 |
On August 21, 2013, Sean Boushie signed a sworn affidavit before a notary, and he swore that Bill Windsor was carrying a gun and that he intends to be involved in a shootout. The false sworn affidavit was used to get William M. Windsor arrested and jailed for 134 days.
This article provides evidence that law enforcement needs to establish that Sean Boushie should be charged with false swearing, perjury, and filing a false police report...
CRIMINAL CHARGE AGAINST SEAN BOUSHIE: On August 21, 2013, Sean Boushie signed a sworn affidavit before a notary public as part of his Petition for Temporary Order of Protection. In the sworn affidavit, he stated:
“He claims to be carrying a firearm, per his denied request for a TOP in Ravalli County, and has posted photos of himself wearing a bullet proof vest, insinuating that he intends to be involved in a shootout with me or the police.”
This is absolutely false, and Sean Boushie published statements in which he acknowledged that Bill Windsor did not have a gun. At no time did Bill Windsor ever claim to be carrying a firearm. He said exactly the opposite. Bill Windsor published well in advance that he would be wearing a bulletproof vest in Montana because of the death threats from Sean Boushie. Bill Windsor is known to be absolutely non-violent. he had no gun in Montana, and his only intention was to expose Sean Boushie as the criminal that Bill Windsor knows him to be.
EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE CRIMINAL CHARGE AGAINST SEAN Boushie:
On August 21, 2013, to obtain a protective order, Sean Boushie swore under penalty of perjury that William M. Windsor had a gun in Montana. He wrote “he claims to be carrying a firearm” and that he was carrying a firearm “on person.” [A true and correct copy of this is on the Flash Drive marked as Exhibit A, Exhibit = 2013-08-21-Boushie-v-Windsor-Petition-for-Protective-Order – unnumbered pages 1, 3, 11.]
As William M. Windsor has said before and will be happy to say while connected to a polygraph, he did not take a gun to Montana in August 2013 or at any time, and he never said he claimed to be carrying a firearm. William M. Windsor made this known to Judge Sam Warren and Missoula County Montana Judge John W. Larson in Exhibit 41 in the folder named Missoula Montana Criminal case, the Motion for Modification, ¶¶17 and 30. The Affidavit of William M. Windsor dated january 16,. 2015 includes two published statements where Sean Boushie notes that William M. Windsor published that he did not have a gun, paragraphs 638 (“First he said he no longer carried his judge gun.”) and 642 (“I thought he got rid of his little gun….”).
These statements were published on July 29, 2013 and July 31, 2014, when William M. Windsor was just about to arrive in Montana. [A true and correct copy of an article where William M. Windsor published that he would not be bringing a gun to Montana is on the Flash Drive in the folder “Facebook Downloads, in the subfolder Lawless America Facebook.] [A true and correct copy of the published statements of Sean Boushie noting that William M. Windsor would not have a gun in Montana are on the Flash Drive in the folder named Blogspot — tinyfeetnhands – July 29, 2013 at 9:25 PMtinyfeetnhands – July 31, 2013 at 12:00 AM .]
William M. Windsor’s ex-wife can testify that the Taurus Judge pistol that he purchased for protection was in her home in Atlanta, Georgia from April 4, 2013 to December 6, 2013, and it was not in Montana in August 2013. This information was filed in the underlying case. [William M. Windsor swore that his ex-wife could testify that she had the gun in Georgia is on the Flash Drive — Exhibit 29 in the folder named Missoula Montana Criminal Case, ¶23. Exhibit 56 is the Motion for Discovery filed August 18, 2014, and it explains this in paragraph 2 as a deposition by telephone is requested with his ex-wife.]
These lies are what enabled Sean Boushie to obtain a Temporary Order of Protection against Bill Windsor on August 23, 2013. Sean Boushie’s first attempt to obtain a temporary order of protection was denied. So, he added the claim that Bill Windsor had a gun and was committing assault. Based upon that fabrication, he obtained the Temporary Order of Protection.
