Judge Joel Dubina is dishonest.
Judge Dubina ignores the law and the facts.
I make these statements as fact, not opinions.
In appeals and matters involving me, Judge Joel Dubina issued an order affirming Judge Evans’ original decision in our case on October 21, 2008 by ignoring all of the points of error and saying that disputed fact issues are not a bar to summary judgment. Any lawyer and any judge will tell you that perhaps the single most widely known law is that a summary judgment cannot be granted when there is a fact issue. In our case, the entire case hinged on one issue. We said there was a contract. Maid of the Mist said they didn’t know about a contract. That is a fact issue. It must then be left for a jury to decide who is to be believed. [See The “You be The Judge” section for the proof of this wrongdoing by Judge Joel Dubina and Judge Hull.]
Judge Dubina essentially ignored a misconduct complaint regarding Judge Evans. [Consider the information that Judge Dubina said did not indicate misconduct by Judge Orinda D. Evans.]
Judge Dubina ignored a request as the Chief Judge of the Eleventh Circuit for a meeting regarding Judge Evans. Consider the letter that I sent to him. he didn’t even respond:
September 28, 2009
The Honorable Joel F. Dubina
United States Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
75 Spring Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3361
Dear Judge Dubina:
Today, I have filed a MOTION FOR JUDICIAL INTERVENTION BY CHIEF JUDGE JULIE E. CARNES OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, CHIEF JUDGE JOEL F. DUBINA OF THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN G. ROBERTS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC E. HOLDER, SENATOR PATRICK J. LEAHY, AND REPRESENTATIVE JOHN CONYERS JR. TO ENSURE THAT LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND COURT POLICIES ARE FOLLOWED IN THIS CIVIL ACTION AND VIOLATION OF WILLIAM M. WINDSOR’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ARE CORRECTED.
Judge Joel Dubina, if the Eleventh Circuit is not corrupt, I appeal to you to do something to correct these problems in my case.
Will you meet with me for a discussion?
Will you schedule a conference between Judge Evans, Judge Duffey, Judge Carnes, yourself, the Plaintiffs’ attorneys, and me?
Is it possible for you to appoint someone to investigate what has happened in this case? Is it possible for you to appoint a new judge from a different District to hold an evidentiary hearing to review the serious issues that I have raised?
Is it possible for you to allow me to pay a non-attorney non-judge mediator to spend a few days looking into the issues that I have raised and issue a report to Judge Carnes and you?
Is it possible for there to be a public debate between me on one side and the Plaintiffs, Judge Evans, Judge Duffey, and Judge Carnes on the other side?
Since everything possible is being done to block my ability to obtain justice in the judicial system in Atlanta, is there anything else that can be done?
Please do something.
William M. Windsor
Judge Joel Dubina did NOTHING. He ignored this. Now how could any decent, honest judge ignore this?
Judge Joel Dubina committed perjury in an order on my judicial misconduct complaint. He claimed there was no evidence of misconduct when I submitted massive evidence.
He committed perjury in an outrageous order affirming Judge Orinda D. Evans’ December 22, 2009 Order.
He issued an unbelievably bogus order affirming Judge Evans’ original decision on summary judgment on 10-21-2008 in which he ignored all of the points of error. In the 10-21-2008 order, Judge Joel Dubina ruled, in essence, that anything an appellant says doesn’t count; summary judgment is appropriate whenever there are fact issues; and a judge has to be right and an appellant has to be wrong.
Judge Joel Dubina was nominated by President George H.W. Bush on June 7, 1990.
I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney. This website expresses my OPINIONS. The comments of visitors or guest authors to the website are their opinions and do not, therefore, reflect my opinions. Anyone mentioned by name in any article is welcome to file a response. This website does not provide legal advice. I do not give legal advice. I do not practice law. This website is to expose judicial corruption, government corruption, law enforcement corruption, attorney wrongdoing/corruption, and political corruption. Whatever this website says about the law is presented in the context of how I or others perceive the applicability of the law to a set of circumstances if I (or some other author) was in the circumstances under the conditions discussed. Despite my concerns about lawyers in general, I suggest that anyone with legal questions consult an attorney for an answer, particularly after reading anything on this website. The law is a gray area at best. Please read our Legal Notice and Terms.