 |
This is Part 3 of an article that proves how federal Judge Thomas W. Thrash commits crimes while hiding behind his black robe and his mega-ugly scowl.
It can take a lot of work to understand how the judges screw, glue, and tattoo pro se parties, but in this relatively simple case, all it takes is a little reading.
Please read along, and check the various court filings to understand the various crimes. Then check what happened in your case(s)…
This is the saga of 2011CV202857 filed in the Fulton County Superior Court by me, William M. Windsor. It was illegally removed to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia where it became Civil Action No. 1:11-CV-01922-TWT, presided over by Judge Thomas W. Thrash.
To show what happened, I have reproduced almost all of the Court Docket in narrative form with links to all of the documents. [At the end of relevant docket entries, I have inserted my analysis and explanation within brackets.] I am not an attorney, and I do not give legal advice. This is the analysis of a pro se party who has not been to law school, but who has spent thousands of hours studying the law. I am producing this history and analysis in several parts. (See Part 1 and Part 2.) This is Part 3:
Civil Action No. 1:11-CV-01922-TWT (“01922”)
37. On June 29, 2011, William M. Windsor filed a REQUEST FOR CONSENT TO FILE AN EMERGENCY MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE ORDER ISSUING A FILING INJUNCTION (035-x1). (035-x1-2 is a true and correct copy of the cover letter sent with these papers.) (035-x1-3 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
[This was never docketed or processed. Judge Thomas W. Thrash issued a totally illegal filing injunction and then denied William M. Windsor the right that all litigants have to file a motion for reconsideration. Local Rule 7.2 E. of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia authorizes motions for reconsideration if filed within 28 days from the entry of the order. This MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION was filed two days after the order was entered. Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to docket the motion claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #41.) This is, of course, ridiculous. The order was TOTALLY improper, and motions for reconsideration are authorized by the Local Rules. Judge Thomas W. Thrash had to deny any and all rights of William M. Windsor so he could maintain the illegal filing restrictions to support the goals of the criminal racketeering operation within the federal courts in Atlanta, Georgia.]
38. On June 29, 2011, William M. Windsor also filed a REQUEST FOR CONSENT TO FILE A MOTION FOR HEARING ON MOTION TO COMMENCE DISCOVERY (035-x2). The motion was never docketed or processed. (035-x3-2 is a true and correct copy of the cover letter sent with this filing.) (035-x3-3 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
[Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to file claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #41.) This is, of course, ridiculous. Under Local Rule 7.1 E. of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, judges decide motions without a hearing unless a hearing is ordered by the judge. Therefore, a motion has to be filed requesting a hearing. Such motions cannot possibly be frivolous or be abuse of the judicial system. The last thing in the world Judge Thomas W. Thrash could allow would be for William M. Windsor to obtain discovery that would prove the criminal acts of the Defendants.]
39. On June 29, 2011, William M. Windsor also filed a REQUEST FOR CONSENT TO FILE A MOTION FOR HEARING ON MOTION TO DISQUALIFY (035-x3). The motion was never docketed or processed. (035-x3-2 is a true and correct copy of the cover letter sent with these papers.) (035-x3-3 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
[Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to file claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #41.) This is, of course, ridiculous. Under Local Rule 7.1 E. of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, judges decide motions without a hearing unless a hearing is ordered by the judge. Therefore, a motion has to be filed requesting a hearing. Such motions cannot possibly be frivolous or be abuse of the judicial system. Judge Thomas W. Thrash could not risk allowing William M. Windsor to have a hearing where corruption would be exposed in open court, so he denied all requests for hearings.]
40. On June 30, 2011, William M. Windsor filed a MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE OF NECESSITY. [01922 Docket #37.] (037-x1 is a true and correct copy of the cover letter sent with these papers.) (037-x2 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
[This is a motion that seeks to have a judge named to preside over the case from another federal circuit because every federal judge in Georgia is a defendant in cases filed by William M. Windsor, and they are friends with the judges who are Defendants in this Civil Action. Judge Thomas W. Thrash never ruled on this motion. This constitutes Obstruction of Justice — 18 U.S.C. § 1503 as well as multiple violations of the Canons of the Code of Judicial Conduct.]
