Texas Judge Charles Sandoval, Judge Weldon Copeland, Judge William Roberts, and Judge Nathan E. White charged with fraud, extortion, and more…destroying lives of a woman and her child.
Denise Loughlin has been pitted against her wealthy ex-husband doctor.
This is the shocking story of Denise Loughlin….
Nicholas R. Kuchmak, M.D. and his wife Denise Loughlinâ€™s natural daughter is Eveline Kuchmak. Nick and Denise met and married in their native Canada in 1982, immigrating to Texas in 1983. Denise did all back-end management in their joint business enterprises and his medical practices. Nick filed two divorces against Denise in the 380th State District Court, McKinney Texas in May then June 2001. Denise fled her marital home with her daughter with what personal effects each could carry, on attorney advice by police referral, to save their lives.
Dr. Kuchmak had total control and sole access to all U.S. and Canadian joint marital assets. He used his superior position as a medical doctor to hire a team of two Board certified attorneys to divorce Denise. Judge Charles Sandoval, 380th Court, refused to order Nick to pay interim attorney fees. Denise was unable to pay attorney fees for most of her divorce. She was unable to pay counsel to protect and retain her parental, personal and property rights during the dissolution of the nineteen year marriage.
Judge Charles Sandoval would not allow witnesses (police officers, clergy, doctors, teachers, friends, family members, neighbours and others) to testify for Denise, who was totally unable to defend her parental, personal and property rights, unable to have any part of her counter-petition of cruelty heard before the Court. Denise was unable to pay for professional accountants, compel discovery or access any U.S. and Canadian financial records for all Trusts, Family Limited Partnership, and all other jointly held marital business and personal interests, assets etc.
Judge Charles Sandoval forced Denise to jury trial two weeks after she had necessary surgery to repair a work related injury, against doctorâ€™s orders, while she was under the influence of prescription narcotics for pain relief. Sandoval forced Denise to conduct her own voir dire and refused to recuse prospective jurors who had been Dr. Kuchmakâ€™s patients.
Judge Charles Sandoval bifurcated the jury trial, against Deniseâ€™s objections because she had made a jury demand and paid for a jury trial on all merits of the divorce, property and custody etc. Judge Charles Sandoval told Denise he knew her husband was a good man, that he didnâ€™t deserve to â€œbe saddled with such an ungrateful wifeâ€ and that he alone would decide all property division because he â€œknew Dr. Kuchmak was a good manâ€.
In June 2002, any decision on child custody by a jury was binding and could not be modified at any time as could a Bench decision or any mutual out of Court settlement between divorcing parties.
Judge Charles Sandoval forced Denise to trial even after she said she was not ready. Denise had two attorneys show up at the last minute, under extreme duress, early morning on the second day of the trial. Neither was prepared or competent. Both advised Denise to settle out of Court to avoid Judge Charles Sandovalâ€™s threat that he would have her involuntarily committed to a psychiatric hospital by Collin County Statutory Probate Judge Weldon Copeland unless Denise agreed to all settlement terms demanded by her husband.
These attorneys told Denise to settle based on Nickâ€™s unsubstantiated statements that the entire joint marital Estate U.S. and Canada, after nineteen years, involving medical practice and other businesses which earned in excess of $2.2 million annually for years, had a total net worth of only $1.2 million. Denise had no choice to accept $600,000.00 and loss of primary custody of her daughter, Eveline, plus multiple other concessions to avoid being involuntarily committed to a psychiatric hospital by Judge Weldon Copeland, as Judge Charles Sandoval threatened.
Dr. Kuchmak voluntarily relinquished his parental rights and Court order custody of Eveline to Denise over the next fifteen months. He would issue threats and police actions to collect Eveline from Deniseâ€™s home each time he was angry with Denise or worried that he was losing control over her. Police would come and collect Eveline at all hours night and day from Sunday night to Friday afternoon, whenever Kuchmak wanted to punish Denise for whatever. He continually told Eveline that the only way he knew to prevent her from being as weird as her mother was to kill Denise. He kept telling Denise that he would destroy her legally, financially and physically. He told her after the divorce that he knew he had accomplished the first two, and would make she was dead as soon as he had a new mother for Eveline. He made sure that no one except Denise or Eveline ever heard him make these threats, ever. He told everyone that Denise was seriously mentally and emotionally ill. He did all he could to dismantle her personality and her by isolating her from family, friends and career. He was a very abusive, controlling husband and father, who never let anyone know how he was abusing Denise and Eveline, ever. Many people knew however and wanted to testify to support Denise, which Judge Charles Sandoval would not allow during the divorce.
