News Reports
Bill Windsor is taking a stand for Freedom of Speech - End of Day 36 of Tweet-Gate
- 02 Feb
- Last Updated: Friday, 30 June 2017 17:46
- Published: Monday, 02 February 2015 16:30
- Written by Bubba
![]() |
Bill Windsor is taking a stand for Freedom of Speech at 7:30 pm Eastern Time on February 2, 2015 -- Day 36 as a "wanted" man.
Freedom of speech is as fundamental a right as there is. What these crooks are trying to do to Bill Windsor is beyong outrageous -- put him in prison for life for sending a Tweet, sending an email to an attorney, and publishing the name of Sean B**shie who attempted to murder him and mercilessly cyberstalked him.
Bill Windsor thought the jig was up...
Read more: Bill Windsor is taking a stand for Freedom of Speech - End of Day 36 of Tweet-Gate
Bill Windsor is battling Denial of Constitutional Rights - Day 35 of Tweet-Gate
- 01 Feb
- Last Updated: Friday, 30 June 2017 17:46
- Published: Sunday, 01 February 2015 08:25
- Written by Crystal Cox
![]() |
Bill Windsor is still alive and exposing corruption at 9:25 am Eastern Time on February 1, 2015 -- Day 35 as a "wanted" man.
Corrupt people in Montana and Texas are attempting to put Bill Windsor in prison for life for their crimes of denial of the most fundamental of Constitutional rights. If you have not yet read the report of the five crimes that Bill Windsor is charged with, please read it. And no, this isn't a joke.
Happy Super Bowl Sunday and Happy February from sunny Florida...
Read more: Bill Windsor is battling Denial of Constitutional Rights - Day 35 of Tweet-Gate
Supreme Court Landmark Decision means Constitution is Void
- 21 Jan
- Published: Thursday, 20 January 2011 22:00
- Written by William M. Windsor
![]() |
The United States Supreme Court issued a landmark decision on the validity of the Constitution of the United States on January 18, 2011.
I have been ill since mid-December, and I had my fourth eye surgery on Monday. I am sorry that I have not updated the site for a month or so. As soon as I can see again, I will write a daily blog.
This news has gotten a lot of coverage online. It is amazing to me the people who don't have a clue what they are talking about who say this is bogus and a hoax.
Heaven help us!
The most important facts for everyone to know at this point are that our federal court system is corrupt from the bottom to the top. I will exclude Sonia Sotomayor from the list for the moment, because I have reason to suspect that she would have done the right thing, but six justices is all it takes, and she was outvoted.
I will be on many radio shows in the next few weeks. I'll post the stations that I will be on when they give me all the information.
Read more: Supreme Court Landmark Decision means Constitution is Void
Plan presented to reform Alabama Constitution
- 21 Apr
- Last Updated: Friday, 30 June 2017 17:46
- Published: Wednesday, 20 April 2011 20:07
- Written by Admin
![]() |
Alabama State Senator Del Marsh's (R-Anniston) has offered a resolution that could lead to reforming Alabama's antiquated state Constitution.
He will propose a 16-member commission that will recommend changes to the Constitution on an article-by-article schedule that first looks at private corporations and banking, to be followed in 2012 by legislative powers and presentation.
Supreme Court Justice Thomas signals his vote on Landmark Decision on the Constitution
- Published: Thursday, 18 November 2010 22:00
- Written by William M. Windsor
![]() |
The United States Supreme Court will soon issue a landmark decision on the validity of the Constitution of the United States, and on November 19, Justice Thomas signaled how he will likely vote.
On a simple Application for a Stay (hold on proceedings in the lower courts) until The Supreme Court rules on the Petitions, Justice Thomas denied the Application.
Perhaps Justice Thomas had some valid reason for such an order, but his order consisted of one word: "denied."
Justice Thomas violated The Supreme Court's own "law" in Corcoran v. Levenhagen by issuing an order with no explanation.
I read this to indicate how Justice Thomas will vote. I believe he is likely to vote to allow the federal judges to continue to commit crimes and violate our Constitutional rights. I look forward to apologizing to him if he votes against the corruption!
The Supreme Court will consider these questions in three petitions filed by me::
- Will The Supreme Court declare that the Constitution and its amendments may be voided by the federal judges in Atlanta, Georgia?
- Should federal judges be stopped from committing illegal and corrupt acts to obstruct justice and inflict bias on litigants?
- Will The Supreme Court be afraid to disclose the corruption in the federal courts?
I have discovered that, at least in Atlanta, Georgia, the federal courts operate like a police state in which the judges are all-powerful, committing criminal acts from their benches high above the courtooms and violating the Constitutional rights of tens of thousands of parties who have the misfortune of appearing in their courts. After finding nothing but corruption at the federal district courts and the court of appeals, I have put the justices of The United States Supreme Court on the hot seat. By filing Petitions for Writs of Mandamus rather than an appeal, The Supreme Court is forced to deal with the issue. And the fundamental issue is whether the corruption extends all the way to the top. Is The United States Supreme Court corrupt, too?
If The Supreme Court fails to act against these federal judges, the citizens of the United States need to know that there is not a shred of deceny, honesty, or Constitutional rights in our federal courts. Corruption has consumed the federal court system, and we now live in a police state. Judges are free to do absolutely anything they want. Our laws are meaningless. Your life savings can be stolen by a federal judge, and they have no risk in violating every law in the books.
The Supreme Court may render its decision before the end of the year. The accused judges have been given until December 15, 2010 to file their response. That will be an interesting day. My guess is that none of the judges will respond. I believe that because I doubt that a federal judge wants to commit perjury in a filing with The Supreme Court.
News Coverage:
The story is now on 58,000 web pages. Just do a search for "Supreme Court to issue Landmark Decision on the Constitution."
http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/united-states-supreme-court-will-soon/1396052/
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=xprnw.20101113.CL01025&show_article=1
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS27117+13-Nov-2010+PRN20101113