41. On July 1, 2011, William M. Windsor filed WILLIAM M. WINDSOR’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT OF PREJUDICE OF THOMAS WOODROW THRASH. [01922 Docket #38.]
[This Affidavit documented filings made with the Clerk of the Court that had not appeared on the Docket, undoubtedly orchestrated by corrupt federal Judhe Thomas W. Thrash.]
42. On July 1, 2011, William M. Windsor filed three motions for hearings on different motions. On July 1, 2011, William M. Windsor filed a MOTION FOR HEARING ON MOTION TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY (038-x1). The motions were never docketed or processed. (038-x4 is a true and correct copy of the cover letter sent with these papers.) (038-x5 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
[Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to file claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #41.) This is, of course, ridiculous. Under Local Rule 7.1 E. of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, judges decide motions without a hearing unless a hearing is ordered by the judge. Therefore, a motion has to be filed requesting a hearing. Such motions cannot possibly be frivolous or be abuse of the judicial system. Judge Thomas W. Thrash never granted a hearing in this Civil Action because he did not want to allow evidence of the wrongdoing of the Defendants’ attorneys and himself to become part of the record of the court.]
43. On July 1, 2011, William M. Windsor filed a MOTION FOR HEARING ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER – DOCKET #25 (038-x2). The motion was never docketed or processed. (038-x4 is a true and correct copy of the cover letter sent with this filing.) (038-x5 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
[Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to file claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #41.) This is, of course, ridiculous. Under Local Rule 7.1 E. of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, judges decide motions without a hearing unless a hearing is ordered by the judge. Therefore, a motion has to be filed requesting a hearing. Such motions cannot possibly be frivolous or be abuse of the judicial system.]
44. On July 1, 2011, William M. Windsor filed a MOTION FOR HEARING ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER – DOCKET #19 (038-x3). The motion was never docketed or processed. (038-x4 is a true and correct copy of the cover letter sent with the filing.) (038-x5 is the Delivery Confirmation for the filing that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
[Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to file claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #41.) This is, of course, ridiculous. Under Local Rule 7.1 E. of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, judges decide motions without a hearing unless a hearing is ordered by the judge. Therefore, a motion has to be filed requesting a hearing. Such motions cannot possibly be frivolous or be abuse of the judicial system.]
45. On July 1, 2011, the Docket shows an unnumbered entry: CLERKS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING as to William M. Windsor re 01922 Docket #39 Order. (tcc) (Entered: 07/01/2011.)
[Unnumbered entries are illegal according to the statutes and rules. Everything done in a case is supposed to be docketed and numbered. William M. Windsor will testify that a number of alleged mailings by the Clerk of the Court were never received and probably were never mailed.]
46. On July 5, 2011, William M. Windsor filed a MOTION FOR REMAND (039-x1). The motion was never docketed or processed. (039-x1-4 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
[Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to docket the motion claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #41.) This is, of course, ridiculous. This is one of the most egregious things done by Judge Thomas W. Thrash. A plaintiff is REQUIRED to file a motion for remand within 30 days after an action has been removed from state to federal court. A check of the 01922 Docket shows that this MOTION FOR REMAND was never docketed. 30 days passed, and William M. Windsor was denied this essential legal right. By ignoring the Motion, Judge Thomas W. Thrash illegally maintained control of this lawsuit so he could dismiss it and deny all of William M. Windsor’s rights.]
47. On July 5, 2011, William M. Windsor filed an EMERGENCY MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE AMY TOTENBERG (039-x2). The motion was never docketed or processed. (039-x5 is a true and correct copy of the cover letter sent with these papers.) (039-x6 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
[Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to file claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #41.) This is, of course, ridiculous. A motion to recuse a judge cannot possibly be frivolous or an abuse of the judicial system. Judge Amy Totenberg issued an order in this Civil Action that proved her bias, so the Motion was absolutely proper.]