Denise documented every event, every action, and kept meticulous records to cope with the horrific loss of her daughter. Denise underwent her nineteenth major surgery in September 2002, requiring eight month convalescence. Eveline purposely injured herself in March 2003, requiring hospitalization and lengthy convalescence with Denise so that she could live with her mom.
Dr. Kuchmak dated Department of Justice Dallas tax attorney Ramona Notinger from December 2002 to March 2003 when they broke up as he said â€œdue to irreconcilable differencesâ€.
Denise hired Dallas attorney Larry DePlaza in May 2003 to modify the child custody, ensuring her primary custody of Eveline by the Court, as she already had.
Dr. Kuchmak took Eveline for an extended holiday to Europe in June â€“July 2003. He asked Denise to reconcile with him in mid July 2003 which Denise declined. Denise told him to reconcile with Mona and wished him a happy life. The more that he became involved with Mona, and her two children, the less he bothered Denise and Eveline.
Nick and Mona became engaged in late July or early August with a planned wedding date afternoon December 27, 2003. Denise never met or interacted with Mona at any time until after Nickâ€™s death at her home in the early morning September 6, 2003. Mona went to his medical clinic, sent a mass distribution email notifying every one of his death, from his clinic computer, including Denise and Eveline.
All parties/entities material to the divorce fraud etc joined with Trustee Steve Storey and the NRK Trusts et al and Court appointed Successor Trustee Judge William Roberts and the NRK Estate et al to continue the cover up and fraud etc in the probate of Nickâ€™s Will and Trusts, U.S. and Canada, since 2003 to date.
Attorneys, accountants, and others with pre-existing professional relationships with Denise have been hired by and continue to work for the various Trusts/Estates et al suing Denise and her daughter, in spite of the unconscionable conflicts of interests.
Dan Kuchmak, the late Marilyn Aiello and her adult son, Louis Aiello, and DOJ attorney fiancee Mona Notinger arrived uninvited and unannounced around midday at Denise and Evelineâ€™s home September 9, 2003. These people, particularly Marilyn, became so violent and threatening, trying to get into the house and take Eveline away from Denise that neighbours and Denise (as advised per phone call by attorney Larry DePlaza) called Plano Police.
Police officers advised these people to leave the premises after Mona and Dan admitted possession of Evelineâ€™s U.S. passport and were not returning it to Denise as she asked on Evelineâ€™s behalf. Mona and Dan told police they were going to file custody litigation to get possession of Eveline in a civil court.
*Nick had asked the 380th State District Court to allow him to get a U.S. passport for Eveline. Both parents had agreed that she travel on Deniseâ€™s Canadian passport at all times due to security concerns against any anti-American sentiment during any of their extensive travels outside the U.S. Nick listed his mother, Helen Kuchmak as Evelineâ€™s sole living relative on Evelineâ€™s passport. If Helen Kuchmak had been successful in getting physical custody of Eveline as she and her children, their attorneys and others tried through April, 2004 or any time until Eveline got a new passport, Helen would have been able to take Eveline out of the U.S. because Helen Kuchmak had possession of Evelineâ€™s passport listing Helen as her lawful designated relative of record with the U.S. State Department. It is doubtful that Denise would have been able to pay the legal and other costs necessary to get lawful custody of Eveline again in any Canadian Court based on such bad acts and criminal violations by Nick, his mother, brother, sister and lawyers et al.
