Bill Windsor of Lawless America has taken the issue of Montana Judicial Corruption to the United States Supreme Court.
This is William M. Windsor’s sixth petition to the U.S. Supreme Court. He is 0 for 5, so his odds are theoretically improving.
The issue is whether a defendant in a criminal case should have an unbiased judge…
Seems like a no-brainer, but it’s not.
The odds of the U.S. Supreme Court even considering Bill Windsor’s appeal are 1 in 100. Because it is Bill Windsor, who has openly called the U.S. Supreme Court justices traitors to the Constitution, the odds are probably 1 in 300,000,000.
But Bill is taking the shot because it is the only chance he has. Judge James A. Haynes was hand-picked to handle Bill Windsor’s criminal trial in Missoula Montana because he has a relationship with Sean Boushie, the alleged complainant – the man who attempted to murder Bill Windsor, and he has previously protected Sean Boushie from a petition for a protective order filed by William M. Windsor. Judge James A. Haynes actually ordered that Bill did not qualify for a protective order against Sean Boushie after he attempted to kill him because Sean Boushie had not been arrested and convicted. Everyone in America knows protective orders are issued to protect people before law enforcement gets involved.
Bill Windsor filed a motion asking Judge James A. Haynes to disqualify himself. He refused. He filed a motion for reconsideration, and Judge James A. Haynes again refused to recuse himself.
This left Bill Windsor with an appeal to federal court as his only option. Bill was told that he had to first appeal to the U.S. District Court for Montana, but that turned out to be absolutely wrong. His only appeal is directly to the United States Supreme Court, so he has now done so.
Bill is hoping that the U.S. Supreme Court justices do not know that it was his CRIME SCENE BANNER that was draped in front of the Supreme Court. But they already hate him, so it doesn’t really matter. When the U.S. Supreme Court said “we refuse” to Bill Windsor’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus asking the justices to tell the federal judges that they had to abide by the Constitution, Bill did not pull any punches when he responded asking for a rehearing. If Bill Windsor thinks you are a crook, he’s going to tell you so, and he told the U.S. Supreme Court Justices.
Bill Windsor has been operating with erroneous information that indicated he would be able to appeal any conviction to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Now that he knows his only appeal of a conviction is to the corrupt Montana Supreme Court and then to the impossible-to-reach United States Supreme Court, this means that if William M. Windsor is found guilty in the Fourth Judicial District Court in Missoula Montana, his goose is cooked.
For a quick update on Bill Windsor’s saga and upcoming trial, see this summary on LawlessAmerica.com.
If you want to reach Bill Windsor, his home address is 5013 S Louise Ave #1134, Sioux Falls, SD 57108. That mail gets forwarded to him once a week. His email is Pro-Sefirstname.lastname@example.org. His phone is currently confidential, but it is not answered; messages are checked by dialing in to Verizon from a state far, far away, and Bill receives an email with the name, number, and one sentence summary of each message.
For the Lawless America videos, see www.YouTube.com/lawlessamerica. Bill Windsor’s Facebook page is www.facebook.com/billwindsor1 Bill Windsor’s Twitter account is www.twitter.com/lawlessamerica. And click here for the Lawless America Facebook page that has just magically reappeared.
Photo copyright Friends of Bill Windsor
I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney. This website expresses my OPINIONS. The comments of visitors or guest authors to the website are their opinions and do not therefore reflect my opinions. Anyone mentioned by name in any article is welcome to file a response. This website does not provide legal advice. I do not give legal advice. I do not practice law. This website is to expose government corruption, law enforcement corruption, political corruption, and judicial corruption. Whatever this website says about the law is presented in the context of how I or others perceive the applicability of the law to a set of circumstances if I (or some other author) was in the circumstances under the conditions discussed. Despite my concerns about lawyers in general, I suggest that anyone with legal questions consult an attorney for an answer, particularly after reading anything on this website. The law is a gray area at best. Please read our Legal Notice and Terms.