48. On July 5, 2011, William M. Windsor filed an EMERGENCY MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DATED JULY 1, 2011 (039-x3). The motion was never docketed or processed. (039-x5 is a true and correct copy of the cover letter sent with these papers.) (039-x6 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
[Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to file claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #41.) This is, of course, ridiculous. Local Rule 7.2 E. of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia authorizes motions for reconsideration if filed within 28 days from the entry of the order. This motionw as filed in four days. ]
49. On July 5, 2011, William M. Windsor filed a REQUEST FOR CONSENT TO FILE MOTION FOR HEARING ON MOTION ON PROPRIETY OF JUUDICIAL NOTICE (039-x4). (039-x5 is a true and correct copy of the cover letter sent with these papers.) (039-x6 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
[The motion was never docketed or processed. Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to file claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #41.) This is, of course, ridiculous. Under Local Rule 7.1 E. of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, judges decide motions without a hearing unless a hearing is ordered by the judge. Therefore, a motion has to be filed requesting a hearing. Such motions cannot possibly be frivolous or be abuse of the judicial system. The order was totally bogus; it had errors of fact and errors of law, which are the requirements for a motion for reconsideration.]
50. On July 7, 2011, Judge Thomas W. Thrash entered an order (01922 Docket #41) in which he denied permission “to file†papers received by the Clerk on 6/27/11, 6/29/11, 7/1/11, and 7/5/11.
[Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to file claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†These filings are listed in the paragraphs immediately above, and there is nothing frivolous or improper about any of them. Calling something “frivolous†is a patented corruption technique used by judges so they don’t have to explain a ruling that is totally indefensible. This is not a valid order because it is not signed, and it does not bear the seal of the court; this is a violation of the rules mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1691. Violations of Georgia state laws by Judge Thomas W. Thrash are: Perjury – O.C.G.A. § 16-10-70; False Swearing – Making False Statements – O.C.G.A. § 16-10-71 and O.C.G.A. 16-10-20; Conspiracy – O.C.G.A. § 16-4-8; violation of the RICO statute of the State of Georgia, violations of federal laws by Judge Thomas W. Thrash are: False Swearing – Making False Statements – 18 U.S.C. § 1001; Perjury – 18 U.S.C. § 1623 and 18 U.S.C. § 1621; Obstruction of Justice — 18 U.S.C. § 1503; Conspiracy — 18 U.S.C. § 371. Judge Thomas W. Thrash also violated multiple Canons of the Code of Judicial Conduct. Canon 1 — Judges Shall Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary. Canon 1 – Judges shall not show favoritism. Canon 2 — Judges Shall Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety. Canon 2A. — Judges shall respect and comply with the law. Canon 2A. – Judges shall promote public confidence in the integrity of the judiciary. Canon 2A. – Judges shall promote public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary. Canon 3 — Judges Shall Perform the Duties of Their Office Impartially and Diligently. Canon 3 B.(2) — Judges should be faithful to the law. Canon 3 B.(5) — Judges shall perform judicial duties without bias or prejudice. Canon 3 B.(7) — Judges shall accord to every person the right to be heard according to law. Canon 3 B.(8) — Judges shall dispose of all judicial matters fairly, promptly, and efficiently. Canon 3 D. (2) — Judges who receive information indicating a substantial likelihood that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Standards of Conduct of the State Bar of Georgia should take appropriate action. Canon 3 E. (1) — Judges shall disqualify themselves in any proceeding in which their impartiality might reasonably be questioned, and this includes that judges may not act as judge in a case where he or she is a defendant.]
51. On July 7, 2011, William M. Windsor filed a number of requests to file.
[It had been 21 days since Judge Thomas W. Thrash entered an order placing filing restrictions on Windsor, and NONE of William M. Windsor’s requests to file had been addressed.]
52. On July 7, 2011, William M. Windsor submitted a request for subpoenas for a hearing scheduled by Judge Thomas W. Thrash.
