William M. Windsor’s Grand Jury Presentation #2


William M. Windsor will appear before the Fulton County Grand Jury and Foreman Steve Broadbent (shown here) again on Tuesday, August 23, 2011. 

The Grand Jurors requested simple statements of the issues followed by the proof.

Here is the start of what I will present.  I will add the specifics as time permits….

Judges Orinda D. Evans, William S. Duffey, and Thomas W. Thrash, persons operating in Fulton County Georgia as judges in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, James N. Hatten, the Clerk of the Court, and others have conspired to obstruct justice and deny my due process rights under the Constitution of Georgia and the United States by intentionally and knowingly committing crimes. I am presenting to the Grand Jury focused statements of the crimes committed and the proof of each.

As requested, I am not providing a narrative herein of how this happened – just the most relevant of the facts.

I am charging violations of Georgia state laws: Perjury – O.C.G.A. § 16-10-70; False Swearing – Making False Statements – O.C.G.A. § 16-10-71 and O.C.G.A. 16-10-20; Subornation of Perjury – O.C.G.A. § 16-10-72; Influencing Witnesses – O.C.G.A. § 16-10-93; Tampering with Evidence – O.C.G.A. § 16-10-94; Conspiracy – O.C.G.A. § 16-4-8; Violation of Oath of Office – O.C.G.A. § 16-10-1; and Aiding and Abetting – O.C.G.A. § 16-2-20 and O.C.G.A. § 16-2-21.

I am charging violations of federal laws: False Swearing – Making False Statements – 18 U.S.C. § 1001; Perjury – 18 U.S.C. § 1621; Subornation of Perjury – 18 U.S.C. § 1622; Obstruction of Justice — 18 U.S.C. § 1503; Conspiracy — 18 U.S.C. § 371; Misprision of Felonies – 18 U.S.C. § 4; and Aiding and Abetting — 18 U.S.C. § 2.

Many of the said violations also constitute predicate act crimes and prove violation of the RICO statute of the State of Georgia, O.C.G.A. § 16-14-1 et seq.

Each of these statutes is provided in Exhibit A. You need to have a basic understanding of the laws involved so you will understand how each fact presented violates the law.

Perjury is making a statement under oath that you know to be false.

Tampering with Evidence is when a person obstructs the prosecution or defense of any person by knowingly destroying, altering, concealing, or disguising physical evidence or making, devising, preparing, or planting false evidence.

False Swearing – Making False Statements is knowingly and willfully – (1) falsifying, concealing, or covering up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; (2) making any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or (3) making or using any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry.

Subornation of Perjury or False Swearing is when a person procures or induces another to commit the offense of perjury or the offense of false swearing.

Obstruction of Justice is deemed to be any conduct that interferes with the judicial process.

Obstruction of Justice with Witnesses is when any person knowingly engages in misleading conduct toward another person with intent to influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person….”

Conspiracy is when two or more persons conspire to commit any criminal offense.

Violation of Oath of Office is when any public official willfully and intentionally violates the terms of his or her oath as prescribed by law.

RICO is a pattern of committing criminal acts. RICO requires proof of at least two of the just identified crimes. RICO requires showing an ongoing pattern of racketeering activity, which is to commit, to attempt to commit, or to solicit, coerce, or intimidate another person to commit any crime. The acts of racketeering activity committed by the Defendants have the same or similar methods of commission in that they involve the various aspects of committing fraud in legal matters, including obstruction of justice, perjury, false statements in orders, improper claims of law and case law, and more. The “pattern of racketeering activity” consisted of many incidents of racketeering activity that have the same or similar intents, results, accomplices, victims, and methods of commission and are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics. This activity has continued for years, is ongoing at the present time, and will continue into the future with a threat of repetition unless halted by judicial intervention.

Everything that I am communicating to you is uncontroverted (not disputed by evidence).  There has never been a sworn affidavit, a sworn deposition, or courtroom testimony to dispute the facts that I am going to tell you.

I will now lost my specific charges and the proof.  I’ll add this when time permits.

William M. Windsor

{jcomments on}

Leave a Reply