Atlanta Georgia federal Judge Thomas W. Thrash has charged a Plaintiff $6 Million Dollars as a court filing fee. Every other plaintiff pays $350.
We’ll, to be precise, Judge Thomas W. Thrash charged only $5,950,000.
This is a corrupt act by Judge Thomas W. Thrash that joins the Judicial Corruption Hall of Shame with the judge who filed a $67 million dollar lawsuit against a dry cleaners for misplacing a pair of pants….
Judge Thomas W. Thrash, a DEFENDANT in the litigation, has already refused to recuse himself, so he is presiding over a case in which he is a lead defendant. So, hey, when you will do anything to keep from losing a major lawsuit, being indicted, convicted, imprisoned, impeached, and disgraced, why not create a big monument to the denial of the right to petition the government for redress of grievances? A $6 million monument no less.
This gives a whole new meaning to the best defense is a good offense.
Judge Thomas W. Thrash issued this unprecedented order on October 26, 2011 in the case of William M. Windsor v. Thomas W. Thrash, et al (See 1:11-CV-02326-TWT — Docket #63). Judge Thomas W. Thrash commits massive perjury in this order as well.
|Lee Majors, The Original Six Million Dollar Man
Judge Thomas W. Thrash,The New Six Million Dollar Man
Judge Thomas W. Thrash is a criminal disguised in the black robes of a federal judge. The list of his criminal violations is looooong. There are hundreds of crimes and violations of the rules and laws in just one case that Judge Thomas W. Thrash is currently handling.
William M. Windsor has criminal charges and a Judicial Misconduct Complaint pending against Judge Thomas W. Thrash. Judge Thomas W. Thrash, mega criminal.
William M. Windsor
I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney. This website expresses my OPINIONS. The comments of visitors to the website are their opinions and do not therefore reflect my opinions. This website does not provide legal advice. I do not give legal advice. I do not practice law. This website is to expose corruption in government, law enforcement, and the judiciary. Whatever this website says about the law is presented in the context of how I or others perceive the applicability of the law to a set of circumstances if I (or some other author) was in the circumstances under the conditions discussed. Despite of my concerns about lawyers in general, I suggest that anyone with legal questions consult an attorney for an answer, particularly after reading anything on this website. The law is a gray area at best. Please read our Legal Notice and Terms.