 |
From the Article II SuperPac website:
“After the Office of the President of the United States was usurped by a dual-citizen candidate in 2008, the nation was awakened to the realization that the U.S. Constitution, in particular Article II and presidential eligibility, no longer matters to our elected representatives and the main stream media.
“Efforts for redress against this attack on the U.S. Constitution ranging from lawsuits to merely seeking the truth as to how it could happen were met with lies, obfuscation and even ridicule. With a complicit media ignoring all calls for honest reporting on the issue, Americans harnessed the internet and the new technologies of the 21st century to join in a communications revolution bypassing the media and bringing to life the ideals of our Founding Fathers.
“Arising out of this synergy and answering the call to defend the U.S. Constitution, fellow Americans across the country have joined forces and proudly announce Article II Super PAC.
“Article II Super PAC’s overall goal is to ensure that citizens and elected officials clearly understand Article II and the definitive meaning intended by the United States of America’s Founding Fathers of “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN,†thereby working to create a legally-binding vetting apparatus which will ensure all presidential and vice-presidential candidates are constitutionally eligible in 2012 and future elections.”
See http://www.art2superpac.com/georgiaballot.html
I haven’t been involved with this issue, though it seems clearly to me to be a dishonesty and corruption issue. Based upon my reading of what a “natural born citizen” is, Barack Obama does not qualify. Based upon my cursory review of articles examining the validity of Barack Obama’s alleged birth certificate, it appears to have been forged. So, unless or until someone can provide me with proof to the contrary, I absolutely support this effort.
William M. Windsor
I, William M. Windsor, am not an attorney. This website expresses my OPINIONS. The comments of visitors or guest authors to the website are their opinions and do not therefore reflect my opinions. This website does not provide legal advice. I do not give legal advice. I do not practice law. This website is to expose government corruption, law enforcement corruption, political corruption, and judicial corruption. Whatever this website says about the law is presented in the context of how I or others perceive the applicability of the law to a set of circumstances if I (or some other author) was in the circumstances under the conditions discussed. Despite of my concerns about lawyers in general, I suggest that anyone with legal questions consult an attorney for an answer, particularly after reading anything on this website. The law is a gray area at best. Please read our Legal Notice and Terms.
{jcomments on}