Violation #2 – Judicial Misconduct of Judge Orinda D. Evans – Ex Parte Communications


The following information is taken from a sworn affidavit that I filed with the courts as part of complaints about the judicial misconduct of Judge Orinda D. Evans:

1.   I submit that it is possible that Judge Orinda D. Evans and/or a clerk for Judge Evans may have been improperly influenced in this case.  I believe it is possible that improper influence could be a criminal violation, though I have no proof.  This is only a suspicion of a possibility, and I have this suspicion because the behavior of Judge Orinda D. Evans in this matter makes no logical sense to me.

2. ¬† The Time Slips of Maid’s Attorneys¬†show that there was extensive ex parte communication¬†between Maid’s Attorneys and Judge Orinda D. Evans¬†and her staff.¬† While some of this may be permissible, the volume of ex parte contact certainly indicates that there were plenty of opportunities for Judge Orinda D. Evans to be improperly influenced.¬† There were conversations and communications between Judge Orinda D. Evans and Maid’s Attorneys that Judge Evans did not reveal to Alcatraz and me. (Exhibit¬†#1 to Dec #23 — Evans Docket #406.)¬† [Evans Docket #253-8, 253-15, 253-10.]¬† (Exhibit #967 to Dec #25.)¬† (I submit that this is a violation of Rule 3.4 and 8.4 of the GCPC¬†and Local Rule 83.1C.¬† I submit that this is a violation of Canon 3 of the Code of Conduct¬†for United States Judges.)

3.¬†¬† VIOLATIONS BY JUDGE ORINDA D. EVANS — I submit that this ex parte communication is a violation of Canon 3 of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges.¬† (Proof is provided in the paragraphs above, Evans Docket #253-8, 253-15, 253-10.)¬† (Dec #25, Exhibit #967.)¬†

I have filed a Judicial Misconduct Complaint against Judge Orinda D. Evans with the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.  I previously filed a Judicial Misconduct Complaint against Judge Orinda D. Evans that was ignored.  I also have a lawsuit pending against Judge Orinda D. Evans for Fraud Upon the Court (Civil Action No. 1:09-CV-02027-WSD in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.


Bill Windsor

I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney.  This website expresses my OPINIONS.   The comments of visitors or guest authors to the website are their opinions and do not, therefore, reflect my opinions.  Anyone mentioned by name in any article is welcome to file a response.   This website does not provide legal advice.  I do not give legal advice.  I do not practice law.   This website is to expose judicial corruption, government corruption, law enforcement corruption, attorney wrongdoing/corruption, and political corruption.   Whatever this website says about the law is presented in the context of how I or others perceive the applicability of the law to a set of circumstances if I (or some other author) was in the circumstances under the conditions discussed.  Despite my concerns about lawyers in general, I suggest that anyone with legal questions consult an attorney for an answer, particularly after reading anything on this website.  The law is a gray area at best.  Please read our  Legal Notice and Terms. 





Copyright, 2022, Lawless America



Leave a Reply