[The request was never docketed or processed. Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to docket the motion claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #42.) This is, of course, ridiculous. William M. Windsor was denied the right to call witnesses at a hearing where William M. Windsor needed to provide evidence of facts essential to the hearing. There was a void of due process in virtually everything that Judge Thomas W. Thrash did.]
53. On July 7, 2011, William M. Windsor filed a REQUEST FOR CONSENT TO FILE motion TO RECUSE (041-x1). (041-x15 and 041-x16 are true and correct copy of the cover letters sent with this filing.) (041-x17 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
[The motion was never docketed or processed. Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to docket the motion claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #42.) This is, of course, ridiculous. A motion to recuse cannot be frivolous or abuse of the system. This motion was based upon 28 U.S.C. § 455 and pervasive bias. Judge Thomas W. Thrash never ruled on the previous motion for recusal, so this was absolutely appropriate. Multiple motions for recusal are absolutely allowed, and judges have a legal obligation to deal with these motions rather than ignore them.]
54. On July 7, 2011, William M. Windsor filed a REQUEST FOR CONSENT TO FILE a motion to disqualify (041-x2). (041-x15 and 041-x16 are true and correct copy of the cover letters sent with these papers.) (041-x17 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
[The motion was never docketed or processed. Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to docket the motion claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #42.) This is, of course, ridiculous. Judge Thomas W. Thrash never ruled on the previous motion for recusal, so this was absolutely appropriate. Multiple motions for recusal are absolutely allowed, and judges have a legal obligation to deal with these motions rather than ignore them.]
55. On July 7, 2011, William M. Windsor filed a REQUEST FOR CONSENT TO FILE motion for sanctions (041-x3). (041-x15 and 041-x16 are true and correct copy of the cover letters sent with these papers.) (041-x17 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
[The motion was never docketed or processed. Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to docket the motion claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #42.) This is, of course, ridiculous. This is a motion for sanctions against the U.S. Attorneys for false and improper pleadings. Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorizes such motions as does the Court’s Inherent Powers.]
56. On July 7, 2011, William M. Windsor filed a REQUEST FOR CONSENT TO FILE motion for sanctions AGAINST CLERK (041-x4). (041-x15 and 041-x16 are true and correct copy of the cover letters sent with these papers.) (041-x17 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
[The motion was never docketed or processed. Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to docket the motion claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #42.) This is, of course, ridiculous. This is a motion for sanctions against the Clerk of the Court for the destruction of and intentional mishandling of William M. Windsor’s filings. Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorizes such motions as does the Court’s Inherent Powers.]
57. On July 7, 2011, William M. Windsor filed a REQUEST FOR CONSENT TO FILE a motion for protection (041-x5). (041-x15 and 041-x16 are true and correct copy of the cover letters sent with these papers.) (041-x17 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
[The motion was never docketed or processed. Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to docket the motion claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #42.) This is, of course, ridiculous. This was a request for security when at the federal courthouse due to an alleged death threat against William M. Windsor. A death threat cannot possibly be considered frivolous.]
58. On July 7, 2011, William M. Windsor filed a REQUEST FOR CONSENT TO FILE a Motion to reschedule a hearing (041-x6). (041-x15 and 041-x16 are true and correct copy of the cover letters sent with these papers.) (041-x17 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
[The motion was never docketed or processed. Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to docket the motion claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #42.) This is, of course, ridiculous. This was a simple request to reschedule a hearing due to a conflict.]
59. On July 7, 2011, William M. Windsor filed a REQUEST FOR CONSENT TO FILE a motion to allow filings (041-x7). (041-x15 and 041-x16 are true and correct copy of the cover letters sent with these papers.) (041-x17 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
[The motion was never docketed or processed. Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to docket the motion claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #42.) This is, of course, ridiculous. This was a simple request for William M. Windsor’s motions to be docketed.]