The paternal relatives, non-resident foreign born nationals including Canadians Nickâ€™s mom, Helen Kuchmak, his late sister Marilyn Aiello (Court appointed Independent Co-Administrator of the NRK Estate) and his brother, trustee Dan Kuchmak (whose Estate is contingent beneficiary named in Nickâ€™s Will if Eveline dies before age 40 without children) filed a malicious frivolous harassing custody suit against Denise, absent standing as parents per Texas law to physical care, custody and control of Eveline Kuchmak, Deniseâ€™s minor daughter. This case was filed and active before Nickâ€™s Will was admitted to Probate.
All parties/entities material to this custody litigation were adversarial to and suing Denise and her daughter as Defendants. This frivolous harassing litigation absolutely interfered in all ways U.S. and Canada, with Deniseâ€™s abilities to parent and act in all ways as fiduciary, Parent and Individual, as Court appointed Permanent Guardian of the Estate of Eveline Kuchmak, an Incapacitated Minor extended by express Court Order by Judge Weldon Copeland through May 27, 2008.
These people petitioned the 380th State District Court and Judge Charles Sandoval to take U.S. native citizen Eveline Kuchmak out of Texas, out of the U.S., beyond the protection and jurisdiction of her native U.S. Government and Country. This bogus litigation was filed absent affidavits to substantiate the lies, innuendo, hearsay and outright libel etc by all parties/entities against Denise. None had ever lived in Texas at any time.
None had seen Denise or Eveline at any time together since 1998, when Eveline was only eight years old.
They brought all records forward from behind the face of the divorce, into all probate matters as well, violating â€œres judicataâ€ to libel, defame, harm, impugn and inveigh Deniseâ€™s character, integrity, intent, parenting, reputation, employability, credit worthiness, and â€œpunishâ€ her for leaving her husband, Nick. These people hired Nickâ€™s Board Certified Family lawyers to sue Denise. They refused to surrender Evelineâ€™s passport to Denise as mandated by U.S. State Department to take Eveline home to Alberta for her daddyâ€™s funeral September 16, 2003. They finally non-suited their custody suit, declining all access to and visitation with Eveline at all time in perpetuity, U.S. and Canada to avoid paying Deniseâ€™s $55,000.00 plus legal fees and costs incurred defending her sole rights to her own daughter.
Board Certified Family lawyer, Judge William Roberts, Court appointed Attorney ad Litem for Eveline simultaneously Court appointed Temporary then Permanent Administrator for the NRK Estate, did not return Evelineâ€™s passport to Denise until after the relatives dropped their lawsuit. He paid himself as Evelineâ€™s Attorney ad Litem and Estate Administrator for what he did to join with the relatives, trustees and Court appointees to sue Denise for custody of Eveline while working to probate the Will, Trusts and Estate. Judge Copeland appointed the fiancee, Mona Notinger as Resident Agent for Marilyn Aiello, Court appointed Estate Administrator, even though she was represented by attorneys representing the Estate, and Judge William Roberts.
Eveline Kuchmak is the sole affirmed heir of her late father, Dr. Nicholas Kuchmakâ€™s Estate, initially valued in excess of $10 million plus, Canadian and U.S. assets still not disclosed and distributed due to Collin County Statutory Probate Court Number One Judge Weldon Copelandâ€™s March 17, 2004 ruling of no financial disclosure of all U.S. and Canada to Eveline Kuchmak and Denise Loughlin. These records include all Deniseâ€™s records, U.S. and Canada from 1981 to June 28, 2003.
The absolute deprivation of Denise Loughlin and Eveline Kuchmakâ€™s human and civil rights, liberty and property U.S. and Canada grossly abrogate Denise and Evelineâ€™s constitutional rights with absolutely no basis in law continue gross violations of Texas, US and Canadian Constitutions by Collin County Statutory Probate Judge Weldon Copeland, Steve Storey and the NRK Trusts et al and Court appointed Successor Trustee Judge William Roberts and the NRK Estate et al since 2003 to date.
Judge Weldon Copeland and the Court continue all matters with such lack of impartiality absent due process for clearly improper and unconstitutional purposes. The damages being inflicted upon Denise Loughlin, Eveline Kuchmak, her Estate et al and the NRK Trusts/Estate et al themselves by virtue of Judge Weldon Copelandâ€™s rampant public corruption and consequent far-reaching scope and influence in and beyond Texas, official misconduct, colour of law abuses, depriving Denise and Evelineâ€™s human and civil rights, liberty, property U.S. and Canada for the last eight plus years continue very real, harsh, irreparable and immediate.
