Federal Judges in Washington DC are CORRUPT!

Corrupt Judge Richard J. Leon

If you run into corrupt federal judges where you live, file an action in Washington, DC.

That’s what William M. Windsor did.

He immediately discovered that the corruption is just as big there.

Judge Richard J. Leon is a criminal hiding behind a robe, and he’s just one of many…

On February 5, 2010, William M. Windsor filed a Verified Complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.  As Bill Windsor was pro se, the case was assigned to Judge Richard J. Leon, whose specialty is abusing all pro se parties.  He is apparently assigned all pro se cases.

Judge Richard J. Leon  immediately dismissed the case after REFUSING to allow Bill Windsor to present his Motion for Temporary Restraining Order after he flew to DC from Atlanta for that purpose.  No attorney would ever be denied their TRO hearing!

Bill Windsor appealed, and his appellate brief blew Judge Richard J. Leon out of the water because he had no legal basis for what he did.  Judges Ginsburg, Tatel, and Brown were unable to defend Judge Richard J. Leon‘s bogus ruling, so they corruptly stated that there was no basis upon which William M. Windsor could sue.  This is corruption at its finest.  There was no evidence before the court except Windsor’s evidence and extensive sworn testimony.   These judges ruled that the following causes of action are not valid, and each and every one of them is as valid as can be:

INDEPENDENT ACTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENTS, ORDERS, AND PROCEEDINGS, AND TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT FOR FRAUD UPON THE COURTS — FRCP Rule 60(d)(1) and the Court’s Inherent Powers; Violation of Georgia RICO Act — O.C.G.A. 16-14-1 et seq; Violation of Federal Civil RICO Act– 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c); Violation of Federal RICO Conspiracy Offense — 18 USC § 1962(d); Violation of Due Process and Deprivation of Rights — 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics; Violation of Due Process and Deprivation of Rights — 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2); Violation of Constitutional Rights — First Amendment and in General; Violation of Constitutional Rights — Fifth Amendment; Violation of Constitutional Rights — Sixth Amendment; Violation of Constitutional Rights — Seventh Amendment; Violation of Constitutional Rights — Ninth Amendment; Violation of Constitutional Rights — Fourteenth Amendment; Judicial Misconduct; Conspiracy to Violate Windsor’s Constitutional Rights; Violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 – Denial of Equal Rights under the Law; Violation of Pro Se Rights; Violation of 42 U.S.C. Section 1985 (2) – Obstruction of Justice; Violation of 42 U.S.C. Section 1985 (3) – Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights; Violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1986 – Action for Neglect to Prevent Wrongs; Violation of 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 – Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States; Intentional Common Law Torts; Fraud; Interfering With Right To Petition Government; Negligent Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage; Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress; Violation of Constitutional Due Process; Abuse Of Process; Conspiracy pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1985; Denial of Due Process by Judge Evans by Ignoring MIST-1 for Eight Months; Violation of Legal Rights by Judge Evans by acting without Jurisdiction; Conspiracy to Commit Fraud. Windsor also argued for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law or for establishing new law. The whole idea of justice requires a fair trial with an impartial judge. When the judge is so obviously biased that the judge ignores the facts and the law, invents facts that do not exist in the record, completely ignores charges of hundreds of counts of perjury, ignores the laws regarding summary judgments, consistently violates its own rulings to favor of Maid, has extensive ex parte dealings with Maid’s attorneys, and does the many other things that Judge Evans has done, it really shouldn’t matter where the bias comes from. In a case such as this, it was absolutely impossible for Bill Windsor to have a fair trial.

PREDICATE ACTS: Perjury — Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1621; Perjury — Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623; Obstruction of Justice — Conspiracy to Defraud United States — 18 U.S.C. § 371; Obstruction of Justice and Witness Tampering — 18 U.S.C. § 1503; Obstruction of Justice — Conspiracy to Defraud United States — 18 U.S.C. § 371; False Unsworn Statements — Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1746; False Swearing — Making False Statements — Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001; Subornation of Perjury — Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001; Subornation of Perjury — Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1503; Subornation of Perjury — Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1621; Subornation of Perjury — Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623; Conspiracy to Suborn Perjury — Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1622; Misprision of a Felony; Treason to the Constitution.

