Judge Patricia Warner, a domestic-relations judge in Montgomery, Alabama, faces a 127-page civil complaint alleging that she acted corruptly in more than two dozen cases.
The Alabama Judicial Inquiry Commission (JIC) served the complaint yesterday on former Montgomery County Circuit Judge Patricia Warner, who abruptly announced her retirement after being elected to a second term in November.
The 74 charges repeatedly use the term â€œbad faithâ€ to describe Judge Patricia Warnerâ€™s actions. The legal definition of bad faith is â€œthe fraudulent deception of another person; the intentional or malicious refusal to perform some duty or contractual obligation.â€
Judge Patricia Warner repeatedly ignored instructions from higher courts, according to the complaint. From the Montgomery Advertiser:
â€œHer disregard of (legal) standards, although given specific notice by the appellate courts, further evidences her bad faith and her intentional disregard of her duty to decide cases based on the law and the facts presented to her court in handling the matters alleged (in this complaint),â€ according to the complaint served Monday.
Of 29 cases where Warnerâ€™s judgment was questioned, the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed only two, according to the complaint.
â€œThe other twenty-seven appellate opinions all pointed out major flaws requiring reversal in Judge Warnerâ€™s handling of each case. In most cases, Judge Warnerâ€™s legal errors were clear and obviously warranted reversal,â€ according to the report.
We had three reactions upon hearing that an Alabama judge might actually be held accountable for gross misconduct:
(2) What took you so long?
(3) When are you going to start inquiring into the dozens of other Alabama judges who can match Warner step for step in the corruption department?
Our delight at seeing a bad judge outed is tempered by several doses of reality. The Alabama JIC is a notoriously toothless watchdog. I have filed multiple complaints with the JIC, only to receive a form letter stating that my allegations would not even be investigated. I know of numerous individuals who have received similar responses. So why is the JIC taking action against Judge Patricia Warner? Our guess is that her corrupt acts were simply over the top, she pushed the wrong political button at the wrong time, or she ticked off the wrong person or institutional body. Letâ€™s address these three possibilities:
* Warner was â€œover the topâ€â€“Iâ€™ve read the entire complaint against Judge Patricia Warner, and while she is an abominable judge, she is not all that unusual in Alabama. In fact, weâ€™ve written about other domestic-relations cases where judges have behaved at least as bad as Judge Patricia Warnerâ€“if not worse.
We have the Jefferson County case of Joseph Blackburn, who was victimized by a hunting club where corrupt lawyers and judges cook domestic relations cases; former judges Charles Calhoun and R.A. â€œSonnyâ€ Ferguson cheated Blackburn and many others.
We have the Jefferson County case of Angela Turner Drees, who also got caught in the hunting-club trap, with Ferguson applying the primary cheat job.
We have the Shelby County case of Sherry Carroll Rollins, which might be the single most grotesque cheat job Iâ€™ve ever encountered in courtâ€“and that is saying something. Judge D. Al Crowson took the case, even though jurisdiction already had been established in South Carolina. Crowson proceeded to cut an exceedingly favorable deal for Ted Rollins, Sherry Rollinsâ€™ ex husband. Why would Crowson do that? Well, Ted Rollins is a member of one of Americaâ€™s richest families, the folks behind Orkin Pest Control, and he has strong ties to Bradley Arant, one of Birminghamâ€™s most influential law firms.
How bad are these cases? Blackburn and Drees are lawyers, members of the legal club, but the corruption theyâ€™ve witnessed was so bad that they filed federal lawsuits over the handling of their divorce cases. Thatâ€™s not something lawyers do on a regular basis.
* Warner pushed the wrong political buttonâ€“One of the counts against Judge Patricia Warner was for a case involving Kimberly McGregor Brown, the daughter of gambling magnate Milton McGregor. The complaint alleges that Judge Patricia Warner took thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from Milton McGregor and then gave his daughter favorable treatment in a child-custody case.
This might, indeed, be a matter of serious corruption on Judge Patricia Warnerâ€™s part. But itâ€™s interesting to note that McGregor currently is the most high-profile defendant in the ongoing federal electronic-bingo prosecution in Alabama. Did Judge Patricia Warner simply pick a bad time to side with Milton McGregor, just when federal prosecutors are trying to take him down? We suspect the answer is yes.
* Warner ticked off the wrong person or institutional bodyâ€“From reading the complaint, one gets the impression that the JIC was not all that concerned that Judge Patricia Warner was cheating a bunch of everyday folks. But when she essentially said â€œscrew youâ€ to the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals and the Alabama Supreme Court . . . well, that was too much. This, we would guess, is the single biggest reason Judge Patricia Warner now finds herself in serious doo-doo.
Is the JIC suddenly serious about all of the judicial corruption that mars the Alabama landscape? We doubt it. The complaint against Judge Patricia Warner states, over and over, that she â€œfailed to follow established law in her ordersâ€ (page 96), showed â€œintentional disregard of the laws and facts in matters pending before herâ€ (page 103), issued judgments that were â€œplainly and palpably wrongâ€ (page 111).
Numerous other Alabama judges do the same thing. Iâ€™ve written about them for four-plus years on this blog. Iâ€™ve filed appeals about â€œplainly and palpably wrongâ€ decisions with the Alabama appellate courts, only to have them issue an â€œaffirmed, no opinionâ€ ruling. Multiple lawyers have told me theyâ€™ve had similar experiences with their own appeals.
Weâ€™re glad to see that Judge Patricia Warner might get what she deserves. But we doubt that the Alabama JIC is serious about cleaning up our courts. JIC needed to make an example of someone, and Judge Patricia Warner proved to be that personâ€“probably for reasons that have nothing to do with protecting the general public.
On January 27 2012, the Alabama Judicial Inquiry Commission let former Judge Patricia Warner off.
Former Montgomery County family court Judge Patricia Warner and the Judicial Inquiry Commission filed an agreement that forbids Warner from ever serving as a judge in Alabama again.
Warner has lived in North Dakota since abruptly retiring from the bench last June, days before an ethics complaint containing 74 separate charges was filed against her.
Under the terms of the agreement, the Alabama Court of Judiciary found that Warner created “the appearance of impropriety” in a child custody case, in violation of Canon 2 of the state Canons of Judicial Ethics.
The remaining 73 charges against Warner — including accusations of mishandled cases and entering orders without hearings or evidence to support them — were dismissed.
Attribution: Alabama Political Reporter
I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney. This website expresses my OPINIONS. The comments of visitors or guest authors to the website are their opinions and do not therefore reflect my opinions. Anyone mentioned by name in any article is welcome to file a response. This website does not provide legal advice. I do not give legal advice. I do not practice law. This website is to expose government corruption, law enforcement corruption, political corruption, and judicial corruption. Whatever this website says about the law is presented in the context of how I or others perceive the applicability of the law to a set of circumstances if I (or some other author) was in the circumstances under the conditions discussed. Despite my concerns about lawyers in general, I suggest that anyone with legal questions consult an attorney for an answer, particularly after reading anything on this website. The law is a gray area at best. Please read our Legal Notice and Terms.