Judge Weldon Copeland allows a bunch of his personal cronies, political supporters, dishonest attorneys, appointees, disgruntled relatives, their agents, family members and others who continue, literally, to conspire together to steal money U.S. and Canada, from Eveline Kuchmak, Denise Loughlin and the NRK Trusts/Estate et al. Not one of the several hundred lawyers interviewed will do anything to challenge Judge Weldon Copeland and his extensive corrupt network often called â€œRick Perryâ€™s coin operated Courts.â€ Previous counsel are unjustly enriched by cooperating with Copelandâ€™s bad acts instead of doing anything each one said could be done to defend Denise and Eveline when soliciting employment to represent each. Copeland identifies Judge William Roberts as the judge who got Judge Weldon Copeland his judge job in 1992.
Judge Weldon Copeland has and continues to throw Eveline and Denise â€œunder the busâ€ to continue his public corruption, official misconduct, racketeering, conspiracy to violate and violation of civil rights, theft of honest services, cronyism, abuse of office and appointment and all other such bad acts etc by which he effects the involuntary redistribution of NRK Trusts/Estate et al assets U.S. and Canada, under colour of law, to his preferred cronies and friends and others, in spite of all law.
It is frightening that Denise Loughlinâ€™s due diligent questioning of the racketeering, frauds, securities frauds, and all other bad acts etc material to excessive demands of Court appointees, attorneys, agents, assigns or desires to object to grossly excessive fees sought by an attorney, anyJudge Weldon Copeland crony, to ask for equal treatment under law, for full disclosure in all transparency mandated by law are absolutely ignored by Judge Weldon Copeland and the Court.
Judge Weldon Copeland has shown such criminal partiality for his cronies Judge William Roberts and his employer Gay McCall Isaacks et al Law Firm, Senior and visiting Judge Nathan E. White, Stephen K. Storey, Marilyn Aiello, Dan Kuchmak, Helen Kuchmak and all various other parties/entities material U.S. and Canada that the Court itself has not followed all law in result. The Court cannot do act lawfully or impartially due to the multiple gross repeat acts of fraud by various sworn Officers of the Court, including Judge Weldon Copeland, which perpetrate fraud upon the Court. Any such act of fraud by any sworn Officer of the Court is deemed a crime so seriously opposed to the administration and operation of justice that no statute of limitations can apply.
Judge Weldon Copeland, Judge William Roberts, and Judge Nathan E. White effect each of their Constitutional disqualifications by each oneâ€™s actions and admissions which perpetrate fraud upon the Court, Eveline Kuchmak, the Estate of Eveline Kuchmak, Denise Loughlin and the NRK Trusts/Estate et al in all matters U.S. and Canada at all time material to the NRK Trusts/Estate et al. Each has compelled his own â€œsua sponteâ€ recusal upon request but none have done as asked repeatedly under law and in equity by Denise Loughlin for her daughter, Eveline, her Estate et al and the NRK Trusts/Estate et al to date.
All right to make appellate record, exercise all appellate rights, ability to file for all affirmative relief, remedy and recourse at law and in equity, trial by jury, due process, equal treatment under law, impartial hearing before a judge are denied by Judge Weldon Copeland and his corrupt and criminal bad acts and admissions etc prohibit Denise and Eveline from hiring legal counsel to protect each oneâ€™s human and civil, personal and property rights. The actions taken against Eveline Kuchmak, Denise Loughlin and the Estate of Eveline Kuchmak, the NRK Trusts/Estate et al by Judge Weldon Copeland et al shock the conscience.