60. On July 7, 2011, William M. Windsor filed a REQUEST FOR CONSENT TO FILE A MOTION FOR SUBPOENAS (041-x8). (041-x15 and 041-x16 are true and correct copy of the cover letters sent with these papers.) (041-x17 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
[The motion was never docketed or processed. Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to docket the motion claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #42.) This is, of course, ridiculous. Pro se parties do not have the authority to issue subpoenas as attorneys do. (This is one of the many ways that pro se parties do not receive equal protection.) Without subpoenas, William M. Windsor was unable to subpoena witnesses or documents that he needed.]
61. On July 7, 2011, William M. Windsor filed a REQUEST FOR CONSENT TO FILE A MOTION TO REQUIRE ATTENDANCE OF THE DEFENDANTS AT A SCHEDULED HEARING (041-x9). (041-x15 and 041-x16 are true and correct copy of the cover letters sent with these papers.) (041-x17 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
[The motion was never docketed or processed. Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to docket the motion claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #42.) This is, of course, ridiculous. This was a simple request to require the Defendants to be present at a hearing scheduled by Judge Thomas W. Thrash.]
62. On July 7, 2011, William M. Windsor filed a REQUEST FOR CONSENT TO FILE MOTION FOR HEARING ON MOTION TO RECUSE (041-x10). (041-x15 and 041-x16 are true and correct copy of the cover letters sent with these papers.) (041-x17 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
[The motion was never docketed or processed. Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to docket the motion claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #42.) This is, of course, ridiculous. Under Local Rule 7.1 E. of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, judges decide motions without a hearing unless a hearing is ordered by the judge. Therefore, a motion has to be filed requesting a hearing. Such motions cannot possibly be frivolous or be abuse of the judicial system.]
63. On July 7, 2011, William M. Windsor filed a REQUEST FOR CONSENT TO FILE A MOTION FOR HEARING ON MOTION TO DISQUALIFY (041-x11). (041-x15 and 041-x16 are true and correct copy of the cover letters sent with these papers.) (041-x17 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
[The motion was never docketed or processed. Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to docket the motion claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #42.) This is, of course, ridiculous. Under Local Rule 7.1 E. of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, judges decide motions without a hearing unless a hearing is ordered by the judge. Therefore, a motion has to be filed requesting a hearing. Such motions cannot possibly be frivolous or be abuse of the judicial system.]
64. On July 7, 2011, William M. Windsor filed a REQUEST FOR CONSENT TO FILE MOTION FOR HEARING ON MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
[The motion was never docketed or processed. Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to docket the motion claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #42.) This is, of course, ridiculous. Under Local Rule 7.1 E. of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, judges decide motions without a hearing unless a hearing is ordered by the judge. Therefore, a motion has to be filed requesting a hearing. Such motions cannot possibly be frivolous or be abuse of the judicial system.]
65. On July 7, 2011, William M. Windsor filed a REQUEST FOR CONSENT TO FILE MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST CLERK (041-x13). (041-x15 and 041-x16 are true and correct copy of the cover letters sent with these papers.) (041-x17 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
[The motion was never docketed or processed. Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to docket the motion claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #42.) This is, of course, ridiculous.]
66. On July 7, 2011, William M. Windsor filed a REQUEST FOR CONSENT TO FILE A MOTION FOR HEARING ON MOTION FOR PROTECTION (041-x14). (041-x15 and 041-x16 are true and correct copy of the cover letters sent with these papers.) (041-x17 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
[The motion was never docketed or processed. Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to docket the motion claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #42.) This is, of course, ridiculous. Under Local Rule 7.1 E. of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, judges decide motions without a hearing unless a hearing is ordered by the judge. Therefore, a motion has to be filed requesting a hearing. Such motions cannot possibly be frivolous or be abuse of the judicial system.]
67. On July 7, 2011, Judge Thomas W. Thrash entered an order (01922 Docket #42) in which he denied permission “to file†papers received by the Clerk on 7/7/11.
[Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to file claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†These filings are listed in the paragraphs immediately above, and there is nothing frivolous or improper about any of them. Calling something “frivolous†is a patented corruption technique used by judges so they don’t have to explain a ruling that is totally indefensible. This is not a valid order because it is not signed, and it does not bear the seal of the court; this is a violation of the rules mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1691. Violations of Georgia state laws by Judge Thomas W. Thrash are: Perjury – O.C.G.A. § 16-10-70; False Swearing – Making False Statements – O.C.G.A. § 16-10-71 and O.C.G.A. 16-10-20; Conspiracy – O.C.G.A. § 16-4-8; violation of the RICO statute of the State of Georgia, violations of federal laws by Judge Thomas W. Thrash are: False Swearing – Making False Statements – 18 U.S.C. § 1001; Perjury – 18 U.S.C. § 1623 and 18 U.S.C. § 1621; Obstruction of Justice — 18 U.S.C. § 1503; Conspiracy — 18 U.S.C. § 371. Judge Thomas W. Thrash also violated multiple Canons of the Code of Judicial Conduct. Canon 1 — Judges Shall Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary. Canon 1 – Judges shall not show favoritism. Canon 2 — Judges Shall Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety. Canon 2A. — Judges shall respect and comply with the law. Canon 2A. – Judges shall promote public confidence in the integrity of the judiciary. Canon 2A. – Judges shall promote public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary. Canon 3 — Judges Shall Perform the Duties of Their Office Impartially and Diligently. Canon 3 B.(2) — Judges should be faithful to the law. Canon 3 B.(5) — Judges shall perform judicial duties without bias or prejudice. Canon 3 B.(7) — Judges shall accord to every person the right to be heard according to law. Canon 3 B.(8) — Judges shall dispose of all judicial matters fairly, promptly, and efficiently. Canon 3 D. (2) — Judges who receive information indicating a substantial likelihood that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Standards of Conduct of the State Bar of Georgia should take appropriate action. Canon 3 E. (1) — Judges shall disqualify themselves in any proceeding in which their impartiality might reasonably be questioned, and this includes that judges may not act as judge in a case where he or she is a defendant.]
68. On July 7, 2011, the Docket shows an unnumbered entry: Clerks Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor re Docket # 42 Order, Docket #41 Order. (dr) (Entered: 07/07/2011.)
[Unnumbered entries are illegal according to the statutes and rules. Everything done in a case is supposed to be docketed and numbered.]
69. On July 11, 2011, William M. Windsor submitted a MOTION FOR SANCTIONS for failure of the Defendants to file certificates of interested parties. (032-x1.)
[The motion was never docketed or processed. The required certificates have never been filed. Judge Thomas W. Thrash denied permission to file claiming “The claims are frivolous and the papers are attempted abuse of the judicial system.†(01922 Docket #43.) Judge Thomas W. Thrash entered an absurd order as the filing of the certificate is required by the rules. This is a mandatory filing after a federal civil action begins as per Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 7.1. None of the Defendants ever filed this mandatory certificate. Judge Thomas W. Thrash allowed the Defendants to violate this Rule. Violations of Georgia state laws by Judge Thomas W. Thrash are: Conspiracy – O.C.G.A. § 16-4-8; violation of the RICO statute of the State of Georgia, violations of federal laws by Judge Thomas W. Thrash are: Obstruction of Justice — 18 U.S.C. § 1503; Conspiracy — 18 U.S.C. § 371. Judge Thomas W. Thrash also violated multiple Canons of the Code of Judicial Conduct. Canon 1 — Judges Shall Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary. Canon 1 – Judges shall not show favoritism. Canon 2 — Judges Shall Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety. Canon 2A. — Judges shall respect and comply with the law. Canon 2A. – Judges shall promote public confidence in the integrity of the judiciary. Canon 2A. – Judges shall promote public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary. Canon 3 — Judges Shall Perform the Duties of Their Office Impartially and Diligently. Canon 3 B.(2) — Judges should be faithful to the law. Canon 3 B.(5) — Judges shall perform judicial duties without bias or prejudice. Canon 3 B.(7) — Judges shall accord to every person the right to be heard according to law. Canon 3 B.(8) — Judges shall dispose of all judicial matters fairly, promptly, and efficiently. Canon 3 D. (2) — Judges who receive information indicating a substantial likelihood that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Standards of Conduct of the State Bar of Georgia should take appropriate action. Canon 3 E. (1) — Judges shall disqualify themselves in any proceeding in which their impartiality might reasonably be questioned, and this includes that judges may not act as judge in a case where he or she is a defendant.]