Bill Windsor filed a Petition for Rehearing, and Judges Douglas H. Ginsburg, David S. Tatel, and Janice Rogers Brown refused to correct their corrupt ruling.  Bill Windsor also filed a Petition for Rehearing En Banc, and Judges David B. Sentelle, Douglas H. Ginsburg, Karen LeCraft Henderson, Judith W. Rogers, David S. Tatel, Merrick B. Garland, Janice Rogers Brown, Thomas B. Griffith, and Brett M. Kavanaugh claimed there was no error and refused to review the case.  There is no valid defense for their corrupt position.

These judges are CORRUPT.  These judges must be impeached because many of the judges from the DC Circuit become Supreme Court Justices.

On May 13, 2011, Bill Windsor announced he is filing criminal charges against each of these judges with the Washington, DC Grand Jury.

Gee, I wonder what these judges found in the lawsuit that caused them to stop it from proceeding?  Here’s the Preliminary Statement from the Verified Petition: 

William M. Windsor (“Windsor” or “Plaintiff”) hereby files this AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT.   Plaintiff shows the Court as follows:

Federal Judge Orinda D. Evans (“Judge Evans”) and Federal Judge William S. Duffey (“Judge Duffey”) are corrupt.

1. The actions of Judge Evans, Judge Duffey, Judge Julie E. Carnes (“Judge Carnes”), Judge Joel F. Dubina (“Judge Dubina”), and the judges of the Eleventh Circuit bring shame on the legal system and the federal judiciary. These officers of the court have conspired to perpetrate fraud directed squarely at the integrity of the decision-making of the federal courts. Intentional misstatements of facts or omissions of material facts with knowledge of falsity, or in reckless disregard for whether statements were true or false were made by Judge Evans and Judge Duffey.
2. This civil action is about the most fundamental legal issues that exist: justice; honesty; fair play; equal protection; due process; Constitutional protections; the right to a fair trial before an impartial judge; the requirement that witnesses, attorneys, and judges tell the truth; the requirement that witnesses, attorneys, and judges do not violate the laws of the state and the country, abuse litigants, and commit fraud upon the courts.
3. This civil action is about these dishonest federal judges, a judicial system that tramples the Constitutional rights of U.S. citizens, and the failure of the various individuals and authorities established to protect citizens to do anything about this.
4. The United States government has committed fraud. The government told Bill Windsor that he would be protected by the Constitution. The government knew this was not true. Bill Windsor believed the government. Bill Windsor was not protected, and he was damaged.
5. The serious issues presented herein came to the attention of Bill Windsor through his experience in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (“N.D.Ga.”) and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (“Eleventh Circuit”). A massive fraud upon the courts has been perpetrated by Maid of the Mist Corporation (“MOTM”), Maid of the Mist Steamboat Company Ltd (“Steamboat”), Maid’s Attorneys — Hawkins & Parnell (“H&P”) and Mr. Carl Hugo Anderson, (“Mr. Anderson”), Judge Orinda D. Evans (“Judge Evans”), and Judge William S. Duffey (“Judge Duffey”).
6. While Windsor does not have proof that judges have been paid to make decisions, it is one of the only logical explanations for what is taking place.
7. District Court judges in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (“N.D.Ga.”) ignore the facts; invent their own facts; ignore the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”), the Local Rules, and the Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE”); ignore the law; ignore applicable case law; cite erroneous case law; commit perjury by making statements that they know to be false in their orders; violate parties’ rights in any way they can; commit obstruction of justice; and trample the Constitutional rights of litigants without a thought. They manipulate the judicial system to deprive parties such as Windsor of their legal and Constitutional rights.
8. Appellate Court judges in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (“Eleventh Circuit”) ignore the facts; ignore the points of error of appellants; ignore the law; ignore applicable case law; cite erroneous case law; issue short, inadequate decisions; do whatever it takes to support their friends at the District Courts; and trample the Constitutional rights of litigants.
9. The judicial system supports this dishonesty and illegality. The “system” denies any form of valid recourse for an aggrieved citizen.
10. Aggrieved citizens find it next to impossible to take legal action against judges. Judges ignore perjury. There is no law that permits an aggrieved citizen to sue over perjury. The only recourse against a N.D.Ga. federal judge is to file a complaint with the Judicial Council of the Eleventh Circuit (“Judicial Council”). The complaints must be no more than five pages. The Judicial Council ignores valid complaints and claims there is no proof when there is plenty. The aggrieved citizens have no recourse. Since the Supreme Court isn’t really in the business of correcting errors by the lower courts, the N.D.Ga. and the Eleventh Circuit combine to have tyrannical power.