There has been a complete breakdown of due process in the probate and other courts Texas and Canada. Denise Loughlinâ€™s and Eveline Kuchmakâ€™s constitutional rights to due process, protection from unreasonable seizure, to hire legal counsel, to travel, to work, to engage in commerce and business transactions, etc., have been suspended. Deprivation of constitutional rights is irreparable injury as a matter of law. Denise Loughlin and Eveline Kuchmak are also suffering very real irreparable injuries
Denise Loughlin has been threatened and warned repeatedly by Judge Weldon Copeland, Judge Nathan E. White, and othersâ€” including warnings made in writingâ€”that she faces risk of involuntary psychiatric commitment, million dollar plus fines, contempt and going to jail if she dared attempt full free exercise of civil and human rights, U.S. and Canada or to hire independent attorneys outside of Copelandâ€™s extensive reach and influence of his corrupt circle of cronies to protect her and her daughterâ€™s personal, property, human and civil rights.
The deprivations to which both Denise and Eveline have been and continue subject to are grave and unconscionable. The Probate Court suspended Deniseâ€™s and Evelineâ€™ Texas, U.S. and Canadian Constitutional rights to due process, equal treatment under law, honest services, full disclosure in all transparency of all matters U.S and Canada for the purpose of denying Denise Loughlin and Eveline Kuchmak the ability to retain counsel mandated by Texas law. Such actions and admissions, threats, official misconduct, abuse of office and appointment, colour of law abuses, conspiracy to violate and actual violation of civil and human rights continue unlawful and violate the Texas, US and Canadian Constitutions.
In a side-step of the Texas, U.S. and Canadian Constitutions, Judge Weldon Copeland, Steve Storey and the NRK Trusts et al (including Judge Weldon Copeland cronies Court appointed Successor Trustees Judge Nathan White and Judge William Roberts) and Court appointed Successor Trustee Judge William Roberts and the NRK Estate et al are in the active process of administering star-chamber â€˜justiceâ€™, involuntary redistributing NRK Trusts/Estate et al assets U.S. and Canada between themselves and others, absent all due process.
When womenâ€™s identities are stolen under colour of law, human rights, civil rights, equal treatment under law, due process, liberty and property U.S. and Canada are stripped from them, a cascade of constitutional rights are impaired. It is the right to due process, honest services, equal treatment under colour of law, human rights, civil rights, liberty and property U.S. and Canada which are cornerstones of a democratic society. Eveline Kuchmak and Denise Loughlin are being deprived of the fundamental human and civil rights to due process, equal treatment under law, liberty and property U.S. and Canada, to manage and make fully informed decisions on all matters. Eveline and Denise cannot hire lawyers to defend their personal and property rights due to Judge Weldon Copelandâ€™s, Judge Nathan E. Whiteâ€™s, Judge William Roberts and Storeyâ€™s blatant public corruption and influence.
Denise and Evelineâ€™s health and medical condition are very real matters which have dramatically deteriorated under the stress of this eight year plus ordeal. Each is unable to sleep and is suffering from frequent panic attacks, and nausea. No party, entity and Judge Weldon Copeland have any legitimate interest in denying Eveline Kuchmak and Denise Loughlinâ€™s Texas, U.S. and Canadian Constitutional rights to legal counsel equal in every way to the attorneys representing Steve Storey and the NRK Trusts et al (including longtime Judge Weldon Copeland cronies Court appointed Successor Trustee Judge William Roberts and Senior Judge Nathan E. White Jr) and Court appointed Successor Trustee Judge William Roberts and the NRK Estate et al There is a compelling public interest in upholding the US Constitution
This Court seems intent on continuing a kangaroo court with Court appointed Successor Trustees Judge William Roberts and Judge Nathan E. White acting on behalf of this Court as prosecutors, defense counsel and judge. Accordingly Eveline Kuchmak and her Estate et al need access to her inheritance and money to hire experienced trial counsel to defend each of the ‘claims’ solicited by the prosecutor/defense counsel/judges paying each other and the lawyers representing them consuming NRK Trust/Estate et al assets to sue Eveline Kuchmak, a very young university undergraduate, a non-lawyer, forced to try to defend herself, her Estate et al and her Statutory Durable Attorney of Fact of record, her Parent and herself while Judge Weldon Copeland rules no financial disclosure all assets U.S. and Canada in all matters.