70. On July 11, 2011, the Docket shows an unnumbered entry: Submission of Docket #27 MOTION for Reconsideration re Docket #19 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, Docket #26 MOTION for Reconsideration MOTION for Hearing, Docket #7 MOTION Deny Removal MOTION for Hearing, Docket #24 MOTION for Leave to File to Commence Discovery and Obtain Subpoenas to Compel Attendance at Preliminary Injunction Hearing, Docket #12 MOTION to Disqualify Attorney, submitted to District Judge Thomas W. Thrash. (dr) (Entered: 07/11/2011.)
[Unnumbered entries are illegal according to the statutes and rules. Everything done in a case is supposed to be docketed and numbered.]
71. On July 13, 2011, Judge Thomas W. Thrash entered an order (01922 Docket #48) in which he denied five William M. Windsor motions. No explanation was given; Judge Thomas W. Thrash simply said the claims were frivolous.
[The five motions denied as “frivolous†were a motion to disqualify, a motion to commence discovery, a motion for reconsideration of order denying TRO, a motion to set a preliminary injunction hearing, and a motion for reconsideration for an extension of time. No one in their right mind could claim these motions were frivolous (which means no basis in fact or law).]
72. On July 13, 2011, the Docket shows an unnumbered entry: Clerks Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor re Docket #43 Order (dr) (Entered: 07/13/2011.)
[Unnumbered entries are illegal according to the statutes and rules. Everything done in a case is supposed to be docketed and numbered.]
73. On July 14, 2011, William M. Windsor filed a Notice of Appeal of the preliminary injunction (protective order) and other orders. [01922 Docket #46.] (046-x1 is a true and correct copy of the cover letter sent with these papers.) (046-x2 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
74. On July 14, 2011, the Docket shows an unnumbered entry: Clerks Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor re 01922 Docket #48 Order. (dr) (Entered: 07/14/2011.)
[Unnumbered entries are illegal according to the statutes and rules. Everything done in a case is supposed to be docketed and numbered.]
75. On July 15, 2011, William M. Windsor filed a MOTION TO CONFIRM STAY. [01922 Docket #51.] (051-x2 is the Delivery Confirmation for these papers that shows the signed receipt was obtained by the courier.)
76. On July 18, 2011, the Docket shows an unnumbered entry: Clerks Certificate of Mailing as to William M. Windsor re 01922 Docket #49 Order. (dr) (Entered: 07/18/2011.)
[Unnumbered entries are illegal according to the statutes and rules. Everything done in a case is supposed to be docketed and numbered.]
This is Part 3. I will add Part 4 as soon as time permits. You will find that the final tally will be hundreds of violations. I never violated any rule or law.
Note: I am not an attorney. I am pro se. I do not give legal advice. My comments and charges here are my views based upon thousands of hours of study of law as a pro se party.
Part 1 — Part 2 — Part 3 — Part 4 — Part 5
William M. Windsor
I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney. This website expresses my OPINIONS. The comments of visitors to the website are their opinions and do not therefore reflect my opinions. This website does not provide legal advice. I do not give legal advice. I do not practice law. This website is to expose corruption in government, law enforcement, and the judiciary. Whatever this website says about the law is presented in the context of how I or others perceive the applicability of the law to a set of circumstances if I (or some other author) was in the circumstances under the conditions discussed. Despite of my concerns about lawyers in general, I suggest that anyone with legal questions consult an attorney for an answer, particularly after reading anything on this website. The law is a gray area at best. Please read our Legal Notice and Terms.
{jcomments on}