people. If you can mobilize to do this at least one day a week (preferably Tuesdays), this will accomplish a lot. We can use such a platform to work to try to stop the re-election of the corrupt judges. Atlanta Petitioning. Crowd at Fulton County Courthouse in Atlanta Georgia during Petitioning to Stop Corrupt Courts
Movie — You can testify before Congress and be in Lawless America…The Movie. This will send your message to the masses, including every member of Congress at the national and state level.
I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney. This website expresses my OPINIONS. The comments of visitors or guest authors to the website are their opinions and do not therefore reflect my opinions. Anyone mentioned by name in any article is welcome to file a response. This website does not provide legal advice. I do not give legal advice. I do not practice law. This website is to expose government corruption, law enforcement corruption, political corruption, and judicial corruption. Whatever this website says about the law is presented in the context of how I or others perceive the applicability of the law to a set of circumstances if I (or some other author) was in the circumstances under the conditions discussed. Despite my concerns about lawyers in general, I suggest that anyone with legal questions consult an attorney for an answer, particularly after reading anything on this website. The law is a gray area at best. Please read our Legal Notice and Terms.
{jcomments on}
|
A Lackawanna County Pennsylvania man has sued the county’s guardian ad litem in federal court, along with the Lackawanna County Common Pleas Court, alleging the family court’s guardian ad litem program deprived litigants of constitutional rights and that the court’s sole guardian “thoroughly misunderstood and misapplied her role.â€
In a complaint filed March 15, 2012 in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Dr. Michael Stefanov claimed attorney Danielle M. Ross threatened parents with sanctions if her recommendations were not followed while the court abdicated its judicial duties to Danielle M. Ross and “rubberstamped†her recommendations into court orders.
 |
The tales are sadly familiar to even the most casual observer of state politics.
Ethics violations galore.
A State Integrity Investigation revealed many violations, but this is just the tip of the iceberg because the study appears to only brush the surface….