Other than brutally punishing Eveline and Denise Loughlinâ€” limiting Denise and Evelineâ€™s access to medical care, threatening and intimidating both, extorting both, preventing Denise from traveling outside of the U.S. since January 1, 2007, causing utilities to be terminated at her home, depriving both of all honest services, human rights, civil rights, liberty and property U.S. and Canada, etc.â€” literally, the entire probate and all consolidated Causes have achieved nothing other than to: (1) prevent Denise Loughlin and Eveline Kuchmak from hiring any legal counsel, (2) create a list of groundless, non-diverse state law attorney fee â€˜claimsâ€™ against Denise, Eveline, her Estate and the NRK Trusts/Estate et al; and (3) provide a platform for Steve Storey and the NRK Trusts (including Judge Weldon Copeland cronies Judge Nathan E. White and Judge William Roberts) and Court appointed Successor Trustee Judge William Roberts to run up fee demands to an alleged combined total of over TWO MILLION DOLLARS. Notably, every possible thread of an excuse has been used by Judge Weldon Copeland, Steve Storey and the NRK Trusts et al (including Court appointed Successor Trustees Judge Judge Nathan E. White and Judge William Roberts) and Court appointed Successor Trustee Judge William Roberts and the NRK Estate et al to churn the files to run up fees and cover up white collar crime, fraud, securities fraud, fraud upon the Court, and all other criminal and bad acts etc material, Texas, U.S. and Canada. When no excuses could be found, Steve Storey and the NRK Trusts et al (including Court appointed Successor Trustees Judge Nathan E. White and Judge William Roberts) and Court appointed Successor Trustee Judge William Roberts and the NRK Estate et al, their lawyers, agents, assigns, heirs et al have fabricated new ones.
Judge nathan E. White used Evelineâ€™s personally identifying information, without her knowledge, consent, or physical presence to open a LegacyTexas Bank account for her in January 2009. LegacyTexas Bank eventually closed this account per Deniseâ€™s written protests and instruction to close this account opened in violation of the U.S Patriot Act. Judge Nathan E. White extorts Eveline under duress, per his arbitrary condition not part of Trust instrument or law, to bank at his bank of record, LegacyTexas Bank where he has outstanding loans of record. Judge Nathan E. White has added his name to this account without notifying or asking Eveline which she opened as a sole signer account. LegacyTexas Bank staff report that Judge Nathan E. White and senior LegacyTexas administration direct that Eveline cannot access her banking records, receive monthly or other statements, see her signature card, or have anyone with her at any time she is any LegacyTexas Bank branch. This bank is under Written Agreement with U.S. Federal .Reserve Bank Dallas and the Texas Banking Dept. since August 2009 for bad banking practice and various other â€œirregularitiesâ€.
LegacyTexas Bank is represented by Abernathy Boyd et al Law Firm, McKinney TX, which was the first firm representing the NRK Estate. Judge William Roberts and Marilyn Aiello Court appointed Independent Co-Administrators for the NRK Estate fired this firm for legal malpractice, incompetence etc.
On January 3, 2012, Court appointed Successor Trustee Senior and Visiting Judge Nathan E. White Jr. notified Denise in writing that he has diverted mail for Denise and Eveline, for utilities, IRS and most other communications, without telling Denise or Eveline, without copying either. He joins with Plaintiffs Storey/Roberts et al to refuse sufficient Trust/Estate distributions for Evelineâ€™s necessities, telling all third parties/entities that Denise is personally responsible for all costs for maintenance, upkeep, repairs etc, utilities etc for the Trust owned property 6404 Widgeon Drive Plano TX.
Judge Nathan E. White, Storey, Judge William Roberts et al refused to pay utilities so all utilities at 6404 Widgeon Drive Plano were terminated from February to May 2010. Storey told the pool contractor that Denise was responsible for all pool maintenance costs from September 2009 to August 2010. The pool company sued Denise for payment without notifying her of this litigation. Judge Nathan E. White told Denise that he would sue her if she didnâ€™t agree to do business with the pool company who sued her for non-payment by the Trusts.