Sean Boushie claims the petition for a temporary order of protection in Ravalli County says Bill Windsor was carrying a firearm. False. Make him show it, When he can’t, that’s proof of this false swearing.
MONTANA STATUTES VIOLATED:
45-7-202. False swearing. (1) A person commits the offense of false swearing if the person knowingly makes a false statement under oath or equivalent affirmation or swears or affirms the truth of a statement previously made when the person does not believe the statement to be true and:
(a) the falsification occurs in an official proceeding;
(b) the falsification is purposely made to mislead a public servant in performing an official function; or
(c) the statement is one that is required by law to be sworn or affirmed before a notary or other person authorized to administer oaths.
(2) Subsections (4) through (7) of 45-7-201 apply to this section.
(3) Except as provided in 13-35-240, a person convicted of false swearing shall be fined an amount not to exceed $500 or be imprisoned in the county jail for a term not to exceed 6 months, or both.
45-7-201. Perjury. (1) A person commits the offense of perjury if in any official proceeding the person knowingly makes a false statement under oath or equivalent affirmation or swears or affirms the truth of a statement previously made when the statement is material.
(2) A person convicted of perjury shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for any term not to exceed 10 years or be punished by a fine of not more than $50,000, or both.
(3) Falsification is material, regardless of the admissibility of the statement under rules of evidence, if it could have affected the course or outcome of the proceeding. It is no defense that the declarant mistakenly believed the falsification to be immaterial. Whether a falsification is material in a given factual situation is a question of law.
(4) It is not a defense to prosecution under this section that the oath or affirmation was administered or taken in an irregular manner or that the declarant was not competent to make the statement. A document purporting to be made upon oath or affirmation at any time when the offender presents it as being so verified must be considered to have been sworn or affirmed.
(5) A person may not be guilty of an offense under this section if the person retracted the falsification in the course of the proceeding in which it was made before it became manifest that the falsification was or would be exposed and before the falsification substantially affected the proceeding.
(6) When the defendant made inconsistent statements under oath or equivalent affirmation, both having been made within the period of the statute of limitations, the prosecution may proceed by setting forth the inconsistent statements in a single count alleging in the alternative that one or the other was false and not believed by the defendant. In that case, it is not necessary for the prosecution to prove which statement was false but only that one or the other was false and not believed by the defendant to be true.
(7) A person may not be convicted of an offense under this section when proof of falsity rests solely upon the testimony of a single person other than the defendant.
45-7-205. False reports to law enforcement authorities. (1) A person commits an offense under this section if the person knowingly:
(a) gives false information to any law enforcement officer with the purpose to implicate another;
(b) reports to law enforcement authorities an offense or other incident within their concern knowing that it did not occur; or
(c) pretends to furnish law enforcement authorities with information relating to an offense or incident when the person knows that the person has no information relating to the offense or incident.
(2) A person convicted under this section shall be fined not to exceed $500 or be imprisoned in the county jail for any term not to exceed 6 months, or both.
WHAT THE MISSOULA POLICE DEPARTMENT NEEDS TO DO TO HAVE NEEDED EVIDENCE:
1. Call Bill Windsor’s ex-wife, and she will confirm that she had the gun in her home.
2. Ask Sean Boushie when he was ever close enough to Bill Windsor to see if he had a gun. Bill Windsor has never been around Sean Boushie except on March 27, 2015 when Sean Boushie sat in the courtroom laughing at him and pointing his finger at Bill Windsor as if his hand was a gun.
3. See the articles online where Bill Windsor states that he does not have a gun. July 23, 2013 Article
4. Sean Boushie claims the petition for a temporary order of protection in Ravalli County says Bill Windsor was carrying a firearm. False. Make him show it, When he can’t, that’s proof of this false swearing.
5. Review the Petition for Temporary Order of Protection filed in Ravalli County.
Photo copyright Imgarcade