11. The Chief Judges of N.D.Ga. and the Eleventh Circuit, Judge Julie E. Carnes (“Judge Carnes”) and Judge Joel F. Dubina (“Judge Dubina”), have ignored the wrongdoing of their fellow judges, Judge Evans and Judge Duffey. Windsor wrote to them to complain. Windsor was ignored. These judges support the wrongdoing, and they actively participate in the wrongdoing.
12. The Judicial Council (headed by Judge Dubina) ignores the facts; ignores the law; says and does whatever it takes to protect their fellow judges; and tramples the Constitutional and legal rights of U.S. citizens. Windsor filed a complaint against Judge Evans, and it was not pursued. The Judicial Council ignored massive dishonesty and criminal violations.
13. The United States of America, the U.S. Department of Justice, Attorney General Eric Holder, United States Attorney Sally Quillian Yates, Assistant United States Attorney Gentry Shelnutt, the Senate Judiciary Committee and its Chairman, Senator Patrick Leahy, the House Judiciary Committee and its Chairman, Congressman John Conyers, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and Special Agent Gregory Jones ignored complaints from Windsor about the Constitutional violations of the federal judges in N.D.Ga. and the Eleventh Circuit. Through their inaction, they have endorsed violation of the Constitutional protections granted the citizens of the United States that they are supposed to protect. (Exhibit 3 hereto.)
14. It should be federal policy that judges and government officials who break the law should lose any and all protection.
15. In an alleged effort to insulate judges from regular legal actions against them, these same judges have obliterated the fundamental rights of U.S. citizens. Judges have been sanctioned to commit crimes and break laws with no concern about consequences.
16. In the “Factual Background” of the Verified Complaint, Windsor provided a detailed look at what has taken place in three civil actions in the N.D.Ga. and the Eleventh Circuit. Windsor identified judicial violations and explains how his Constitutional rights were violated. The Verified Complaint would be twice as long if he had included all of the false statements made by Judge Evans, Maid of the Mist, and Maid of the Mist’s Attorneys. The false statements and the proof of the false statements from citations to the record are referenced and available for this Court.
17. This is not the story of one litigant upset with rulings in his case. This is the story of the fantasy of Constitutional rights and justice in the United States federal courts in Atlanta, Georgia.
18. Windsor hereby reports the crimes described herein to this Court pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4 and asks that this information be presented to a federal grand jury.
19. Windsor also hopes that the House and Senate Judiciary Committees will investigate. Judge Evans and Judge Duffey’s names should be added to the list with Alcee Hastings, John Pickering, Samuel Chase, West Hughes Humphrey, Mark W. Delahay, Charles Swain, Robert W. Archibald, George W. English, Harold Louderback, Halsted L. Ritter, Harry Claiborne, Walter Nixon, and Samuel B. Kent.
20. Windsor brings this action pursuant in part to 28 U.S. C. § 1331, to redress the deprivation of rights secured him by the Constitution and the First, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. §1983, 42 U.S.C. §1988, and the common law and redressable pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Narcotics Agents 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
21. This Verified Complaint includes an independent action in equity for relief from orders, judgments, and injunctions issued in N.D.Ga. Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-0714-ODE (“MIST-1”),[1] Civil Action No. 1:09-CV-01453-WSD (“Deposition Action”), and Civil Action No. 1:09-CV-02027-WSD (“MIST-2″) through fraud upon the courts.
22. This is also an action for declaratory relief pursuant to Title 28, U.S.C. § 2201 & 2202; for injunctive relief, pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”); and for other relief. All of the relief requested is itemized in the Prayer at the end of this Verified Complaint.

Judge Richard J. Leon does not allow pro se parties to file motions — absolute violation of the rights of due process.  I sent several motions for filing in March.  They were returned in May WITHOUT a valid order and no record in the court docket.

From the response to four petitions that I filed with the United States Supreme Court, I know that all of the justices are corrupt.  This gives me a total of 19 federal judges in Washington, DC to bring criminal charges against.  I will do so the week of May 16, 2011.

William M. Windsor

{jcomments on}