Judge Nathan E. White, Storey, Judge William Roberts et al have notified Denise and Eveline that Denise has to pay all utilities from January 2012 for as long as she lives there even though the Court has approved these amounts and ordered the Trusts/Estate to bear all costs material. Judge Nathan E. White has notified utility and other companies to collect payments from Denise. Judge Nathan E. White notified Denise and Eveline that the electricity will be shut off January 17, 2012, and all other utilities terminated if Denise canâ€™t pay the bills which she doesnâ€™t get because Judge Nathan E. White diverts the mail. Deniseâ€™s credit rating, employability, reputation, and ability to earn a living in result making it almost impossible for her to find work, although she does all she can to get a job, any job.
Judge Nathan E. White amplifies this extortion demanding that Eveline talk directly to him, without record, on matters he refuses to put in writing, to force Denise and Eveline to involuntarily waive all civil rights, liberty, property U.S. and Canada: to ensure that Judge Weldon Copeland, Judge William Roberts, Storey, Judge Nathan E. White and the rest will get away with this.
Denise and Eveline met with Judge Nathan E. White twice before where he arranged meetings to review highly privileged multi-million dollar U.S. and Canadian NRK Trusts/Estate in public within earshot of all passersby, first in a Dallas Starbucks August 2009, the second at a McKinney grocery store November 2009. Judge Nathan E. White brought disinterested third parties/entities, his lady friend employed by his Sigma Chi Fraternity to Starbucks. He told Denise he would have her arrested if she stayed for the meeting. Judge Nathan E. White yelled at Denise to leave the Starbucks (max. capacity less than 25 customers) and sit outside where he could see her, in the 100 plus degree heat. His lady friend sat through the meeting until Judge Nathan E. Whiteâ€™s conduct became too much for Eveline. Denise and Eveline left about thirty minutes after arrival.
Judge Nathan E. White next demanded that Denise meet him in the parking lot of a menâ€™s clothing store November 1, 2009 to give him repeat copies of bills, statements etc which attorneys and Denise had already faxed and copied him. White again yelled at Denise over the phone, saying â€œIâ€™m going to finish you off, lady.â€ His tone, words and demands to have a Trust meeting for any reason in a parking lot were so bizarre and threatening that Denise filed a police report. Police told her never to meet with any person in a parking lot to do business for any reason, especially a man who threatens her and her daughter. Judge Nathan E. White demanded that Denise and Eveline meet with him and his wife in a McKinney, TX grocery store the Saturday after American Thanksgiving 2009, again demanding that Denise and Eveline give him repeat copies of bills and statement etc which he had already received. Again, he became so abusive, humiliating Denise and Eveline in public that written communications are the only way Denise and Eveline communicate with him on any matter, with Denise as Statutory Durable Power of Attorney of Fact for Eveline of record.
Probate Court Clerks report in writing that the Probate Court fails to maintain records material to these matters.
William M. Windsor
I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney. This website expresses my OPINIONS. The comments of visitors or guest authors to the website are their opinions and do not therefore reflect my opinions. Anyone mentioned in any article is welcome to file a response. This website does not provide legal advice. I do not give legal advice. I do not practice law. This website is to expose government corruption, law enforcement corruption, political corruption, and judicial corruption. Whatever this website says about the law is presented in the context of how I or others perceive the applicability of the law to a set of circumstances if I (or some other author) was in the circumstances under the conditions discussed. Despite of my concerns about lawyers in general, I suggest that anyone with legal questions consult an attorney for an answer, particularly after reading anything on this website. The law is a gray area at best. Please read our Legal Notice and Terms.I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney. This website expresses my OPINIONS. The comments of visitors or guest authors to the website are their opinions and do not therefore reflect my opinions. Anyone mentioned in any article is welcome to file a response. This website does not provide legal advice. I do not give legal advice. I do not practice law. This website is to expose government corruption, law enforcement corruption, political corruption, and judicial corruption. Whatever this website says about the law is presented in the context of how I or others perceive the applicability of the law to a set of circumstances if I (or some other author) was in the circumstances under the conditions discussed. Despite of my concerns about lawyers in general, I suggest that anyone with legal questions consult an attorney for an answer, particularly after reading anything on this website. The law is a gray area at best. Please read our Legal Notice and Terms.